Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 4(3): 177-86, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12047396

ABSTRACT

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluated the addition of nateglinide, a d-phenylalanine derivative that restores early phase insulin release, to metformin in type 2 diabetes patients stabilized on high-dose metformin. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial included 467 metformin-treated patients with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between 6.8% and 11%. Patients were randomized to add nateglinide 60 mg, 120 mg or placebo before three meals to metformin 1000 mg b.i.d. for 24 weeks. RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly reduced with nateglinide 60 mg and 120 mg plus metformin compared with metformin control (-0.36%, p = 0.003; -0.59%, p < 0.001 respectively). Greater benefits occurred if patients had elevated HbA1c at baseline (-1.38% with nateglinide 120 mg in patients with HbA1c > 9.5%). A modest fasting plasma glucose reduction was observed. Most symptoms suggestive of hypoglycaemia occurred in patients with low HbA1c levels (

Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Cyclohexanes/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Phenylalanine/analogs & derivatives , Phenylalanine/therapeutic use , Aged , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Cholesterol/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nateglinide , Placebos , Racial Groups , Safety , Triglycerides/blood
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 39(2): 156-64, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10725065

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the new oral microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin A (CyA; Sandimmun Neoral) and the original CyA formulation (Sandimmun), in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), over a 12-month period. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicentre study, patients were randomized to treatment with Neoral or Sandimmun, starting with 2.5 mg/kg/day, with dose adjustments after 4 weeks. Primary efficacy criteria included patients' assessment of disease activity. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Compared with Sandimmun, Neoral showed a consistent trend towards greater clinical efficacy from week 12 onwards, including a significant difference in patients' assessment of disease activity at the study end-points. A significantly lower increase in dose from baseline was observed with Neoral at week 24. Pharmacokinetic assessments at week 24 showed increased absorption and decreased variability with Neoral. No differences in safety were found between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These observations indicate that Neoral is as safe and at least as effective as Sandimmun and have important implications for patient management given the increasing role for CyA in the treatment of severe, active RA.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Creatinine/blood , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Emulsions , Humans , Joints/drug effects , Joints/pathology , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Safety , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Rheumatol ; 26(3): 556-62, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10090162

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be converted, on a milligram-to-milligram basis, from conventional cyclosporin A (CyA, Sandimmun) to the microemulsion formulation (Neoral) with maintenance of longterm safety, and to compare cyclosporin A (CyA) pharmacokinetics between formulations. METHODS: In this double blind, multicenter, parallel group study, 51 patients receiving stable conventional CyA maintenance treatment were randomized to continue conventional CyA (n = 27) or to convert to CyA microemulsion (n = 24) and were monitored for 52 weeks. Trough blood CyA levels were measured before and at intervals after conversion. CyA steady-state area under the curve was assessed one week before and 2 and 6 weeks after randomization in 15 patients in each treatment arm. CyA trough levels and pharmacokinetic results remained unknown to investigators throughout the study. CyA doses were titrated as necessary on the basis of clinical evaluation and disease activity assessments. RESULTS: Initial mean daily doses were 3.5 mg/kg/day (conventional CyA) and 3.3 mg/kg/day (CyA microemulsion) and did not change significantly during the study. The mean bioavailability of CyA from the microemulsion formulation was 23% higher than from conventional CyA. Replicate assessments indicated a more reproducible pharmacokinetic profile with CyA microemulsion. The overall incidence and nature of adverse events and changes in vital signs and laboratory variables were similar in both groups. No clinically relevant differences in efficacy were found between treatments. No loss of efficacy and no tolerability problems occurred after conversion from conventional to microemulsion CyA. CONCLUSION: Existing CyA dosing guidelines, formulated for conventional CyA, are suitable for longterm CyA microemulsion therapy of patients with RA. These results indicate the pharmacokinetic advantages of the microemulsion formulation.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/pharmacokinetics , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/metabolism , Biological Availability , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Creatinine/blood , Double-Blind Method , Drug Compounding , Emulsions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Safety , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Rheumatol ; 25(7): 1263-9, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9676754

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and tolerability of converting patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking a stable dose of cyclosporin A (CyA) maintenance treatment (Sandimmun, SIM) to a new microemulsion capsule formulation, Sandimmun Neoral (Neoral), at an initial dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day. METHODS: In this single arm, open multicenter study, 28 patients were recruited to enter a 6 week pre-conversion period; of these, 22 patients completed 12 weeks' treatment with Neoral. RESULTS: During the 12 week post-conversion period, 11 patients experienced adverse events considered to be drug related; most were mild to moderate in severity and reflected the known safety profile for CyA. Only slight differences in efficacy variables were observed after conversion. The mean Neoral dose at Week 12 (2.84 mg/kg/day) was lower than the mean SIM pre-conversion dose (3.38 mg/kg/day). The study showed that, in patients with RA undergoing stable SIM maintenance treatment, conversion to an initial Neoral dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day did not give rise to any clinically relevant safety and tolerability concerns, and efficacy of the treatment was maintained compared with SIM. CONCLUSION: This conversion strategy constitutes a clinically acceptable alternative to a 1:1 dose conversion.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL