Effects of low and high dose oestradiol and dydrogesterone therapy on insulin and lipoprotein metabolism in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Menopause diminishes insulin secretion and elimination, increases risk of diabetes and adversely affects lipoprotein metabolism. This study was undertaken to establish whether oral oestradiol plus dydrogesterone postmenopausal hormone therapy can modify these changes. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial of postmenopausal women taking low dose therapy (1 mg/day oestradiol-17 beta with 5 or 10 mg/day dydrogesterone for days 17-28 of each cycle, n = 15) or high dose therapy (2 mg/day oestradiol-17 beta with 10 or 20 mg/day orally administered dydrogesterone, n = 9). MEASUREMENTS: Patients underwent measurement of glucose, insulin and C-peptide in the fasting state and during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) at baseline and after 12 and 24 cycles of treatment. Modelling analysis was used to derive measures of insulin secretion, elimination and sensitivity. Fasting serum lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins were also measured. RESULTS: In both groups there were significant reductions in fasting glucose, insulin and C-peptide. Pancreatic insulin secretion during the IVGTT was increased by treatment (ranging from 45% to 92%, P < 0.01). Insulin elimination was increased at both the peripheral (16% to 43%, P < 0.05) and hepatic (18% to 31%, P < 0.05) levels. Insulin sensitivity was unaffected. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reduced and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal hormone therapy with oestradiol plus dydrogesterone can favourably affect lipoprotein concentrations and can reverse menopause-associated changes in insulin secretion and elimination.

Effect of postmenopausal oestradiol and dydrogesterone therapy on lipoproteins and insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination in hysterectomised women.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate in depth the metabolic effects of oestradiol-17 beta both alone and in combination with the progestagen dydrogesterone. METHODS: Fifteen hysterectomised postmenopausal women were studied before treatment and after 24 weeks taking oestradiol-17 beta alone (2 mg per day), then following a further 6 (oestrogen-alone phase) and 12 (oestrogen plus progestagen phase) weeks with inclusion of dydrogesterone (10 mg per day for days 17-28 of each 28 day cycle). Measurements at each visit included fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination by modelling analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations, body fat distribution by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and arterial function by carotid artery ultrasound. RESULTS: Significant reductions were seen throughout in total and LDL cholesterol. The net reductions in total and LDL cholesterol by the end of the study were 5.8% (P<0.05) and 18.4% (P<0.001), respectively. HDL and HDL subfraction cholesterol concentrations rose during treatment with oestradiol alone, the rise being primarily in the HDL(2) subfraction (+21.6%, P<0.001). Fasting serum triglycerides rose 30% on oestradiol treatment. These increases were unaffected by the addition of dydrogesterone. Insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination, body fat distribution and arterial function were not significantly affected at any stage of the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The small study sample and high variability in measures of glucose and insulin metabolism may have contributed to the absence of the expected significant improvement in these parameters. Orally administered oestradiol had beneficial effects on total, LDL and HDL cholesterol which were unaffected by the addition of dydrogesterone.

Effects of oral and transdermal 17beta-estradiol with cyclical oral norethindrone acetate on insulin sensitivity, secretion, and elimination in postmenopausal women.

Few studies have examined the effects of 17beta-estradiol on parameters of insulin and glucose metabolism. We studied 42 healthy, untreated postmenopausal women seeking relief from menopausal symptoms. They were randomized to receive either oral 17beta-estradiol 2 mg daily combined with sequential oral norethindrone acetate (NETA) 1 mg daily from days 12 to 22, or transdermal 17beta-estradiol 0.05 mg daily combined with sequential oral NETA 1 mg daily from days 17 to 28. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) were performed at baseline and after 46 weeks (estrogen-alone phase) and 48 weeks (combined phase) of completed therapy. Mathematical modeling analysis of plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentration profiles provided measures of insulin resistance, secretion, and elimination. Both types of therapy were associated with a decrease in fasting insulin and glucose levels. Insulin sensitivity was increased by oral estradiol during the estrogen-alone phase but was reversed by the addition of NETA. Transdermal estradiol did not affect insulin sensitivity. Hepatic insulin uptake and insulin secretion were increased with both types of treatment. The oral regimen of estradiol therapy was favorable to both insulin elimination and sensitivity. Transdermal estradiol therapy had relatively few effects on insulin metabolism.

Patient acceptability of and tolerance to a placebo intravaginal ring in hysterectomized women: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerance to and patient acceptability of a placebo intravaginal ring in hysterectomized, postmenopausal women over a 28-day period. DESIGN: Open, single-center. SETTING: University hospital specialist menopause clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 24 healthy postmenopausal women attending menopause clinics at King's College Hospital and the Amarant Centre, London. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discomfort, ring expulsions, bowel, urinary and sexual difficulties associated with the ring and women's overall views on this method. RESULTS: The major problems with use of the intravaginal ring were patient discomfort, involuntary ring expulsion and sexual partner discomfort. These were experienced by 13, 11 and seven women and their partners, respectively, and resulted in premature discontinuation by three women who suffered discomfort and two women who experienced recurrent involuntary ring expulsion. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of the patients found the intravaginal ring acceptable, one-third did not.

