Survival After Declining Pediatric Tracheostomy Placement.

OBJECTIVE: To determine survival among critically ill children when caregivers decline tracheostomy placement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: All children (<18 years) obtaining a pre-tracheostomy consultation at a tertiary children's hospital between 2016 and 2021 were included. Comorbidities and mortality were compared between children of caregivers that declined or agreed to tracheostomy. RESULTS: Tracheostomy was declined for 58 children but was placed for 203 children. After consultation, mortality was 52% (30/58) when declining and 21% (42/230) when agreeing to tracheostomy (p < 0.001) at a mean of 10.7 months (standard deviation [SD]: 16) and 18.1 months (SD: 17.1), respectively (p = 0.07). For those declining, 31% (18/58) died during the hospitalization within a mean of 1.2 months (SD: 1.4) while 21% (12/58) died at a mean of 23.6 months (SD: 17.5) after discharge. Among children of caregivers declining tracheostomy, older age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.97, p = 0.01) and chronic lung disease (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.82, P = .03) were associated with lower odds of mortality but sepsis (OR: 9.62, 95% CI: 1.161-57.43, p = 0.01) and intubation (OR: 4.98, 95% CI: 1.24-20.08, p = 0.02) were associated with higher odds of mortality. Median survival after declining tracheostomy was 31.9 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0-50.7) and declining placement was associated with increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.04, 95% CI: 2.49-6.55, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When caregivers declined tracheostomy placement, less than half of critically ill children in this cohort survived with younger age, sepsis, and intubation associated with higher mortality. This information offers valuable insight for families weighing decisions pertaining to pediatric tracheostomy placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3602-3607, 2023.

Mortality Among Children with a Tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the cause of death among children with a tracheostomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: All pediatric patients (<18 years) who had a tracheostomy placed at a tertiary care institution between 2015 and 2020 were included. The location and cause of death were recorded along with patient demographics and age. RESULTS: A total of 271 tracheostomies were placed with 46 mortalities reviewed for a mortality rate of 16.8%. Mean age at placement was 1.7 years (SD: 3.4) and mean age at death was 2.9 years (SD: 3.5). Most tracheostomies were placed for respiratory failure (N = 33, 72%). The mean time to death after tracheostomy was 1.2 years (SD: 1.2) and 28% (N = 13) occurred during the same admission as placement. Mean time to death after hospital discharge was 1.3 years (SD: 1.3). Etiology of death was respiratory failure (33%, N = 15), cardiopulmonary arrest (15%, N = 7), unknown (43%, N = 20), or secondary to a tracheostomy-related complication for 9% (N = 4). Location of death was in intensive care units for 41% (N = 19) and 30% died at home (N = 14). Comfort care measures were taken for 37% (N = 17). Severe neurological disability (HR: 4.06, p = 0.003, 95% CI: 1.59-10.34) and congenital heart disease (HR: 2.36, p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.24-4.48) correlated with time to death on Cox proportional hazard modeling. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of children with a tracheostomy who expire will do so during the same admission as tracheostomy placement. Although progression of underlying disease will lead to most deaths, 9% will be a result of a tracheostomy-related complication, which represents a meaningful target for quality improvement initiatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:403-409, 2023.

Accidental Tracheostomy Decannulations in Children-A Prospective Cohort Study of Inpatients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of tracheostomy accidental decannulations (AD) among pediatric inpatients and identify risks for these events. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: All tracheostomy patients (≤18 years) admitted at a tertiary children's hospital between August 2018 and April 2021 were included. AD were recorded and patient harm was classified as no harm/minor, moderate, or severe. Monthly AD incidence was described as events per 1000 tracheostomy-days. RESULTS: One-hundred seventeen AD occurred among 67 children with 33% (22/67) experiencing multiple events (median: 2.5 events, range: 2-10). Mean age at AD was 4.7 years (SD: 4.4). AD resulted from patient movement (32%, 37/117), performing tracheostomy care (27%, 31/117), repositioning or transporting (15%, 17/117), or unclear reasons (27%, 32/117). A parent or guardian was involved in 28% (33/117) of events. Nearly all AD resulted in no more than minor harm (84%, 98/117) but moderate (12%, 14/117) and severe (4%, 5/117) events did occur. There were no deaths. Tracheostomy care or repositioning were frequently responsible in acute versus subacute events (48% vs. 26%, p = 0.04). Mean monthly AD incidence was 4.7 events per 1000 tracheostomy-days (95% CI: 3.7-5.8) and after implementation of safety initiatives, the mean rate decreased from 5.9 events (95% CI: 4.2-7.7) to 3.7 events (95% CI: 2.5-5.0) per 1000 tracheostomy-days (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: AD in children occur at nearly 5 events per 1000 tracheostomy-days and often result in minimal harm. Quality initiatives targeting patient movement, provider education, and tracheostomy care might reduce the frequency of these complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:963-969, 2023.

