ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Cisplatin remains the pivotal chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), with nephrotoxicity considered the dose-limiting toxicity. The purpose of our study was to propose an outpatient high-dose cisplatin protocol aimed at preventing nephrotoxicity and to analyze the results of its utilization in patients with SCCHN treated with concurrent radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 82 SCCHN patients treated with outpatient high-dose cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy at our institution. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease were defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Associated factors were identified using analysis of covariance models for categorical variables and adjusted Pearson correlations for continuous variables. RESULTS: The incidence of AKI during treatment was 34.2%. With a median follow-up of 25.7 months, the average decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12.57 mL/min/1.73 m (SD=18.58). At 1 year and at last follow-up, 5.4% and 4.4% of patients had estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m. Predictors associated with AKI and chronic kidney disease were: lower baseline weight and creatinine, higher baseline creatinine clearance, smoking, female sex, African American race, hypertension, and increased hydration and magnesium replacement requirements. CONCLUSIONS: We encountered limited early and late nephrotoxicity. Importantly, nephrotoxicity was not the main dose-limiting toxicity. Our results emphasize the importance of close monitoring and additional replacement of water and electrolytes as needed. A consistent method of measuring and reporting chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity would be a valuable contribution to the literature.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors underlying heart failure hospitalization. METHODS: Between January 1, 2012, and May 31, 2012, we combined medical record reviews and cross-sectional qualitative interviews of multiple patients with heart failure, their clinicians, and their caregivers from a large academic medical center in the Midwestern United States. The interview data were analyzed using a 3-step grounded theory-informed process and constant comparative methods. Qualitative data were compared and contrasted with results from the medical record review. RESULTS: Patient nonadherence to the care plan was the most important contributor to hospital admission; however, reasons for nonadherence were complex and multifactorial. The data highlight the importance of patient education for the purposes of condition management, timeliness of care, and effective communication between providers and patients. CONCLUSION: To improve the consistency and quality of care for patients with heart failure, more effective relationships among patients, providers, and caregivers are needed. Providers must be pragmatic when educating patients and their caregivers about heart failure, its treatment, and its prognosis.
Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Heart Failure/psychology , Inpatients/psychology , Insurance, Health/standards , Patient Compliance/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Inpatients/education , Insurance, Health/economics , Interviews as Topic , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Midwestern United States , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Patient Readmission/economics , Patient Readmission/standards , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Qualitative Research , Risk Factors , Self Care/psychology , Self Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Survivors of childhood cancer frequently experience cancer-related cognitive dysfunction, commonly months to years after treatment for pediatric brain tumors, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or tumors involving the head and neck. Risk factors for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction include young age at diagnosis, treatment with cranial irradiation, use of parenteral or intrathecal methotrexate, female sex, and pre-existing comorbidities. Limiting use and reducing doses and volume of cranial irradiation while intensifying chemotherapy have improved survival and reduced the severity of cognitive dysfunction, especially in leukemia. Nonetheless, problems in core functional domains of attention, processing speed, working memory and visual-motor integration continue to compromise quality of life and performance. We review the epidemiology, pathophysiology and assessment of cancer-related cognitive dysfunction, the impact of treatment changes for prevention, and the broad strategies for educational and pharmacological interventions to remediate established cognitive dysfunction following childhood cancer. The increased years of life saved after childhood cancer warrants continued study toward the prevention and remediation of cancer-related cognitive dysfunction, using uniform assessments anchored in functional outcomes.