Endometrial effects of three doses of trimegestone, a new orally active progestogen, on the postmenopausal endometrium.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of oral trimegestone on endometrial histology and vaginal bleeding when given in combination with oral 17-beta-oestradiol. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel groups, pilot comparative study. Thirty-eight healthy postmenopausal women with normal endometrial histology were given oral 17-beta-oestradiol, 2 mg/day for three continuous cycles of 28 days, plus oral trimegestone, 0.10, 0.25 or 0.50 mg/day from day 15 to day 28 of each cycle. A Vabra biopsy was performed late in the oestradiol/trimegestone phase of cycle 3 and examined for histological evidence of secretory transformation of the endometrium. Characteristics of vaginal bleeding were recorded on a daily basis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven women completed the study, of whom 31 yielded adequate tissue for histological assessment. All showed secretory transformation of the endometrium. Bleeding was of earlier onset and longer duration with the lowest dose of trimegestone. CONCLUSIONS: Trimegestone is a highly effective oral progestogen for endometrial protection, all doses inducing secretory endometrial transformation. Although bleeding patterns suggest a weaker effect of the lowest dose used, the minimum effective dose for endometrial protection has still to be determined and may be lower than those used in this study.

Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of the endometrial effects of a vaginal progesterone gel in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the endometrial effects of two doses of natural progesterone administered by a bioadhesive vaginal gel in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, dose-ranging study of 31 postmenopausal women attending a specialist menopause clinic. Endometrial histologic features, sex steroid hormone concentrations, and vaginal bleeding patterns were assessed during three 28-day cycles of continuous oral conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/day) and two doses of sequential vaginally administered natural progesterone (45 or 90 mg every 48 hours). Histologic results are presented descriptively. Between-group comparisons of other parameters were made with the use of the Mann-Whitney U and Student t tests. RESULTS: Secretory endometrium was found in 35 of 41 histologic samples that yielded adequate tissue for diagnosis. There was one case of proliferative endometrium in the 45 mg progesterone group and none in the 90 mg group and no cases of hyperplasia. Mean plasma progesterone concentrations of 4.6 ng/ml and 6.8 ng/ml were achieved in the 45 and 90 mg groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Very low doses of natural progesterone, when administered vaginally in a bioadhesive gel, cause secretory endometrial transformation in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women.

Intranasal salmon calcitonin for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have studied the effects of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover over a period of 2 years. Our study comprised 117 Caucasian postmenopausal women, otherwise healthy apart from reduced bone density. They received either intranasal synthetic SCT (200 IU either three times weekly or daily) or placebo. Compared with placebo, daily intranasal calcitonin resulted in no significant bone loss in the lumbar spine, as assessed by dual photon absorptiometry, over the 2-year study period (P < 0.02). In this group, women more than 5 years postmenopause, with the lowest baseline bone mass, showed the greatest response to this treatment, with a total increase placebo in lumbar spine BMD of 3.1%. Significant spinal bone loss (P < 0.005) occurred in women receiving either placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin. Although the rates of bone loss in the proximal femur were not significantly different in the three groups, there were differences over time. Whereas bone loss in the daily calcitonin group was insignificant, women who received placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin experienced significant bone loss (P < 0. 001). No significant changes in biochemical markers were observed in any group. Therapy was well tolerated and there were no significant treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that intranasal SCT 200 IU daily is effective and safe for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women with reduced bone mass.

Role of oral pamidronate in preventing bone loss in postmenopausal women.

We have performed a 2-year prospective double-masked study to determine whether the bisphosphonate pamidronate can prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women and its optimal dosage regimen. One hundred and twenty-one such women (mean +/- SD age 57.6 +/- 3.4 years; mean +/- SD time since menopause 7.5 +/- 3.5 years) were randomized to receive either oral pamidronate (300 mg/day) for 4 weeks every 4 months (group A), oral pamidronate (150 mg/day) for 4 weeks every 2 months (group B) or identical placebo capsules (group C). Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur were performed at baseline and at 6-month intervals for 2 years using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD at the lumbar spine (L2-4) increased significantly in groups A and B after 2 years of treatment (mean +/- SD 2.8 +/- 2.1% and 3.0 +/- 2.9% respectively, both p < 0.001) but decreased in the placebo group (-1.6 +/- 3.1%, p < 0.01). Identical results were seen for BMD at the femoral neck, which increased significantly in groups A and B after 2 years of treatment (1.2 +/- 2.3% and 1.3 +/- 2.9% respectively, both p < 0.05) but decreased in the placebo group (-1.9 +/- 3.9%, p < 0.05). There were significant differences over 2 years between the groups at all anatomical sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck and trochanteric region, all p < 0.001; Ward's triangle, p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between groups A and B, suggesting that the two treatment regimens were equally effective in conserving BMD. There were, however, marked differences in tolerability between the two treatment regimens: 13 women (34%) in group A withdrew from the study because of side-effects, but only 5 women (12%) in group B, which was comparable with placebo. These data demonstrate that intermittent oral pamidronate will prevent bone loss from the lumbar spine and proximal femur of postmenopausal women, and that the more frequent but lower dose regimen is well tolerated.

