Care without coverage: is there a relationship between insurance and ED care?

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has concluded that differences in care exist for hospitalized patients on the basis of insurance; we attempted to determine if these differences begin in the emergency department (ED). We retrospectively studied high-acuity adult visits to one ED over 6 months, utilizing electronic databases. Uninsured patients were more often younger, male, and non-white (n = 3899 visits; 468 uninsured, 3431 insured). Fewer uninsured patients were admitted (9.8% vs. 27.2% insured; p < 0.001). Comparing patients by admission status, there was no evidence of difference for most measures, excepting radiographic studies (admitted patients: 78.3% uninsured vs. 90.5% insured, p = 0.007; treated-and-released patients: 62.3% uninsured vs. 69.4% insured, p = 0.004). In a subset of trauma patients for whom acuity could be evaluated with Injury Severity Scores (ISS), admission rates were similar. In this pilot study of high-acuity patients, there was limited evidence of differences in most measures of ED-based patient care on the basis of insurance status.

Emergency department digital radiology: moving from photos to pixels.

Emergency department (ED) patient care relies heavily on radiologic imaging. As advances in technologic innovation continue to present opportunities to streamline and simplify the delivery of care, emergency medicine (EM) practitioners face the challenge of transitioning from a system of primarily film-based radiography to one that utilizes digitized images. The move to digital radiology can result in enhanced quality of patient care, reduction of errors, and increased ED efficiency; however, making this transition will necessarily involve changes in EM practice. As the technology evolves, digital radiology will gradually become ingrained into everyday practice because of these and other notable benefits; however, EM practitioners will need to overcome several challenges to make the transition smoothly and consider the potential impacts that this change will have on ED workflow. The authors discuss the benefits, challenges, and other operational considerations involved with the ED implementation of digital radiology and close by presenting guiding principles for current and future users. Despite the unresolved issues, digital radiology will mature as a technology and improve EM practice, making it one of the great information technology advances in EM.