Renal impairment after ileostomy formation: a frequent event with long-term consequences.

AIM: High stoma output and dehydration is common following ileostomy formation. However, the impact of this on renal function, both in the short term and after ileostomy reversal, remains poorly defined. We aimed to assess the independent impact on kidney function of an ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery and subsequent reversibility after ileostomy closure. METHODS: This retrospective single-site cohort study identified patients undergoing rectal cancer resection from 2003 to 2017, with or without a diverting ileostomy. Renal function was calculated preoperatively, before ileostomy closure, and 6 months after ileostomy reversal (or matched times for patients without ileostomy). Demographics, oncological treatments and nephrotoxic drug prescriptions were assessed. Outcome measures were deterioration from baseline renal function and development of moderate/severe chronic kidney disease (CKD ≥ 3). Multivariate analysis was performed to assess independent risk factors for postoperative renal impairment. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-three of 1213 patients had an ileostomy. Postoperative renal impairment occurred more frequently in ileostomates (9.5% absolute increase in rate of CKD ≥ 3; P < 0.0001) vs no change in patients without an ileostomy (P = 0.757). Multivariate analysis identified ileostomy formation, age, anastomotic leak and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors as independently associated with postoperative renal decline. Despite stoma closure, ileostomates remained at increased risk of progression to new or worse CKD [74/438 (16.9%)] compared to patients without an ileostomy [36/437 (8.2%), P = 0.0001, OR 2.264 (1.49-3.46)]. CONCLUSIONS: Ileostomy formation is independently associated with kidney injury, with an increased risk persisting after stoma closure. Strategies to protect against kidney injury may be important in higher risk patients (elderly, receiving renin-angiotensin system antihypertensives, or following anastomotic leakage).

Role of circulating tumour cells in predicting recurrence after excision of primary colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the potential for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based circulating tumour cell identification to predict colorectal cancer recurrence. METHODS: mRNA for carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 20 was identified by RT-PCR in blood from patients with colorectal cancer, before and after primary tumour resection. Cancer recurrence was assessed at follow-up, and the accuracy of RT-PCR and primary tumour lymph node positivity in predicting recurrence was estimated. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six patients with colorectal cancer were studied over a median follow-up of 1393 days from surgery. Regression analysis selected 24-h post-resection RT-PCR positivity (hazard ratio for a positive test in predicting recurrence 8.66 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 3.08 to 24.33)) before lymph node involvement (hazard ratio 7.92 (95 per cent c.i. 3.26 to 19.20)). When 24-h post-resection RT-PCR was combined with lymph node positivity, the hazard ratio increased to 18.54 (95 per cent c.i. 4.01 to 85.11), attributing a 3 per cent recurrence risk to 52 per cent, and a 50 per cent recurrence risk to 48 per cent, of patients with colorectal cancer resected with curative intent. CONCLUSION: RT-PCR positivity within 24 h of primary colorectal cancer resection is a strong predictor of colorectal cancer recurrence, and may be useful clinically.

P53 mutation and response to hepatic arterial floxuridine in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To establish the relationship between the number and site of p53 genomic mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer, and the response to hepatic arterial floxuridine. METHODS: Liver metastasis biopsies were collected, at the time of laparotomy for hepatic arterial cannulation. in 28 patients with metachronous colorectal liver metastases. p53 Gene mutations were assessed using reverse transcription, nested polymerase chain reaction, single strand conformational polymorphism and gene sequencing. Chemotherapy response was determined from computerised liver tomograms after 4 months of treatment. RESULTS: Liver metastasis p53 mutation was identified in 21 (75%), and p53 "hot spot" mutation in 11 (39%) patients. There was a significantly lower prevalence (Fisher's, P=0.001) of patients with p53 "hot spot"-mutated liver metastases in stable disease and partial response (5/22) than in progressive (6/6) disease groups. Significantly fewer (Mann-Whitney U, P=0.002) p53 "hot spot" mutations/biopsy were observed in liver metastases from stable disease and partial response (median 0, iqr. 0-0) than in progressive (median 1, iqr 1-2) disease patients. p53 "Hot spot"-mutated liver metastases were associated with significantly shorter survival times (logrank P=0.05) after hepatic arterial floxuridine. Significant response or survival-time differences by total or L2/L3 zinc-binding site p53 mutations were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a role for p53 "hot spot" mutations in colorectal liver metastasis resistance to fluorinated pyrimidines, and suggest that the presence of such mutations may be a contra-indication to treatment of colorectal liver metastases with hepatic arterial floxuridine.

