Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 59(1): 6-11, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8661976

ABSTRACT

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have studied the effects of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover over a period of 2 years. Our study comprised 117 Caucasian postmenopausal women, otherwise healthy apart from reduced bone density. They received either intranasal synthetic SCT (200 IU either three times weekly or daily) or placebo. Compared with placebo, daily intranasal calcitonin resulted in no significant bone loss in the lumbar spine, as assessed by dual photon absorptiometry, over the 2-year study period (P < 0.02). In this group, women more than 5 years postmenopause, with the lowest baseline bone mass, showed the greatest response to this treatment, with a total increase placebo in lumbar spine BMD of 3.1%. Significant spinal bone loss (P < 0.005) occurred in women receiving either placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin. Although the rates of bone loss in the proximal femur were not significantly different in the three groups, there were differences over time. Whereas bone loss in the daily calcitonin group was insignificant, women who received placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin experienced significant bone loss (P < 0. 001). No significant changes in biochemical markers were observed in any group. Therapy was well tolerated and there were no significant treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that intranasal SCT 200 IU daily is effective and safe for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women with reduced bone mass.


Subject(s)
Calcitonin/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Resorption , Consumer Product Safety , Double-Blind Method , Female , Femur , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Spine
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 84(2): 222-6, 1994 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8041534

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To see whether the short-term changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations induced by postmenopausal estrogen-progestin therapy are maintained in the long term. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy postmenopausal women were randomized to either oral therapy (continuous conjugated equine estrogens at 0.625 mg/day with sequential dl-norgestrel at 0.15 mg/day for 12 days each cycle) or transdermal therapy (patches delivering continuous 17 beta-estradiol [E2] at 0.05 mg/day with sequential norethindrone acetate at 0.25 mg/day for 14 days each cycle). Twenty-nine healthy postmenopausal women who did not request therapy served as a reference group. Fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were monitored for 3 years. RESULTS: Studied in the estrogen-progestin phase, oral and transdermal therapies reduced serum total cholesterol concentrations by 12.1% (P < .001) and 8.4% (P < .001), respectively, and those of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) by 14.2% (P < .001) and 6.6% (P < .01), respectively. These changes, apparent at 3 months, were maintained over 3 years. Serum triglyceride concentrations fell by 2.5% (P < .05) and 16.4% (P < .01), respectively. These decreases were evident after 6 months in both groups but were maintained over 3 years only in the transdermal group. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations fell in women given oral therapy (7.8%, P < .05) and transdermal therapy (10.7%, P < .001), as well as in untreated women (7.0%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The potentially beneficial effects of estrogen-progestin therapy on serum total and LDL cholesterol and on triglycerides were maintained over 3 years. Interpretation of the potentially detrimental effects on HDL concentrations was hindered by the changes seen in untreated women.


Subject(s)
Apolipoproteins B/drug effects , Cholesterol/blood , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Postmenopause/blood , Postmenopause/drug effects , Triglycerides/blood , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Alprostadil/blood , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, HDL/drug effects , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/drug effects , Dinoprostone/blood , Estradiol/pharmacology , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/methods , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Norethindrone/analogs & derivatives , Norethindrone/pharmacology , Norethindrone Acetate , Norgestrel/pharmacology , Time Factors
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 83(1): 19-23, 1994 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8272301

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy with desogestrel and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) on serum lipids and lipoproteins. METHODS: Fifty-seven healthy postmenopausal women of less than 60 years of age were studied prospectively and treated with oral desogestrel 0.15 mg/day and micronized 17 beta-E2 1 mg/day, both taken continuously. Fasting venous blood samples for serum lipids and lipoproteins were taken before and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-two women completed the study. Levels of all serum lipids and lipoproteins fell significantly by 6 months and remained low at 12 months. The mean percentage reduction after 12 months of treatment was 12.8% for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, which largely resulted from a reduction in the HDL2 subfraction, which fell by 25.7%. The mean percentage reduction for both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides was 7.7%. The median percentage reduction for lipoprotein (a) was 17.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of hormone replacement therapy had profound effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins. According to current concepts, reductions in total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein (a) may reduce cardiovascular disease risk. The reduction in HDL was unexpected, given the rise in HDL that has been demonstrated when desogestrel is combined with ethinyl estradiol in the contraceptive pill. The lowering of HDL observed in this study is undesirable and may be potentially harmful. Our results indicate that when desogestrel 0.15 mg/day is combined with micronized 17 beta-E2 1 mg/day in a continuous manner, the effects of the progestogen on HDL predominate and cause a reduction in HDL and the HDL2 subfraction.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol, HDL/drug effects , Cholesterol, LDL/drug effects , Desogestrel/pharmacology , Estradiol/pharmacology , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Lipoproteins/drug effects , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Desogestrel/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Estradiol/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Lipoproteins/blood , Middle Aged , Postmenopause , Prospective Studies
4.
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud ; 38 Suppl 2: 88-91, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8252111