The endometrial nucleolar channel system as an indicator of progestin potency in HRT.

A quantitative assessment has been made of nucleolar channel systems (NCS) in the endometrial glands of postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy. The women were taking conjugated equine oestrogen and one of five progestins. The number of NCS induced was related to the dose of progestin administered. The minimum doses of progestin inducing a comparable response to premenopausal secretory phase endometria were found to be 1-2.5 mg norethindrone, 150 micrograms norgestrel and 20 mg dydrogesterone. Progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate were inadequate at the doses tested. The results show that the quantification of endometrial gland NCS would be a useful addition to the biochemical and morphological assessments made of any new progestin treatment.

Selecting patients for HRT: positive indications.

As our understanding of the nature of modern postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has improved, the number of true contraindications to its use has declined. As a result, the question of whether or not to take HRT has become determined more by patient choice and less by medical factors, a trend that is likely to continue. Thus, women (as well as their doctors) need to be told of the indications for HRT so that they can make an informed choice.

Long-term effects of transdermal and oral hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal bone loss.

Transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is now an accepted form of treatment, but the long-term skeletal effects have not been assessed. Sixty-six early postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either transdermal HRT (continuous 17 beta-oestradiol 0.05 mg/day, with 0.25 mg/day of norethisterone acetate added for 14 days of each 28-day cycle) or oral HRT (continuous conjugated equine oestrogens 0.625 mg/day, with 0.15 mg/day dl-norgestrel added for 12 days of each 28-day cycle). Treatment was given for 3 years and 30 matched untreated women were studied concurrently as a control group. Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual-photon absorptiometry at 6-monthly intervals. Bone turnover was assessed by measurement of biochemical markers. At 3 years bone density had declined by 4% in the lumbar spine and by more than 5% in the femoral neck in the untreated group. By comparison bone density increased in both treatment groups at both sites (p < 0.001 vs. untreated) and biochemical measurements indicated a significant reduction in bone turnover. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Twelve per cent of women on transdermal or oral treatments lost a significant amount of bone from the femoral neck by 3 years despite adequate compliance. Women taking therapy primarily for hip fracture prevention may require a follow-up bone density measurement to establish the efficacy of treatment.

The temporal effect of progestogen on uterine artery pulsatility index in postmenopausal women receiving sequential hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the time relationship between the ingestion of progestogen during sequential hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and impedance to blood flow in the uterine arteries. DESIGN: Nine postmenopausal women who had already received HRT for at least 6 months were treated with either transdermal 17 beta-E2, 0.1 mg/d, or conjugated equine estrogens (Es), 1.25 mg/d, to which norethindrone, 0.7 mg/d, was added for 12 days in a single 28-day cycle of therapy. Transvaginal ultrasonography with color flow imaging was used to measure the pulsatility index (PI) in the uterine arteries every 3 to 5 days over one 28-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: The ingestion of norethindrone increased the mean uterine artery PI by 30% (SE 16.4%). The PI fell significantly within 4 days of ceasing norethindrone. CONCLUSION: Progestogen addition in sequential HRT causes changes in the uterine arterial tone, but the effect subsides within 4 days of progestogen withdrawal.

Long-term effects of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapies on serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations.

OBJECTIVE: To see whether the short-term changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations induced by postmenopausal estrogen-progestin therapy are maintained in the long term. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy postmenopausal women were randomized to either oral therapy (continuous conjugated equine estrogens at 0.625 mg/day with sequential dl-norgestrel at 0.15 mg/day for 12 days each cycle) or transdermal therapy (patches delivering continuous 17 beta-estradiol [E2] at 0.05 mg/day with sequential norethindrone acetate at 0.25 mg/day for 14 days each cycle). Twenty-nine healthy postmenopausal women who did not request therapy served as a reference group. Fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were monitored for 3 years. RESULTS: Studied in the estrogen-progestin phase, oral and transdermal therapies reduced serum total cholesterol concentrations by 12.1% (P < .001) and 8.4% (P < .001), respectively, and those of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) by 14.2% (P < .001) and 6.6% (P < .01), respectively. These changes, apparent at 3 months, were maintained over 3 years. Serum triglyceride concentrations fell by 2.5% (P < .05) and 16.4% (P < .01), respectively. These decreases were evident after 6 months in both groups but were maintained over 3 years only in the transdermal group. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations fell in women given oral therapy (7.8%, P < .05) and transdermal therapy (10.7%, P < .001), as well as in untreated women (7.0%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The potentially beneficial effects of estrogen-progestin therapy on serum total and LDL cholesterol and on triglycerides were maintained over 3 years. Interpretation of the potentially detrimental effects on HDL concentrations was hindered by the changes seen in untreated women.

