Incidence of viral and fungal complications after utilization of alternative donor sources in hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curable option for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. According to guidelines published by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, allogeneic HCT should be offered to all intermediate- and high-risk patients with acute leukemia. While matched-related donor (MRD) grafts continue to be the preferred stem cell source for allogeneic HCT, studies comparing MRD grafts to matched-unrelated donor (MUD) grafts showed comparable outcomes in patients with acute leukemia. Unfortunately, for those without a suitable matched-related graft, the probability of finding a suitable matched-unrelated donor varies significantly depending on racial and ethnic background. With allogeneic HCT procedures increasing year after year due to the increased availability of suitable donors, each of these alternative donor sources merits special clinical considerations, specifically with regard to infections. Infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic transplant, especially in those receiving alternative donor grafts. Due to the high-risk nature associated with these donor grafts, it is important to understand the true risk of developing infectious complications. While there are a multitude of infections that have been described in patients post-allogeneic HCT, this review seeks to focus on the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and invasive fungal infections (IFI) in adult patients receiving alternative donor source transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

Brincidofovir: understanding its unique profile and potential role against adenovirus and other viral infections.

Brincidofovir (BCV) is a lipid conjugate of cidofovir with good oral bioavailability, enabling optimal intracellular levels of the active drug. Lower rates of nephrotoxicity and myelotoxicity make it a favorable alternative. Despite a greater safety profile among pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, the oral formulation has been associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity in adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Oral BCV continues to be developed as a countermeasure against smallpox, while a potentially safer intravenous preparation has been out licensed to another company. BCV has demonstrated great in vitro potency against double-stranded DNA viruses, especially adenovirus. Because of its importance for immunocompromised patients, this review aims to evaluate BCV's clinical and safety profile to support its continued development.

Optimization of intravenous immune globulin use at a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is a high-cost medication used in a diverse range of settings. At many institutions, IVIG is dosed using total body weight (TBW). Recent evidence suggests that alternative dosing weights reduce waste without compromising clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to quantify the waste reduction potential generated through the use of alternative IVIG dosing weights. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all IVIG doses administered from January 2011 through January 2016 to adults (≥18 years). TBW and height at the time of administration were used to calculate prescribed dose (g/kg), ideal body weight (IBW), and adjusted body weight (AdjBW). Three dosing methods were analyzed, as follows: use of AdjBW if TBW is >120% IBW (method 1), AdjBW for all doses (method 2), and IBW for all doses (method 3). Outcomes included potential IVIG use averted, direct drug cost savings, and reductions in outpatient infusion times for each method. RESULTS: A total of 9,918 doses were administered to 2,564 patients over 5 years, representing an average usage of 75,994 g/year. If dosing methods 1, 2, and 3 had been used, the annual use of IVIG would have decreased by 21.9% (16,658 g/year, p < 0.001), 24.2% (18,371 g/year, p < 0.001), and 35.9% (27,252 g/year, p < 0.001), respectively. This translates into average annual cost differences of $2.37 million, $2.62 million, and $3.89 million and average annual outpatient infusion time savings of 841 hours, 920 hours, and 1,366 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: IVIG dosing optimization through use of alternative dosing weights represents a significant source of waste reduction and cost reduction.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefepime in febrile neutropenia: implications for dose-dependent susceptibility and contemporary dosing regimens.

Alterations in cefepime pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and decreased bacterial susceptibility increase the risk of treatment failure. The impact of susceptible-dose-dependent (SDD) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), i.e. 4-8 µg/mL, on target attainment rates for cefepime in febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. We sought to identify optimal cefepime regimens against SDD cefepime MICs in FN using a modelling and simulation approach. Creatinine clearance (CLCr) and body surface area (BSA) covariate-adjusted models of clearance were evaluated. Monte Carlo simulations representing 10 000 patients were completed to assess various dosing strategies (i.e. 3-8 g/day infused over 0.5-24 h, replaced every 6-24 h) and predict probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) for unbound cefepime. Nine patients received cefepime 2 g every 8 h (q8h) (0.5-h infusion). A two-compartment PK model with BSA- and CLCr-adjusted clearance was fit to the data. Mean population values for total clearance (6.3 ± 1.1 L/h), intercompartmental clearance (6.9 ± 2.8 L/h), and central (14.8 ± 3.8 L) and peripheral (10.9 ± 4.6 L) distribution volumes were all estimated with <50% CV. Simulated dosing regimens of 3-4 g/day administered as continuous infusions and doses of 2 g administered q6h (0-5 h infusion) to q8h (4-h infusion) achieved ≥90% PTA at MICs up to 8 µg/mL. Simulated regimens of 1 g q8h (4-h infusion) or 1 g q6h (0.5-h infusion) achieved ≥90% PTA only against MICs up to 4 µg/mL. High-dose prolonged infusion or more frequent cefepime regimens may be necessary to treat FN organisms with SDD MICs.

Evaluation of Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a major early complication after lung transplantation (LT) and is a risk factor for chronic rejection. Induction immunosuppression has been used as a strategy to reduce early ACR. Recently, our LT program changed our primary induction protocol from basiliximab with standard maintenance immunosuppression to alemtuzumab induction with reduced dose maintenance immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to compare incidence of ACR after this change in the first 6 months after transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort review of patients 18 years or older, which received their first LT between January 2010 and September 2012. RESULTS: The primary outcome was comparison of average lung biopsy scores at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included development of grade A2 or higher rejection, infectious outcomes, overall graft and patient survival. At 6 months, the average biopsy score was significantly lower in the alemtuzumab group than the basiliximab group (0.12 ± 0.29 vs 0.74 ± 0.67; P < 0.0001) (Table 2). Grade 2 or higher rejection was significantly higher in the basiliximab group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Alemtuzumab provided superior outcomes in regard to average biopsy score and lower incidence of grade 2 or higher rejection at 6 months. There were no differences in infectious complications or overall graft or patient survival between the 2 groups.