Introducing LAPPS (Liverpool Anticipatory Procedural Pain Score): the pragmatic development of an innovative approach to predicting and treating procedural pain and distress in children.

Removal of chest drains is a painful procedure and distresses patients, parents and nurses. To identify problems and improve management we developed a concerted approach to both assessment and treatment using audit. An initial prospective audit of post-op cardiac children undergoing chest drain +/- pacing wire removal was undertaken. A clinical tool was developed, to assess children before procedures and provide a treatment plan aimed at reducing pain and distress. The tool incorporated the intensity of the procedure, the child's usual response to procedures and previous experience. The treatment protocol included drug and non-drug therapies. The initial audit of 91 children confirmed that pain and distress were problems. It highlighted inconsistencies in management as a common feature. Following introduction of the LAPPS tool and treatment protocol, a second audit of 72 children was undertaken. Although only 46 per cent of pathways were satisfactorily completed, the percentage of patients described as 'inconsolable, screaming and withdrawn' reduced from 29 per cent to 9 per cent. Introduction of the LAPPS assessment tool and treatment protocol reduced pain and distress during removal of chest drains. Research is needed to test the psychometrics of the tool and the effectiveness of the treatment protocol prior to wider use.

It is not what you do, it is the way that you do it: impact of a care pathway for appendicitis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. However, management varies widely. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of introducing a care pathway on the management of childhood appendicitis. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 3 successive cohorts: All patients operated for suspected appendicitis were included. The pathway was modified after interim analysis of group B data. P < .05 was significant. RESULTS: Six hundred patients were included. When compared with group A, group C patients were more likely to receive preoperative antibiotics (P < .0001), undergo formal pain assessment (P < .0001), and be operated before midnight (P = .025). There was a significant decrease in readmission rates from 10.0% to 4.2% (P = .023) despite an increase in cases of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis (P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a care pathway resulted in improved compliance with antibiotic regimens, more frequent pain assessment, and fewer post-midnight operations. Postappendicectomy readmission rates were reduced despite an increase in disease severity. This was achieved by critical reevaluation of outcomes and pathway redesign where appropriate.