1-Year clinical outcomes of diabeticpatients treated with everolimus-elutingbioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treatedwith the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS).Background Clinical outcomes of diabetic patients after BVS implantation have been unreported.Methods This study included 101 patients in the ABSORB Cohort B trial and the first consecutive 450patients with 1 year of follow-up in the ABSORB EXTEND trial. A total of 136 diabetic patients werecompared with 415 nondiabetic patients. In addition, 882 diabetic patients treated with everolimuselutingmetal stents (EES) in pooled data from the SPIRIT trials (SPIRIT FIRST [Clinical Trial of the AbbottVascular XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System], SPIRIT II [A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCEV Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System], SPIRIT III [Clinical Trial of the XIENCE V Everolimus ElutingCoronary Stent System (EECSS)], SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial [Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V EverolimusEluting Coronary Stent System]) were used for the comparison by applying propensity score matching.The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE), including cardiac death, targetvessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up.Results The cumulative incidence of DoCE did not differ between diabetic and nondiabetic patientstreated with the BVS (3.7% vs. 5.1%, p » 0.64). Diabetic patients treated with the BVS had a similarincidence of the DoCE compared with diabetic patients treated with EES in the matched study group(3.9% for the BVS vs. 6.4% for EES, p » 0.38). There were no differences in the incidence of definite orprobable scaffold/stent thrombosis (0.7% for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients with the BVS; 1.0%for diabetic patients with the BVS vs. 1.7% for diabetic patients with EES in the matched study group).Conclusions In the present analyses, diabetic patients treated with the BVS showed...

Virtual histology: a window to the heart of atherosclerosis.

Intravascular ultrasound has done much to improve our understanding of atherosclerosis and the impact of percutaneous intervention on the coronary artery. However, subjectivity in interpreting the acoustic reflection of the ultrasound signal has spawned the development of other progressive technologies. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VHIVUS) utilises the ultrasound backscatter signal in order to colour code plaque into four pre-specified subtypes based on their histological composition. We review the background behind traditional grey scale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and examine the current evidence for VHIVUS and its potential for use in clinical interventional practice.

Integrated coronary physiology in percutaneous intervention: a new paradigm in interventional cardiology.

Coronary angiography has provided an unrivalled appreciation of coronary anatomy fostering a far greater appreciation of the extent of atherosclerotic disease. However, the subjectivity of coronary angiography at determining the extent of plaque has been exposed with IVUS. Indices of coronary physiology have provided valuable adjunctive information as to the physiological importance of specific lesions. Fractional flow reserve is an established method for evaluating the significance of epicardial stenoses. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved outcomes when compared to a conventional angiographic guided strategy, particularly in intermediate lesions. The use of coronary physiology in the cath lab represents a new avenue to guide appropriate patient specific revascularisation strategies. This review examines the theory and evidence for fractional flow reserve and its use in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Widespread vascular production of C-reactive protein (CRP) and a relationship between serum CRP, plaque CRP and intimal hypertrophy.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence of local vascular production and a relationship between serum hsCRP levels and tissue expression of CRP in subjects with vascular disease would support a direct role for CRP in atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Vascular tissue from subjects undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABGS) (n=28) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (n=25) were studied. Histological samples were assessed for intima-media ratio (IMR) and CRP by immunohistochemistry. CRP mRNA was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. CRP mRNA was seen in all plaques, non-atherosclerotic artery and atrium but no difference in mRNA expression was seen between plaque and non-atherosclerotic tissue. Serum hsCRP correlated with IMR (r=0.64, p=0.001) in non-atherosclerotic arteries and with plaque CRP staining (r=0.57, p=0.009) independent of age, BMI, lipids, diabetes and blood pressure. In a separate patient series, serum hsCRP was measured in aortic and coronary sinus blood from subjects undergoing CABGS or angiography (n=54). There was a coronary circulation hsCRP gradient ([mean+/-S.E.M.] aortic CRP 4.3mg/l+/-0.8 versus coronary sinus 5.8+/-1.2mg/l, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Widespread vascular CRP mRNA expression, a correlation between serum hsCRP, intimal hypertrophy and plaque CRP, and a coronary hsCRP gradient suggest vascular secretion may contribute to serum CRP levels.

C reactive protein for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes? Verdict: unproven.

Although C reactive protein is intimately involved with the pathogenic mechanisms that drive acute coronary syndromes, there is no evidence that it is helpful for identifying patient groups who might benefit from particular treatment strategies

Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a measure of coronary stenosis severity that is based on pressure measurements obtained at maximal hyperemia. The most widely used pharmacologic stimulus for maximal coronary hyperemia is adenosine, administered either as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion or intracoronary (IC) bolus. IV adenosine has more side effects and is more costly than IC adenosine but has a more stable and prolonged hyperemic effect. METHODS: We compared the efficacy of IC and IV adenosine administration for the measurement of FFR in a multicenter trial. Fifty-two patients with 60 lesions underwent determination of FFR with both IV and IC adenosine. IV adenosine was administered as a continuous infusion at a rate of 140 microgram/kg per minute until a steady state hyperemia was achieved. IC adenosine boluses were administered at a dose of 15 to 20 microgram in the right and 18 to 24 microgram in the left coronary artery. FFR was calculated as the ratio of the distal coronary pressure (from pressure guide wire) to the aortic pressure (guide catheter) at maximal hyperemia. RESULTS: A total of 26 left anterior descending, 23 right, 9 left circumflex, and 3 left main coronary arteries were evaluated. Mean percent stenosis for both groups was 55.8% +/- 23.6% (range 0% to 95%), and mean FFR was 0.78 +/- 0.15 (range 0.41 to 0.98). There was a strong and linear correlation between FFR measurements with IV and IC adenosine (R = 0.978, y = 0. 032 + 0.964x, P <.001). The agreement between the 2 sets of measurements was also high, with a mean difference in FFR of -0.004 +/- 0.03. However, a small random scatter in both directions of FFR measurements was noted with 5 lesions (8.3%) where FFR with IC adenosine was higher by 0.05 or more compared with IV infusions, suggesting a suboptimal hyperemic response in these patients. Changes in heart rate and blood pressure were significantly higher with IV adenosine. Two patients with IV, but none with IC adenosine, had severe side effects (bronchospasm and severe nausea). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that IC adenosine is equivalent to IV infusion for the determination of FFR in the majority of patients. However, in a small percentage of cases, coronary hyperemia was suboptimal with IC adenosine.

Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5'-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics.

BACKGROUND: Measurements of Doppler derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) and pressure derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) for coronary stenosis assessment depend on the induction of maximal hyperemia. Adenosine is the most widely used pharmacological agent but is expensive and poorly tolerated by some patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The objective of this study was to test the equivalency of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine in their ability to cause maximal hyperemia as compared with the hyperemic response of complete coronary occlusion in 6 canines. Intracoronary administration of either ATP or adenosine resulted in a significant increase in CFR (2.79+/-0.64 and 2.22+/-0.7 for 10 microgram versus 4. 65+/-1.22 and 4.25+/-0.78 for 100 microgram for ATP and adenosine, respectively, P for trend <0.001) but not reaching the level of coronary occlusion (6.35+/-2.26). Additionally, FFR and CFR were measured in 35 different stenoses using ATP, adenosine, and coronary occlusion. There was an excellent linear correlation between ATP and adenosine for both CFR (R=0.934, P<0.001) and FFR (R=0.985, P<0.001). However, hyperemia with either ATP or adenosine was less than postocclusion hyperemia, resulting in significantly different reserve measurements (CFR: 1.93+/-0.66 and 2.08+/-0.81 versus 2.35+/-0.97, P<0.001; FFR: 0.62+/-0.24 and 0.63+/-0.23 versus 0.58+/-0.2, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Step up in dosage of ATP and adenosine beyond currently recommended clinical doses resulted in a significant increase in coronary hyperemia; 2) ATP was equivalent to adenosine for both CFR and FFR; and 3) complete coronary occlusion yielded a better hyperemic response than either drug, indicating that maximal hyperemia was not achieved by either pharmacological stimulus.

The stent decade: 1987 to 1997. Stanford Stent Summit faculty.

In January 1997, experts from the United States, Europe, and Japan gathered at Stanford University to review their collective experience with intracoronary and noncoronary stenting and to identify and prioritize issues requiring further clinical investigation. This report summarizes the discussions that took place during this stent summit. Knowledge of stent-tissue interaction from animal and human pathologic specimens was reviewed in the context of evolving stent designs. The relative merits of coil and slotted tubular stent designs were discussed. Stent deployment routines, including self-expansion, balloon expansion, and high-pressure delivery were debated. The potential for covered stents and coated stents was explored. Problems surrounding the routine deployment of stents were identified: small vessel disease, long lesions, bifurcation stenoses, vein graft disease, ostial disease, left main stenoses, and intrastent restenosis. The value of intravascular ultrasound, as an adjunct to stenting, was explored and debated. An algorithm for "provisional stenting" based on ultrasound criteria was developed. Noncoronary stenting of the aorta, iliacs, and carotids were discussed. Clinical applications that may lead to randomized clinical trials were identified.

Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

The use of thrombolytic therapy has been widely accepted for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Despite improving mortality, thrombolytic therapy may be contraindicated in many patients presenting with myocardial infarction and is associated with a small, yet significant risk of hemorrhagic sequelae. This article outlines the rationale behind reperfusion therapy, the use of pharmacological thrombolysis and the role of adjunctive angioplasty. The potential advantages of a therapeutic strategy of primary angioplasty, instead of thrombolysis, are discussed. These include anatomical definition, risk stratification, reduced recurrent ischemia, enhanced coronary perfusion and improved coronary patency. The randomized trials in which primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy were compared are reviewed. We conclude that angioplasty results in a reduction of short-term mortality and nonfatal reinfarction and therefore advocate the routine use of coronary angioplasty as a primary reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction. The potential limitations of primary angioplasty in the community hospital setting are discussed. Finally, we examine the roles of adjunctive mechanical (e.g. stents) and pharmacological (e.g. Abciximab) means of further enhancing outcomes after primary angioplasty.

Pattern of renal cortical scarring after experimental papillary necrosis.

Three types of renal cortical damage were found in rats 2 mth after papillary necrosis had been induced by ethylenimine: (1) Circumscribed areas of interstitial nephritis affecting either deep or superficial nephrons. (2) Wedge-shaped or conical scars, extending from capsule to inner medulla. (3) Widespread tubular dilatation and cyst formation with a diffuse increase in interstitial tissue, usually associated with dense fibrous repair of the papillary remnant. The extent and character of the cortical changes did not appear to be determined by the severity of the papillary necrosis, and even the more severe cortical lesions were not accompanied by any major reduction in kidney size. Although these chronic experimental cortical lesions are the products of a less complex and less protracted natural history than end stage cortical damage in analgesic nephropathy, some of the factors influencing their evolution, such as infection, may also determine the natural history of the clinical lesion.