Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(6): e39858, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404417

ABSTRACT

A 63-year-old male with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx status-post laryngectomy and tracheostomy presented for a robotic-assisted right upper lobectomy for neoplasm excision. On physical examination, he was noted to have moderate hypoxia with an SpO2 of 93% on room air. In order to facilitate potential apneic oxygen insufflation and continuous positive airway pressure in the operative lung, a traditional left-sided 35-French double-lumen endobronchial tube was placed through his tracheostomy, and utilized to facilitate lung separation and to improve surgical manipulation. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was extubated to a tracheostomy collar with a 100% fraction of inspired oxygen delivered with 15 liters per minute of flow.

2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(7): 4214-8, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24752264

ABSTRACT

We determined the PCR ribotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 508 toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates collected between 2011 and 2013 from 32 U.S. hospitals. Of the 29 PCR ribotypes identified, the 027 strain type was the most common (28.1%), although the rates varied by geographic region. Ribotype 014/020 isolates appear to be emerging. Clindamycin and moxifloxacin resistances (36.8% and 35.8%, respectively) were the most frequent resistance phenotypes observed. Reduced susceptibility to vancomycin was observed in 39.1% of 027 isolates.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Ribotyping , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Moxifloxacin , United States , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Vancomycin Resistance
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 48(10): 3719-24, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20702676

ABSTRACT

A multicenter clinical trial assessed the performance of the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile assay on stool specimens collected from patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). A total of 2,296 unformed stool specimens, collected from seven study sites, were tested by Xpert C. difficile enrichment culture followed by cell culture cytotoxicity testing of the isolates (i.e., toxigenic culture with enrichment) and the study sites' standard C. difficile test methods. The methods included enzyme immunoassay (EIA), direct cytotoxin testing, and two- and three-step algorithms using glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) screening followed by either EIA or EIA and an in-house PCR assay. All C. difficile strains were typed by PCR-ribotyping. Compared to results for toxigenic culture with enrichment, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Xpert assay were 93.5, 94.0, 73.0, and 98.8%, respectively. The overall sensitivity of the EIAs compared to that of enrichment culture was 60.0%, and the sensitivity of combined GDH algorithms was 72.9%; both were significantly lower than that of Xpert C. difficile (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). The sensitivity of the EIA was significantly lower than that of the Xpert C. difficile assay for detection of ribotypes 002, 027, and 106 (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P = 0.004, respectively, Fisher's exact test), and the sensitivity of GDH algorithms for ribotypes other than 027 was lower than that for Xpert C. difficile (P < 0.001). The Xpert C. difficile assay is a simple, rapid, and accurate method for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in unformed stool specimens and is minimally affected by strain type compared to EIA and GDH-based methods.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Ribotyping/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Toxicity Tests/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...