Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 82(10): 1170-8, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17908523

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pharmacological component of a proprietary medical treatment program targeting type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor dysregulation in adults who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria for methamphetamine dependence. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A prospective, open-label, single-group study of the medication portion of a proprietary treatment program for methamphetamine dependence was conducted from July 1, 2005, to May 10, 2006, at Research Across America, an outpatient private, for-profit, clinical research company in Dallas, TX. In the study, flumazenil, hydroxyzine, and gabapentin, all of which were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for indications other than drug dependence, were used off-label for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Fifty persons who had used methamphetamine within 7 days of study entry were enrolled and received the treatment. Treatment lasted 4 weeks, followed by 8 weeks of weekly follow-up visits to monitor for methamphetamine use via urine drug tests and self-reporting. RESULTS: Participant retention was higher than expected, with 85% of participants completing the program. Significant decrease in methamphetamine use (P<.001) was noted at 84 days after vs 90 days before treatment. If missing data are counted as days of methamphetamine use, a 47% reduction in use was observed for the entire sample (P<.001) and a 65% reduction for the 36 who completed the 8-week evaluation phase (P<.001). Urine test results and self-reported use were positively correlated (Pearson r=0.72, P<.001). The frequency of cravings was reduced on average by 66% (P<.001), with 30 of 31 (97%) of the 36 who completed the study reporting reduction in cravings. CONCLUSION: Substantial reductions in methamphetamine cravings and use were observed in all phases of treatment, and the retention rate of participants was high. These findings suggest that the efficacy of the medications and of the entire program in treating methamphetamine dependence should be examined in controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Methamphetamine , Receptors, GABA/drug effects , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Amines/administration & dosage , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/administration & dosage , Female , Flumazenil/administration & dosage , Gabapentin , Humans , Hydroxyzine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Dropouts , Prospective Studies , Receptors, GABA/physiology , Substance-Related Disorders/physiopathology , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/administration & dosage
2.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 70(1): 29-37, 2003 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12681523

ABSTRACT

Modafinil is a novel compound that is approved for the treatment of narcolepsy. It is now being studied as a potential treatment for cocaine dependence. Cocaine withdrawal symptoms are associated with poor clinical outcome and are likely to be reversed by modafinil. In addition, the neurotransmitter actions of modafinil are opposite to cocaine-induced neuroadaptations affecting dopamine and glutamate reward circuits. Since cocaine-dependent subjects might use cocaine during a clinical trial with modafinil, this study tested the safety of intravenous cocaine (30 mg) in combination with modafinil. Each of seven subjects received a baseline (open-label) cocaine infusion. Three subsequent cocaine infusions were administered after subjects received 4 days of low dose modafinil (200 mg/day), high dose modafinil (400 mg/day), or placebo in randomized double-blind sequences. One subject received placebo prior to all infusions. Our results indicate that co-administering modafinil and a single dose of intravenous cocaine is not associated with medical risk in terms of blood pressure, pulse, temperature, or electrocardiogram measures. Furthermore, pretreatment with modafinil did not intensify cocaine euphoria or cocaine-induced craving. In fact, cocaine euphoria was significantly blunted (P=0.02) in one of our subjective measures.


Subject(s)
Benzhydryl Compounds/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Cocaine-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Cocaine/adverse effects , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Body Temperature/drug effects , Cocaine/pharmacokinetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Modafinil , Pulse
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...