Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 188(9-10): e3261-e3264, 2023 08 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36562097

ABSTRACT

Ethylene glycol (EG) toxicity is an important cause of toxic alcohol poisoning in the USA with over 5,000 exposures reported annually. While classically characterized by solitary accidental or intentional ingestions, mass toxic alcohol poisoning outbreaks and more rarely collective consumptions (typically of methanol) have been described. We describe an ethylene glycol poisoning from collective ingestion that involved soldiers presenting at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso, Texas. Eleven soldiers presented to the emergency department over a 12-h period after ingestion of an unknown substance. The first two patients exhibited severe neurologic symptoms, while the remainder were asymptomatic. As serum EG levels were not immediately available, treatment decisions were based on surrogate laboratory values. Two patients received immediate hemodialysis, and fomepizole (FOM) because of severe acidosis with elevated anion and osmolal gaps. These patients developed acute kidney injury with renal recovery within a 3-week period. Two patients with elevated lactate received bicarbonate-based intravenous (IV) fluids and FOM. Two patients received IV fluids only and required prolonged observation for worsening acidosis and/or acute kidney injury. Five patients with normal laboratory values were treated with IV fluids and observation. All patients received cofactors including thiamine and pyridoxine. All patients survived. The outbreak occurred in the setting of limited dialysis resources, limited FOM availability, and in a resource-limited community. Additional guidelines are needed to determine allocation of limited resources, optimal dialysis and FOM treatment course, and comorbid conditions, which may prolong recovery.


Subject(s)
Acidosis , Poisoning , Humans , Ethylene Glycol , Military Facilities , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Fomepizole , Acidosis/chemically induced , Acidosis/epidemiology , Poisoning/complications , Poisoning/therapy
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 160(4): 664-671, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30691350

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To understand measures of frailty among preoperative patients and explain how these can predict perioperative outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional case series with chart review. SETTING: Academic tertiary medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting to an academic hospital following a surgical procedure for a head and neck cancer diagnosis. Charts were queried for preoperative medical diagnoses to calculate 2 frailty scores: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program modified frailty index and the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty index. The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system was also analyzed as a predictor. Primary outcomes were mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. Perioperative complications and discharge disposition were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 410 charts were queried between January 2014 and December 2017. Mortality was 11%; mean ± SD length of stay was 7.4 ± 5.5 days; and the readmission rate was 17%. The modified frailty index score significantly increased the odds of mortality (odds ratio = 1.475, P = .012) and readmission (odds ratio = 1.472, P = .004), the length of stay (relative risk = 1.136, P = .001), and the number of perioperative complications. The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was also significantly associated with poor outcomes, including readmission, length of stay, and perioperative complications. The Adjusted Clinical Groups index was not a significant predictor of outcomes in this study population. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significant increase in poor perioperative outcomes and mortality among patients with head and neck cancer and increased frailty, as measured by the modified frailty index.


Subject(s)
Frailty/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Frailty/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 35(11): 2026-34, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18618106

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to comprehensively evaluate occupational radiation exposure to all intraoperative and perioperative personnel involved in radioguided surgical procedures utilizing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG). METHODS: Radiation exposure to surgeon, anesthetist, scrub technologist, circulating nurse, preoperative nurse, and postoperative nurse, using aluminum oxide dosimeters read by optically stimulated luminescence technology, was evaluated during ten actual radioguided surgical procedures involving administration of (18)F-FDG. RESULTS: Mean patient dosage of (18)F-FDG was 699 +/- 181 MBq (range 451-984). Mean time from (18)F-FDG injection to initial exposure of personnel to the patient was shortest for the preoperative nurse (75 +/- 63 min, range 0-182) followed by the circulating nurse, anesthetist, scrub technologist, surgeon, and postoperative nurse. Mean total time of exposure of the personnel to the patient was longest for the anesthetist (250 +/- 128 min, range 69-492) followed by the circulating nurse, scrub technologist, surgeon, postoperative nurse, and preoperative nurse. Largest deep dose equivalent per case was received by the surgeon (164 +/- 135 microSv, range 10-580) followed by the anesthetist, scrub technologist, postoperative nurse, circulating nurse, and preoperative nurse. Largest deep dose equivalent per hour of exposure was received by the preoperative nurse (83 +/- 134 microSv/h, range 0-400) followed by the surgeon, anesthetist, postoperative nurse, scrub technologist, and circulating nurse. CONCLUSION: On a per case basis, occupational radiation exposure to intraoperative and perioperative personnel involved in (18)F-FDG radioguided surgical procedures is relatively small. Development of guidelines for monitoring occupational radiation exposure in (18)F-FDG cases will provide reassurance and afford a safe work environment for such personnel.


Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Health Personnel , Occupational Exposure , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Perioperative Care , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...