Human immunodeficiency virus infection and genital warts as risk factors for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in homosexual men.

The incidence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) was studied in a group of 210 homosexual and bisexual men. The presence of genital warts and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was assessed as risk factors for the development of AIN. In all, 74 (35 per cent) of the group had histological evidence of AIN. The relative risk of being positive for HIV on AIN (relative to being negative for HIV) was 1.58 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.01-2.48). The relative risk of anal warts on AIN (relative to absence of anal warts) was 4.70 (95 per cent c.i. 1.81-12.20). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant interactive effect between HIV and anal warts on the risk of AIN. It is concluded from the results of a Mantel-Haenzel analysis that the presence of anal warts and HIV infection are independent risk factors for the development of AIN in homosexual and bisexual men.

A comparison between cytology and histology to detect anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), which may be a precursor of anal carcinoma, has been identified on histology following minor anal surgical procedures, in particular the removal of perianal condylomata, in increasing numbers of homosexual and bisexual men. Anal cytology has recently been proposed as a useful method of identifying AIN lesions. OBJECTIVE: To compare anal cytology with histology as a method of detecting AIN. METHODS: 215 homosexual and bisexual men attending a central London sexually transmitted diseases clinic had an anal cytological smear performed under standard conditions. The perianal area and anal canal were then examined using a colposcope, and areas macroscopically suggestive of intraepithelial neoplasia were biopsied. RESULTS: 176 of the 215 patients were biopsied of whom 76 had AIN on histology. 154 of the 215 patients had an adequate anal smear of whom 46 and 85 had cytological features of both HPV and AIN, or HPV alone respectively. Including features of HPV alone as an abnormal smear, anal cytology, when compared with anoscopy and histology as the gold standard for diagnosing AIN, resulted in a sensitivity of 87.5%, a specificity of 16.3%, a positive predictive value of 37.4% and a negative predictive value of 69.6%. Restricting abnormal smears to those with features of both HPV and AIN resulted in a sensitivity of 33.9%, a specificity of 72.5%, a positive predictive value of 41.3% and a negative predictive value of 65.7%. CONCLUSION: Anal cytology is a sensitive but nonspecific method of identifying patients with biopsy proven AIN if cytological features of HPV alone are included as abnormal smears. Specificity is improved by restricting abnormal smears to those with features of both HPV and AIN but this markedly lowers the sensitivity of the test. At present, anoscopy and histology are required in addition to anal cytology to differentiate between patients who simply have anal condylomata and those who also have AIN.

Anal human papillomavirus infection: a comparative study of cytology, colposcopy and DNA hybridisation as methods of detection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare anal cytology, colposcopy and DNA hybridisation as methods of detecting anal HPV infection. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Patients attending: (1) a genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic with ano-genital warts; (2) a surgical out-patient department with anal fissure or haemorrhoids were examined for evidence of anal HPV infection. RESULTS: Considering GUM clinic attenders, 17% (38/225) and 40% (90/225) had perianal or anal canal warts respectively. Colposcopic examination revealed anal acetowhite lesions without warts in 28% (63/225). Cytological evidence of HPV infection was found in 98%, 83%, and 90% of patients with anal canal warts, perianal warts and acetowhite lesions respectively. Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) was documented in 22% of patients with anal canal warts compared with 6% with perianal warts (p less than 0.01). HPV DNA was detected from the anal brushings of 71%, 50%, 32%, and 29% of patients with anal canal warts, perianal warts, acetowhite lesions and a normal anal examination respectively. HPV type 6/11 was detected in the majority of HPV positive samples. Considering surgical out-patient attenders with no history or signs of anal warts, 25% showed cytological evidence of anal HPV infection and HPV DNA was detected from anal brushings in 3% (2/71). CONCLUSION: Anal examination with the colposcope is a useful method for detecting subclinical HPV infection. Anal cytology may prove helpful for detecting AIN, however, since koilocytosis was rarely seen, the specificity of the cytological criteria for anal HPV infection in the absence of AIN is uncertain. DNA analysis of anal brushings proved only moderately sensitive.

Is there a preference for different ways of performing faecal occult blood tests?

Low compliance with faecal occult blood screening reduces the power of clinical trials, potential benefit, and efficiency. It has been proposed that the faecal manipulation required to perform conventional guaiac based tests may be an important factor in low compliance. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether use of a new method (vehicle) of stool collection for the faecal occult blood guaiac test would be preferred to the established standard. A novel self-interpreted test, Early Detector (ED), requires the subject to apply a guaiac/peroxide spray to a stool sample collected simply by wiping the anus with a specimen pad. To determine whether this method would be preferred to the stool manipulation required by Haemoccult (HO) and to compare test validity, employees at a London company were invited to use both tests. Eight-hundred and fifty-seven subjects were shown both tests. Before use, 48% indicated a preference for the method of Early Detector; 24% chose Haemoccult (p less than 0.001), while 28% indicated no immediate preference. Seven-hundred and one performed both tests. After use, 74% preferred ED; 5% preferred HO (p less than 0.001); 21% had no preference (NP). The preference for the ED test method was consistent by sex categories, age groups and occupational class. Logistics, aesthetics, and immediacy of results were the main reasons indicated for choosing ED. Whether the preference for ED could result in higher compliance remains to be proven. Its high positivity (14%), however, would preclude its use as a sole test to determine the need for endoscopic and/or radiologic investigation in the screened patient.

Anal and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: possible parallel.

This study evaluated prospectively the use of an endoscope in examination of the anal canal for the detection of premalignant lesions. All patients underwent endoscopy and anal epithelial biopsy; the biopsy samples were examined histologically and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA hybridisation was done. No evidence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) was found in 20 control patients with anal fissure or fistula. Of 82 patients with anal HPV infection, 23 had evidence of AIN. The prevalence of AIN was significantly higher among homosexual than among heterosexual men (17 of 28 vs 1 of 26) with anal HPV infection. Of 28 women with anal HPV infection, 10 had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); 5 of the 10 also had AIN, whereas no woman had AIN in the absence of CIN. The study shows that AIN occurs and can be diagnosed endoscopically in a manner similar to CIN. Further detailed prospective studies on the natural history of AIN and of groups at risk are required.