Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trop Med Int Health ; 27(4): 426-437, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To support governments' efforts at neonatal mortality reduction, UNICEF and the American Academy of Pediatrics launched a telementoring project in Kenya, Pakistan and Tanzania. METHODS: In Fall 2019, an individualised 12-session telementoring curriculum was created for East Africa and Pakistan after site visits that included care assessment, patient data review and discussion with faculty and staff. After the programme, participants, administrators and UNICEF staff were surveyed and participated in focus group discussions. RESULTS: Participants felt the programme improved knowledge and newborn care. Qualitative analysis found three common themes of successful telementoring: local buy-in, use of existing training or clinical improvement structures, and consideration of technology needs. CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring has potential as a powerful tool in newborn education. It offers more flexibility and easier access than in-person sessions. This project has the potential for scale-up, particularly when physical distancing and travel restrictions are the norm.


Subject(s)
Infant Mortality , Child , Focus Groups , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Kenya , Pakistan , Tanzania
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 15(7): 883-9, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18247110

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Community-based prenatal case management (PCM) is a means to improve birth outcomes for medically or socially high-risk pregnant women. To conduct national surveys of PCM programs, a useful sampling frame of existing programs is needed. However, as a relatively small optional Medicaid reimbursed program, PCM programs are hard to reach. Methodological approaches are needed to address issues arising when attempting to access and survey hard-to-reach participants, including programs. METHODS: State Medicaid offices were contacted to determine whether they reimbursed for PCM, and lists of Medicaid providers were obtained from those states. Most providers on the lists were contacted to confirm that they provide PCM and to verify the program director contact information. FINDINGS: Multiple attempts, using different modes of communication, were required to identify states reimbursing for PCM through Medicaid (n = 33). Of providers on the lists obtained from 29 of the 33 states, 34% of those listed provided PCM, suggesting over coverage rather than omissions. Provider contact information was outdated, duplicative, or not specific to PCM. The final count was 1,184 PCM programs in 29 states. CONCLUSION: Identifying hard-to-reach programs requires persistence and creativity, as well as a rigorous approach to generating a census of programs.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services , Medicaid , Prenatal Care , Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys/methods , Humans , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Sampling Studies , State Government , United States
3.
Qual Health Res ; 18(11): 1586-98, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18849519

ABSTRACT

Although significant progress has been made to increase prenatal care access, national organizations concerned with health equity emphasize that eliminating disparities will require greater attention to quality of care, assessed from both the biomedical and patient perspectives. In this study, we examined narratives about pregnancy experiences from low-income primiparous African American, Mexican American, Puerto Rican, and White women who participated in focus groups conducted in 1996. We reanalyzed transcripts from these discussions, extracting passages in which women talked about the content and quality of their prenatal care experiences. Data were mapped to four domains reflecting patient-centeredness markers identified in the 2005 U.S. National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR). These markers include the extent to which the women perceived that their provider listened carefully, explained things, showed respect, and spent enough time with them. The narratives provided by the study participants suggest a critical and intuitive understanding of the NHDR patient-centeredness markers and some shared understanding across cultural groups. Implications for improving quality and its measurement in prenatal care are discussed.


Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Narration , Physician-Patient Relations , Prenatal Care , Quality of Health Care , Women's Health , Communication , Culture , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Midwifery , Minority Groups , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...