Paradoxical effects of hormone replacement therapy on breast tenderness in postmenopausal women.

We have studied the effect of HRT on breast tenderness in 61 postmenopausal women randomised to oral or transdermal sequential HRT. An untreated reference group of 29 postmenopausal women was studied concurrently. A questionnaire concerning breast tenderness was administered before and after 10, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment (n = 60) and on 3 occasions at 3-month intervals in the reference group (n = 28). In 10 women with frequent tenderness at baseline, HRT resulted in a reduction at 10 weeks (P < 0.05), which was maintained at 24 weeks (P < 0.05). In contrast, 10 women with infrequent tenderness before treatment reported worsening of tenderness at the 10-week visit (P < 0.01 for transdermal, P < 0.05 for oral), which was not significantly different from the baseline thereafter. These 10 women were older (P < 0.05), and further from the menopause (P < 0.05) than the remaining 40 women who did not develop more frequent tenderness. No significant changes occurred in the reference group. HRT may cause transient breast tenderness, especially in older women and those furthest from the menopause. Paradoxically, it may relieve this symptom in women who have breast tenderness prior to treatment. Breast tenderness should not be considered a contraindication to HRT.

The potential role of serum CA 125 in an ultrasound-based screening program for familial ovarian cancer.

We have assessed the potential role of a test based upon the measurement of serum CA 125 in an ultrasound-based screening program for familial ovarian cancer. A sample of peripheral blood was taken from 1502 self-referred, asymptomatic women whose pedigree showed that at least one close relative had developed the disease. All women in the study underwent one screening by transvaginal ultrasonography (consisting of one or more scans) to detect any persistent lesion and a change in ovarian volume. Women with a positive result were referred for surgery. The concentration of serum CA 125 was measured in all samples at the end of the study. Seven ovarian cancers (4 invasive and 3 of borderline malignancy; 5 FIGO stage Ia, 1 stage IIa, 1 stage III) and 55 benign lesions were detected. We calculated the effect that a prescreening test (based on different threshold values for serum CA 125) would have had on the number of women entering the ultrasound-based screening program, and on the detection rate and false-positive rate of the overall procedure. There was a direct relationship between the number of women referred for ultrasound screening and the detection rate. The use of a threshold value for serum CA 125 > or = 20 U/ml would have meant that 380 women (25.3%) were referred for ultrasonography and 5 out of 7 cancers (71%) would have been detected with a false-positive rate of 1.1%. The odds of a woman with a positive screening result having cancer at surgery would have been about 1:3 (which would improve to about 1:1 if observational indices of color Doppler imaging and a morphological score had been used throughout). We concluded that a prescreening immunochemical test based on the measurement of serum CA 125 (with a threshold value of > or = 20 U/ml) would increase the prior odds for familial ovarian cancer by 2.8, but would lower the overall detection rate by 29% at the prevalence screening.

Hormone replacement therapy and the cardiovascular system. Nonlipid effects.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in women, and the risk of this disease rises markedly after loss of ovarian function. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can reduce the incidence of CHD in postmenopausal women by 50%. HRT causes changes in lipids and lipoproteins, but it is now clear that many other effects of gonadal steroid hormones have important influences on the cardiovascular system. These nonlipid effects include a variety of changes in other metabolic risk factors for CHD, as well as direct arterial effects. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia may be pivotal disturbances in the pathogenesis of CHD. Estradiol reverses the effects of menopause on glucose and insulin metabolism, resulting in an increase in pancreatic insulin secretion and a decrease in insulin resistance, although other types of estrogen may not do this. Androgenic progestogens may oppose this potentially beneficial effect on insulin resistance. Central obesity is linked with many CHD risk factors, and HRT reverses the increased fat distribution that results from loss of ovarian function at the menopause. HRT may also improve the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis, resulting in a reduction in arterial thrombosis. Finally, estradiol acts directly on the arterial wall, modifying both endothelium-dependent and calcium-dependent processes. These actions result in improved blood flow and reduced blood pressure and, importantly, have the potential to reduce myocardial ischaemia.