Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Neural prostheses, such as cochlear and retinal implants, induce perceptual responses by electrically stimulating sensory nerves. These devices restore sensory system function by using patterned electrical stimuli to evoke neural responses. An understanding of their function requires knowledge of the nerves responses to relevant electrical stimuli as well as the likely effects of pathology on nerve function. We describe how sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) affects the response properties of single auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) to electrical stimuli relevant to cochlear implants. The response of 188 individual ANFs were recorded in response to trains of stimuli presented at 200, 1,000, 2,000, and 5,000 pulse/s in acutely and chronically deafened guinea pigs. The effects of stimulation rate and SNHL on ANF responses during the 0-2 ms period following stimulus onset were examined to minimize the influence of ANF adaptation. As stimulation rate increased to 5,000 pulse/s, threshold decreased, dynamic range increased and first spike latency decreased. Similar effects of stimulation rate were observed following chronic SNHL, although onset threshold and first spike latency were reduced and onset dynamic range increased compared with acutely deafened animals. Facilitation, defined as an increased nerve excitability caused by subthreshold stimulation, was observed in both acute and chronic SNHL groups, although the magnitude of its effect was diminished in the latter. These results indicate that facilitation, demonstrated here using stimuli similar to those used in cochlear implants, influences the ANF response to pulsatile electrical stimulation and may have important implications for cochlear implant signal processing strategies.

Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Here we characterized the relationship between duration of sensorineural hearing loss and the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulus rate. Electrophysiological recordings were made from undeafened guinea pigs and those ototoxically deafened for either 5 weeks or 6 months. Auditory neuron survival decreased significantly with the duration of deafness. Extracellular recordings were made from auditory nerve fibres responding to biphasic, charge-balanced current pulses delivered at rates of 20 and 200 pulses/s via a monopolar scala tympani stimulating electrode. The response to 20 pulses/s electrical stimulation of the deafened cochlea exhibited a decrease in spike latency, unaltered temporal jitter and unaltered dynamic range (of nerve firing rate against stimulus current), and a reduction in threshold after 6 months of deafness. The response to a 200-pulse/s stimulus was similar except that the dynamic range was greater than with 20 pulses/s and was also greater in deafened animals than in undeafened animals. Deafness and pulse rate are related; in deaf animals spike recovery appears to be complete between successive stimulus pulses at a low rate (20 pulses/s), but incomplete between pulses at a moderate pulse rate (200 pulses/s). These results suggest that changes in the function of individual auditory nerve fibres after deafness may affect clinical responses during high-rate stimulation such as that used in contemporary speech processing strategies, but not during lower rate stimulation such as that used to record evoked potentials.

Intravesicular pressure monitoring does not cause urinary tract infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intravesicular pressure monitoring using a closed system increases the risk of nosocomial urinary tract infection. DESIGN: Retrospective chart and database review. SETTING: Surgical/trauma intensive care units of a regional level-I trauma center. PATIENTS: 3108 critically ill patients of which 122 patients underwent intravesicular pressure monitoring. INTERVENTIONS: Severity-adjusted urinary tract infection rates were compared among patients with and without intravesicular pressure monitoring. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Over a 24-month period, 122 consecutive patients had 2202 intravesicular pressure measurements performed. During 1448 urinary catheter days, 15 patients who required intravesicular pressure monitoring developed a urinary tract infection with a severity-adjusted device-related infection rate of 7.9 infections per 1000 catheter days. Of the 2986 patients who did not require such monitoring, 98 patients developed a urinary tract infection with an infection rate of 6.5 infections per 1000 catheter days (p=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Intravesicular pressure monitoring using the closed transducer technique is safe and does not increase the risk of urinary tract infection.