Prospectively Collected Comparison of Outcomes Between Surgically and Conservatively Treated Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter registry. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in an operative cohort of patients (OP) and compare them with a matched nonoperative cohort (NON). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Historically, the surgical outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been radiographically evaluated. However, the importance of HRQOL measures and their impact on surgical outcomes are increasingly being understood. METHODS: We identified 90 NON patients with curves in the operative range who were observed for at least 2 years. These patients were matched with an OP cohort of 689 patients. All patients completed the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire at the initial evaluation and at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Subgroup comparisons were based on curve type: primary thoracic (Th), primary thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L), and double major (DM) curves. RESULTS: The preoperative major curves in the Th, TL/L, and DM OP subgroups averaged 50.4°, 45.4°, and 51.5°, respectively, and 49.4°, 43.7°, and 48.9° in the NON cohort (P > 0.05). At 2 years postoperatively, the major curve in the Th, TL/L, and DM OP subgroups improved to 19.0°, 19.2°, and 19.3°, respectively, compared to the progression to 51.3°, 44.5°, and 49.7° in the NON group at 2-year follow-up (P < 0.05). The SRS-22 self-image, mental health, satisfaction, and total scores at the 2-year follow-up were significantly better in all OP subgroups (P < 0.001) but remained largely unchanged in the NON group. A significant percentage of patients (P < 0.001) in the OP cohort reported better SRS-22 scores at the 2-year follow-up in the self-image, mental health, and satisfaction domains than the NON group at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgically treated patients with AIS have improved HRQOL outcomes in several domains compared to age- and curve magnitude-matched nonoperatively treated patients at 2-year follow-up.

Imaging and Laboratory Workup for Hand Infections.

Hand infections can lead to significant morbidity if not treated promptly. Most of these infections, such as abscesses, tenosynovitis, cellulitis, and necrotizing fasciitis, can be diagnosed clinically. Laboratory values, such as white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and recently, procalcitonin and interleukin-6, are helpful in supporting the diagnosis and trending disease progression. Radiographs should be obtained in all cases of infection. Ultrasound is a dynamic study that can provide quick evaluation of deeper structures but is operator dependent. Computed tomographic and MRI studies are useful for evaluating deep space or bony infections and preoperative surgical planning.

Length of stay and 30-day readmissions after isolated humeral shaft fracture open reduction and internal fixation compared to intramedullary nailing.

INTRODUCTION: Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) have similar union rates for treating humerus shaft fractures, but IMN leads to increased incidence of shoulder impingement and reoperation. The difference in 30-day readmission rate and length of stay (LOS) between these procedures is unknown. The objective of the study was to compare 30-day unplanned readmissions and length of stay between humeral shaft fractures fixed with either ORIF or IMN. METHODS: The nationwide readmissions database (NRD) was queried for patients with humeral shaft fractures treated with ORIF or IMN between 2015-2016. IMN cases were propensity matched to ORIF cases based on demographic and co-morbid variables. Multivariable logistic regression determined if treatment modality was an independent risk factor for 30-day readmission or length of stay >3 days. RESULTS: There were 406 patients treated with IMN matched to 406 patients treated with ORIF. The 30-day readmission rate was 6.4% for IMN and 4.9% for ORIF (p = 0.45), and the median LOS was 3 days for each group (p = 0.45). Congestive heart failure (CHF)(OR=2.7, p = 0.04), depression (OR=3.3, p = 0.0008), and electrolyte abnormality (OR=3.6, p = 0.0003) were independent risk factors for readmission. Older age (OR=1.02, p = 0.03), CHF (OR=2.4, p = 0.03), electrolyte abnormality (OR=2.6, p = 0.0001), obesity (OR=2.8, p<0.0001), Medicaid (OR=2.1, p = 0.04), discharge to a facility (OR = 5.2, p<0.0001), discharge with home health services (OR=2.4, p = 0.0003), and open fracture (OR=2.3, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for LOS >3 days. Procedure (ORIF vs. IMN) was not a predictor of 30-day readmission or LOS >3 days. CONCLUSION: Comorbid conditions are risk factors for 30-day readmission and increased LOS. Comorbidity, discharge disposition, and open fractures are risk factors for increased LOS. Treating humeral shaft fractures with either ORIF or IMN did not affect readmission or length of stay.

Predictors of the need for critical care after total joint arthroplasty: an update of our institutional risk stratification model.

Based on our previously published risk stratification model, 295 (19%) of a consecutive series of 1594 TJA patients were triaged to the ICU. However, only 67 patients (22%) required intensive care interventions. We identified 5 independent multivariate predictors (P < 0.001) including COPD, CAD, CHF (1 point each), EBL > 1000 mL, and intraoperative vasopressors (2 points each) to form the Penn Arthroplasty Risk Score (PARS). Patients with a score of 0 through 7 had a probability of requiring critical care of 7.0%, 13.2%, 23.5%, 38.1%, 55.4%, 71.4%, 83.4%, and 91.1% respectively. Based on these results, our previous risk stratification protocol is overly sensitive and non-specific. Any risk stratification algorithm for ICU admission should include intraoperative risk factors in order to be fully predictive.