Caregiver quality of life after pediatric tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a child with a tracheostomy on caregiver quality of life. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional analysis included families with tracheostomy-dependent children between 2019 and 2021. Caregivers were surveyed using the PedsQL™ Family Impact Module with assessments at tracheostomy placement and during ambulatory office visits. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-five surveys were performed with 66 at tracheostomy placement (26%) and 189 at follow-up visits (74%). Compared to families with healthy children, total scores at placement (77.2 vs. 87.6, P < .001) and follow-up visits (78.9 vs. 87.6, P < .001) were significantly lower among pediatric tracheostomy families. Caregivers were likely to report significant improvement in emotional functioning (6.2 points; 95% CI: 0.5-12, P = .03) and worry (9 points, 95% CI: 2.1-15.9, P = .01) over time. Demographic variables demonstrated no confounding or interactive effects. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a tracheostomy is associated with lower caregiver quality of life scores in the short- and long-term compared to caregivers of healthy children. Providers should be sensitive to these challenges and provide appropriate support for families of tracheostomy-dependent children.

Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes After Development of a Multidisciplinary Airway Team: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze a multidisciplinary tracheostomy team's effect on length of stay and cost. METHODS: An airway management program using a balanced scorecard was created to track key performance measures. Interventions included weekly rounding, standardized placement, postoperative care, and caregiver education. Process measures included time to first education, speech-language pathology consultation rates, and pretracheostomy consultations. Outcome measures focused on the total length of stay, 30-day revisit rates after discharge, accidental decannulation rate, and standardized cost. Regression analysis was used to predict the program's effect on length of stay and total cost. RESULTS: In total, 239 children met inclusion. The mean time to first education class was reduced from 13.7 to 1.9 days (P < .001). The speech-language pathology consultation rate increased from 68% to 95% (P < .001), and the presurgical consultation rate with the tracheostomy team increased from 14% to 93% (P < .001). The length of stay decreased from 133 to 96 days (P = .006). Total costs were lower for short admissions but higher for prolonged admissions. Revisits within 30 days remained stable over time (18%). DISCUSSION: Establishing a multidisciplinary tracheostomy team results in improvements in quality metrics when caring for children with tracheostomies. Controlling for associated factors showed the mean length of stay decreased significantly in the first full year of program implementation. Cost analysis estimated significant reductions for tracheostomy patients spending less time in the hospital. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A airway management program can positively affect tracheostomy processes and outcomes.

The Impact of Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if socioeconomic disadvantage impacts perioperative outcomes after tracheostomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case series of children who underwent tracheostomy. Children were divided into less and more disadvantaged groups based on their community's Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated socioeconomic vulnerability measure. Primary outcomes were the length of stay, total cost, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day all-cause readmission after tracheostomy placement. Length of stay was further analyzed using parametric survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients met inclusion criteria, with 153 (64%) residing in more disadvantaged communities. Children from more disadvantaged communities were less likely to be White (42% vs. 26%, P = .009) and more likely to have Medicaid coverage (90% vs. 62%, P < .001). The two groups had similar medical complexity and comorbidities. The main outcome measures showed differences in median total length of stay (113 vs. 79 days, P = .04) and median total cost ($461 000 vs. $279 000, P = .01). Children with tracheostomies who were from more disadvantaged communities also had increased risk of prolonged hospitalizations (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.48-0.83, P = .001). Readmissions, mortality rates, and quality of life scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Community disadvantage was associated with differences in hospitalization length and costs after pediatric tracheostomy placement. Further research should continue to describe how health disparities impact children's safe and efficient care with tracheostomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2603-2609, 2021.

Perioperative Outcomes After Tracheostomy Placement Among Complex Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare perioperative outcomes after pediatric tracheostomy placement based on patient complexity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: All patients that underwent tracheostomy placement at a tertiary children's hospital between 2015 and 2019 were followed. Children with a history of major cardiac surgery, sepsis, or total parental nutrition (TPN) were grouped as complex. Admission length, tracheostomy-related complications, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmissions were recorded among complex and non-complex patients. RESULTS: A total of 238 children were included. Mean age at tracheostomy was 39.9 months (SD: 61.3), 51% were male and 51% were complex. Complex patients were younger at admission (29.9 vs. 46.8 months, P = .03), more likely to have respiratory failure (81% vs. 53%, P < .001) and more often required mechanical ventilation at discharge (86% vs. 67%, P < .001). An additional 33 days after placement was required for complex children (95% CI: 14-51, P = .001) and this group had more deaths (8% vs. 1%, P = .02); however, both groups had similar complication and readmission rates (P > .05). Total charges were higher among complex patients ($700,267 vs. $338,937, P < .001). Parametric survival analysis identified mechanical ventilation and patient complexity interacting to predict post-tracheostomy admission length. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital discharge after pediatric tracheostomy was associated with patient complexity and further influenced by mechanical ventilation. Recognition that cardiac surgery, sepsis, or TPN can predict poorer perioperative outcomes can provide quality improvement strategies for these vulnerable children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2469-E2474, 2021.

Teleneurology Consultations for Prognostication and Brain Death Diagnosis.

The diagnosis of brain death and the determination of neurologic prognosis following cardiac arrest are important reasons for neurology consultation in the intensive care unit. In hospitals without access to neurology consultation, it may be challenging to address these important questions with high reliability in a timely manner. The American Academy of Neurology has established consensus criteria for diagnosis of brain death, which include (i) comatose state; (ii) presence of apnea; and (iii) absence of brainstem reflexes in the setting of a diagnosis of underlying brain injury compatible with brain death. It has recently been shown that virtual assessment of coma using standardized scales is feasible with good inter-rater reliability. The supervision of apnea testing and the neurologic examination of the brainstem by a remote neurologist are possible if conducted in conjunction with a well-trained and experienced bedside team. In this communication, we explore the essential clinical and legal framework that can support using virtual teleconsultations to address this complex topic.