Health inequities and socioeconomic factors predicting the access to treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the USA in the last 20 years: interaction effect of race, gender, and insurance.

BACKGROUND: The literature suggests that minority racial and ethnic groups have lower treatment rates for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). It is uncertain how these disparities have changed over time. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample database covering 97% of the USA population was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 213 350 treated patients with UIA were included in the final analysis and compared with 173 375 treated patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) over the years 2000-2019. The mean (SD) age of the UIA and aSAH groups was 56.8 (12.6) years and 54.3 (14.1) years, respectively. In the UIA group, 60.7% were white patients, 10.2% were black patients, 8.6% were Hispanic, 2% were Asian or Pacific Islander, 0.5% were Native Americans, and 2.8% were others. The aSAH group comprised 48.5% white patients, 13.6% black patients, 11.2% Hispanics, 3.6% Asian or Pacific Islanders, 0.4% Native Americans, and 3.7% others. After adjusting for covariates, black patients (OR 0.637, 95% CI 0.625 to 0.648) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.654, 95% CI 0.641 to 0.667) had lower odds of treatment compared with white patients. Medicare patients had higher odds of treatment than private patients, while Medicaid and uninsured patients had lower odds. Interaction analysis showed that non-white/Hispanic patients with any insurance/no insurance had lower treatment odds than white patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the treatment odds of black patients has improved slightly over time, while the odds for Hispanic patients and other minorities have remained the same over time. CONCLUSION: This study from 2000 to 2019 shows that disparities in the treatment of UIA have persisted but have slightly improved over time for black patients while remaining constant for Hispanic patients and other minority groups.

Primary Tumors of the Posterior Pituitary Gland: A Systematic Review of the Literature in Light of the New 2017 World Health Organization Classification of Pituitary Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The rare clinical entity of primary posterior pituitary tumors (PPTs) includes pituicytomas, granular cell tumors, spine cell oncocytomas, and sellar ependymomas. The recent World Health Organization classification of PPTs based on thyroid transcription factor 1 positivity has led to more investigations into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, nature history, histologic features, and operative characteristics of these tumors. The aim of this review is to summarize the characteristics of primary PPTs. METHODS: Our summary involved an in-depth review of the literature on PPTs. Our systematic review was carried out using the PubMed database and PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: An initial search identified 282 publications. After strict application of the inclusion criteria, we found 16 articles for case series of patients with primary PPT (N > 5), which were included in our table for literature review. An additional 10 articles were review articles on PPTs published in the last 20 years and were used as resource for our systematic review. An extensive analysis was then performed to extract relevant clinical data with respect to the clinical radiologic histopathologic profile of primary PPTs and their treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Primary PPTs are a rare group of pituicyte-derived low-grade nonneuroendocrine neoplasms that arise from the sellar region. The nondescript radiographic findings and subtle endocrine abnormalities also veil their accurate diagnostic prediction. As shown through the narrative as well as the literature review, there is still a lot to be understood about PPTs. A prospective multicenter registry of these rare tumors would benefit both the neurosurgical as well as the endocrinologic knowledge base.

The Reproducibility of Cerebrovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relevant to the cerebrovascular field have been performed. The fragility index was recently developed to complement the P value and measure the robustness and reproducibility of clinical findings of RCTs. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluate the fragility index for key surgical and endovascular cerebrovascular RCTs and propose a novel RCT classification system based on the fragility index. METHODS: Cerebrovascular RCTs reported between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed. Six key areas were specifically targeted in relation to stroke, carotid stenosis, cerebral aneurysms, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. The correlation between fragility index, number of patients lost to follow-up, and fragility quotient were evaluated to propose a classification system for the robustness of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs that reported significant differences between both study groups in terms of the primary outcome were included. The median fragility index for the trials was 5.5. An additional 30 randomly selected RCTs were added to propose a classification system with high reliability. The difference between the number of patients lost to follow-up and fragility index inversely correlated with the fragility quotient and was used to divide the robustness of the RCTs into 3 classes reflecting the reproducibility of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeons and neurointerventionalists should exercise caution with interpreting the results of cerebrovascular RCTs, especially when the sample size and events numbers are small and there is a high number of patients who were lost to follow-up, as quantitatively identified using the proposed classification system.

Cerebral Revascularization for Moyamoya Syndrome Associated with Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Role of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass in Treating Neurologic Manifestations of Pediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.

Moyamoya syndrome (MMS) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) accentuates the risk of recurrent strokes. Chronic transfusion therapy (CTT) is an excellent option for preventing recurrent strokes in most patients with SCD. In SCD with MMS, CTT may fail as a long-term solution. Cerebral revascularization, in the form of extracranial-intracranial bypass, has been shown to prevent recurrent strokes in this cohort. We review the evolution of this paradigm shift in the management of SCD-associated MMS. A systematic review, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, was conducted. Our primary objectives were 1) to study the evolution of cerebral revascularization techniques in management of MMS in SCD and 2) to analyze the impact of neurosurgical intervention in this high-risk population. Four patients with SCD-associated MMS, who underwent indirect cerebral revascularization at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. A summary of 13 articles chronicling the advent and subsequent evolution of cerebral revascularization as a viable treatment strategy for stroke prevention in SCD-associated MMS is presented. The literature review suggests that early detection and surgical intervention (in addition to CTT) could significantly reduce stroke recurrence and improve neurocognitive outcome. Our short series of 4 patients also had a good outcome and no recurrence of strokes postoperatively. The literature emphasizes the use of a traditional standardized protocol for early identification (transcranial Dopplers, selective magnetic resonance angiography, and CTT). Early treatment and screening that involves early magnetic resonance angiography and referral to neurosurgery for revascularization may be considered for this high-risk population.