Relationship between tumour vascularity and circulating cancer cells in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer vascularity correlates with risk of metastasis. Greater tumour vascularity may increase haematogenous dissemination by providing a larger vessel area for tumour cell invasion into the circulation. We assessed whether the prevalence of tumour cells in the circulation of colorectal carcinoma patients (CTC) increased with tumour vascularity. METHODS: Pre-operative blood samples were assessed for circulating tumour cells using RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) mRNA. Vessel count and volume were morphometrically assessed from tumour biopsies after vasculature staining. RESULTS: Thirty-three colorectal cancer patients (M:F, 20:13; mean age 66 years, SD 11 years) were studied. One or more blood samples were RT-PCR positive for either CEA or CK20 mRNA or both, in 28 (85%) patients. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of RT-PCR positive patients between high and low tumour vascularity groups, or in tumour vessel counts or volume in RT-PCR positive compared with negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support vascularity related variation in access of tumour cells to the circulation as an explanation for the correlation between tumour vasculature and metastasis. Tumour vascularity and metastatic potential may be linked phenotypes rather than cause and effect.

P53 mutations in primary and metastatic tumors and circulating tumor cells from colorectal carcinoma patients.

Circulating tumor cells could provide a relatively noninvasive and repeatable source of information about tumor cell genotype that might influence treatment and estimation of prognosis. We developed a technique for identifying p53 mutations in tumor cells isolated from the peripheral venous blood of colorectal cancer patients and compared the prevalence and position of these mutations with multiple solid tumor samples from the same patient. We used immunomagnetic beads to isolate tumor cells, reverse transcriptase-nested polymerase chain amplification of the coding region between exons 4 and 9 within the p53 gene, and automated gene sequencing. Nineteen p53 mutations were detected in solid tumor samples from 19 of 41 colorectal carcinoma patients. An identical p53 mutation was invariably present in all samples from primary and metastatic colorectal tumor biopsies within the same patient. p53 mutations were detected in peripheral blood from 8 of these 19 patients with p53-mutated solid tumors. Where identified, the pattern of mutation in peripheral blood samples was invariably the same as in matching solid tumor samples. A single colorectal carcinoma biopsy provided reliable p53 gene mutational information in colorectal carcinoma. Detection of this p53 mutation in tumor cells from peripheral blood was achieved with an approach based on cell selection for epithelial characteristics, reverse transcription-PCR, and gene sequencing.

Venesection needle coring increases positive results with RT-PCR for detection of circulating cells expressing CEA mRNA.

We assessed whether circulating cell positivity using RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) cDNA was affected by venesection via a needle compared with a pre-aspirated venous cannula, and by increased PCR cycles. Systemic blood was sampled by needle and pre-aspirated cannula in 101 healthy individuals with no cancer history. After erythrocyte removal, samples were subjected to RT-PCR using specific primers for CEA, with 29 or 35 RT-PCR cycles. There was a significant difference between the number of subjects whose samples were negative when collected via needle venesection and positive when collected via pre-aspirated cannula, compared with positive by needle venesection and negative by pre-aspirated cannula for both 29 (P = 0.016) and 35 (P = 0.0111) RT-PCR cycles. Venesection technique (P = 0.01) and number of cycles (P = 0.003) were significant predictors of a positive result. Positive results in healthy subjects were reduced to less than 3% when an aspirated cannula was used for venesection and >29 PCR cycles were avoided.

Increased detection of circulating tumor cells in the blood of colorectal carcinoma patients using two reverse transcription-PCR assays and multiple blood samples.

The objectives of this study were to assess whether the use of two reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) cDNA assays and multiple blood sampling increased circulating tumor cell detection in colorectal cancer patients. Systemic blood was sampled three times at 1-min intervals in 100 colorectal cancer patients (50 primary tumors only and 50 liver metastases), and in 70 control patients without known cancer. After removal of the erythrocytes, samples were subjected to separate RT-PCR reactions using specific primers for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20). Statistical analysis was performed by the two-sample binomial test and the one-sided McNemar test. There were significant increases in circulating tumor cell positivity when CEA and CK20 assays were used together as compared with either CEA or CK20 assay used alone. There were also significant increases in circulating tumor cell positivity for either CEA or CK20 assay used alone when the results from two blood samples were compared with the results from one sample. Circulating colorectal cancer cell positivity rose from 48% (CEA) and 34% (CK20) with one assay of one sample to 74% when both assays of three samples were used to identify circulating tumor cells. Three non-cancer control patients (4.3%) were positive for either CEA (two patients) or CK20 (one patient). Tumor cells were identified more frequently in the circulation of colorectal cancer patients than had been suggested previously. RT-PCR-based studies of the clinical significance of circulating cancer cells in colorectal cancer should involve multiple blood samples with identification of multiple tumor-related cDNA products.