Overdoses and Substance Toxicity in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units in a Midwestern U.S. City.

Toxic exposures with serious outcomes have increased over the last decade. Limited data exists on the pattern and outcomes of overdose-exposure patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary objective of this study was to characterize the causes, treatments, and outcomes of toxic exposures in a mid-sized Midwestern health system. The secondary objective was to report cumulative economic costs associated with these patients. Data were obtained from medical records of patients 18 years or older with a diagnosis code of overdose admitted to the ICU at 2 teaching hospitals between August 1, 2012, and July 31, 2014. There were 470 (10%) of the 4,495 total ICU admissions that met inclusion criteria during the study period. Average patient age was 39 (SD = 14.2) years, with 64% females. Intentional overdose exposure was the cause of 87% of admissions. The majority (70%) of exposures involved multiple pharmacological agents, including ethanol. Most patients did not require therapeutic maneuvers, nor used decontamination methods. Primary substance classes included analgesics, benzodiazepines, ethanol, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, and methamphetamine. Two hundred sixty-five (56%) patients were ICU to direct home discharges, whereas 198 (42%) were transferred to a lower level of care. The mortality rate in the sample was 1%. Average hospital charges per admission were $20,375 and average ICU charges were $5,284, which summed to more than $2 million in total charges. Causes, treatments, and outcomes of toxic exposures admitted to the ICU in a mid-sized Midwestern city reveal a potential ICU burden. Financial health care costs associated with these toxic exposures were substantial. Greater public health efforts are needed to attempt to minimize preventable admissions and better understand antecedents.

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF): Its Mechanisms and Effects on Range of Motion and Muscular Function.

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) is common practice for increasing range of motion, though little research has been done to evaluate theories behind it. The purpose of this study was to review possible mechanisms, proposed theories, and physiological changes that occur due to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques. Four theoretical mechanisms were identified: autogenic inhibition, reciprocal inhibition, stress relaxation, and the gate control theory. The studies suggest that a combination of these four mechanisms enhance range of motion. When completed prior to exercise, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation decreases performance in maximal effort exercises. When this stretching technique is performed consistently and post exercise, it increases athletic performance, along with range of motion. Little investigation has been done regarding the theoretical mechanisms of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, though four mechanisms were identified from the literature. As stated, the main goal of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation is to increase range of motion and performance. Studies found both of these to be true when completed under the correct conditions. These mechanisms were found to be plausible; however, further investigation needs to be conducted. All four mechanisms behind the stretching technique explain the reasoning behind the increase in range of motion, as well as in strength and athletic performance. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation shows potential benefits if performed correctly and consistently.