ABSTRACT

In a 3-year study comparing oral and transdermal HRT, we measured bone density in the spine and proximal femur by dual-photon absorptiometry. Sixty-six women were randomly allocated to receive either oral conjugated equine oestrogens, 0.625 mg daily, together with cyclical oral dl-norgestrel, 0.15 mg daily, or transdermal 17 beta-oestradiol, 0.05 mg daily, together with cyclical transdermal norethisterone acetate, 0.25 mg daily. We found that only 2% showed significant vertebral bone loss on either treatment, whilst approximately 12% lost from the proximal femur. Compliance was demonstrated by monitoring all used patches and pill packets, recording all side effects and bleeding patterns, and by the demonstration of appropriate changes in levels of gonadal steroids and lipoproteins. Comparing the bone losers with the ten highest gainers, lowers were closer to their menopause but were not different in body mass or life style. Serum oestradiol levels were similar, and both groups showed a similar response in terms of changes in bone biochemical markers and lipoproteins in response to HRT. In thus seems that a small proportion of women do not conserve bone density in the proximal femur with standard doses of HRT. It remains to be determined whether they could be identified by more specific biochemical markers of bone turnover, and whether they would maintain with a higher dose of oestrogen.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Bone Density , Calcium/blood , Calcium/urine , Creatinine/urine , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Estradiol/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hydroxyproline/urine , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Norethindrone/administration & dosage , Norethindrone/analogs & derivatives , Norethindrone/therapeutic use , Norethindrone Acetate , Norgestrel/administration & dosage , Norgestrel/therapeutic use , Phosphates/blood , Progesterone Congeners/administration & dosage , Progesterone Congeners/therapeutic use
6.
Br Med Bull ; 48(2): 401-25, 1992 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1450877

ABSTRACT

Various forms of oestrogen have been available for use as Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) for approximately 50 years. However, there has been little change in the mode of administration until the last 10-15 years. Although the oral route has remained the mainstay of therapy, non-oral routes of administration have been developed. During the 1970s it became clear that use of unopposed oestrogens in women with an intact uterus resulted in an increase in risk of endometrial carcinoma and thus the current practice of adding a sequential progestogen each month, to prevent endometrial hyperplasia, was introduced. However, certain progestogens can cause side-effects and some of the metabolic changes which they induce are potentially undesirable. Thus the search continues for new oral progestogens which are more 'metabolically friendly' than those in current use. Additionally, non-oral delivery systems for progestogens have been studied, such as the transdermal route (patches) and local administration within the uterine cavity (progestogen-containing intra-uterine devices). Both these strategies may minimise their symptomatic, psychological and metabolic effects. Continuous (every day) administration of progestogens in combination with the oestrogen, or the use of new compounds (e.g. tibolone) may overcome the problem of regular withdrawal bleeding which some women find unacceptable. However, it remains to be determined whether such therapies are as efficacious as conventional oestrogen/sequential progesterone regimens.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy/methods , Estrogens/administration & dosage , Progestins/administration & dosage , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Drug Combinations , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Estrogens/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Devices , Middle Aged , Progestins/adverse effects
8.
Fertil Steril ; 56(3): 574-6, 1991 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1894039

ABSTRACT

Whole body lean and fat mass measurements by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry were performed in 14 premenopausal women undergoing danazol treatment for endometriosis. After 6 months, there was a significant increase in lean tissue mass. Body fat decreased but this was significantly less in the android (upper body segment) region than in the gynoid (lower body segment) region. Danazol thus has both anabolic and androgenic effects on body composition. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry provides a new, noninvasive, and rapid means of studying body composition.


Subject(s)
Body Composition/drug effects , Danazol/therapeutic use , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Adipose Tissue/pathology , Adult , Anthropometry/methods , Body Mass Index , Body Weight/drug effects , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...