Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Urol ; 197(4): 1006-1013, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27871928

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Dutasteride, which is licensed for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, has been associated with a lower progression rate of low risk prostate cancer. We evaluated the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume as assessed by T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial, men with biopsy proven, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer (up to Gleason 3 + 4 and PSA up to 15 ng/ml) who had visible lesion of 0.2 ml or greater on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences were randomized to daily dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo for 6 months. Lesion volume was assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months with image guided biopsy to the lesion at study exit. The primary end point was the percent reduction in lesion volume over 6 months. This trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials register (EudraCT 2009-102405-18). RESULTS: A total of 42 men were recruited between June 2010 and January 2012. In the dutasteride group, the average volumes at baseline and 6 months were 0.55 and 0.38 ml, respectively and the average reduction was 36%. In the placebo group, the average volumes at baseline and 6 months were 0.65 and 0.76 ml, respectively, and the average reduction was -12%. The difference in percent reductions between the groups was 48% (95% CI 27.4-68.3, p <0.0001). The most common adverse event was deterioration in erectile function, which was 25% in men randomized to dutasteride and 16% in men randomized to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Dutasteride was associated with a significant reduction in prostate cancer volume on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared to placebo.


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dutasteride/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Dutasteride/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Burden/drug effects
2.
J Neuroimaging ; 22(1): 28-32, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21091816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder the pathophysiology of which is incompletely understood. Four studies have examined structural differences between the brains of RLS patients and healthy controls, using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). All 4 studies have provided different results. METHODS: Optimized VBM was used to search for structural differences in gray matter density. Sixteen RLS patients naïve to dopaminergic drugs and 16 age- and sex-matched controls received structural T1-weighted MR scans. Structural data were analyzed using FSL-VBM. RESULTS: No difference in gray matter density was detected between the two groups (voxel-wise significance: no significant voxels at P= .89 (whole brain Family Wise Error (FWE) corrected); no significant voxels at P < .05 (whole brain False Discovery Rate (FDR) corrected; smallest achievable FDR threshold .99). CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: The present study did not replicate (confirm) previous findings of structural brain changes in RLS, but instead supported the findings of a recent study showing a lack of gray matter alteration in an elderly RLS population. More specifically, the results do not support neuronal loss as an underlying disease mechanism in RLS. Potential limitations in the application of VBM are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neurons/pathology , Restless Legs Syndrome/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16686044

ABSTRACT

This paper assesses the estimation of kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Asymptotic results from likelihood-based nonlinear regression are compared with results derived from the posterior distribution using Bayesian estimation, along with the output from an established software package (MRIW). By using the estimated error from kinetic parameters, it is possible to produce more accurate clinical statistics, such as tumor size, for patients with breast tumors. Further analysis has also shown that Bayesian methods are more accurate and do not suffer from convergence problems, but at a higher computational cost.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Gadolinium DTPA/pharmacokinetics , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Models, Biological , Computer Simulation , Contrast Media/pharmacokinetics , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Models, Statistical , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...