ABSTRACT
Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability (R) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether R estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean R estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal , Biological Variation, Individual , Cognition , AnimalsABSTRACT
The in vitro radiolabeled methyl incorporation assay, a commonly used technique to evaluate global methylation of DNA, has some disadvantages and limitations. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of global DNA methylation evaluated by radiolabeled methyl incorporation (CPM/microg of DNA) with immunohistochemical staining of the same tissue sections with a monoclonal antibody developed against 5-methylcytosine used (5-mc). We archival specimens of squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the human lung with a matched uninvolved specimen (n = 18 pairs) and 18 lung specimens from subjects without lung cancer (noncancer specimens) to make this comparison. The immunostaining for 5-mc was reported as a percentage of cells positive for staining as well as a weighted average of the intensity score. The results suggested that both radiolabeled methyl incorporation assay and immunostaining for 5-mc can be used to demonstrate hypomethylation of DNA in SCC tissues compared to matched uninvolved tissues. An advantage of immunostaining, however, is its ability to demonstrate hypomethylation of SCC compared to adjacent bronchial mucosa on the same archival specimen, obviating the need to use sections from both SCC and matched uninvolved tissues. Only by using the immunostaining technique were we able to document a statistically significant difference in DNA methylation between SCC and noncancer tissues. We conclude that the immunostaining technique has advantages over the radiolabeled methyl incorporation assay and may be best suited for evaluation of global DNA methylation when the methylation status of cancer cannot be normalized by methyl incorporation of normal tissues or when the number of samples available for evaluation is small.
