ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dermoscopy increases accuracy for melanoma diagnosis by trained primary care physicians. We aimed to establish prevalence of dermatoscope use by general practice registrars, and identify factors associated with dermatoscope use and the implications of dermatoscope use for diagnosis and confidence in diagnosis. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study nested within the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project, an ongoing multi-site cohort study of general practice registrars' consultations. The study was conducted during two six-monthly rounds of ReCEnT data collection in four regional training providers in 2014. RESULTS: Forty-nine per cent of registrars reported having dermoscopy training. Dermoscopy was used in 61% of consultations involving skin or pigmented lesion checks. Dermatoscope use changed provisional diagnosis in 22% of instances and increased diagnostic confidence in 55%. DISCUSSION: Dermoscopy is performed by general practice registrars in a modest proportion of skin and pigmented lesion checks. Its use influences registrars' diagnoses and increases their confidence in their diagnoses.
Subject(s)
Dermoscopy/methods , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Prevalence , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Australia , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermoscopy/education , Dermoscopy/psychology , Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , General Practice/instrumentation , General Practice/methods , Humans , Infant , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Middle Aged , Self EfficacyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Skin conditions are commonly encountered in general practice but dermatology is underrepresented in undergraduate medical courses. Australian and international studies have shown that the dermatological diagnostic ability of general practitioners (GPs) is suboptimal, contributing to increased dermatology outpatient referrals. Dermatological experience in GP vocational training is thus of particular importance. We aimed to document the prevalence of skin disease presentations and the range of skin diseases encountered by GP trainees. We also sought to establish associations of GP trainee's skin disease experience, including their personal characteristics, consultation factors, and the actions arising from the consultation. METHODS: This study took place in the Registrars Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. ReCEnT is an ongoing, prospective, multi-site cohort study of Australian GP trainees' consultations. A descriptive cross-sectional analysis was performed on trainees' consultation data. RESULTS: In total, 645 individual trainees contributed data from 84 615 consultations. Altogether, 11% of all problems managed were skin problems. Infections, dermatitis, injury and wounds were the most common presentations. Associations of consultations for skin problems (compared with all other problems) included seeking in-consultation advice, planning patient follow up and generating learning goals. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest GP trainees find skin problems challenging and may indicate a need for more and better targeted undergraduate and GP trainee education.
