Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: A comparative study of 613 patients.

BACKGROUND: Blood loss is a major concern in the frail elderly patient undergoing hip fracture surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions. The study also investigated the safety profile by comparing rates of thromboembolic events. METHODS: A total of 613 patients with hip fractures were included in the study. Patients received 1g of tranexamic acid on induction of anaesthesia. Postoperative haemoglobin was measured on day one. Blood loss was calculated, and blood transfusion was recorded. RESULTS: Tranexamic acid use resulted in a higher mean postoperative haemoglobin (110.3 ± 15.9 vs 106.8 ± 16.2; p = 0.023) and reduced mean estimated blood loss (571.3 ± 150.4 vs 678.3 ± 201.2; p = 0.001). There was also a significantly reduced number of transfusions in tranexamic acid group (13% vs 28%; p = 0.002). There was no difference in rates of deep vein thrombosis (4 vs 3; p = 0.98) or pulmonary embolism (2 vs 2; p = 1). CONCLUSION: The use of tranexamic acid is effective in reduction of blood loss and rates of blood transfusion, without an apparent increase in adverse thromboembolic events.

Pre-injury use of antiplatelet and anticoagulations therapy are associated with increased mortality in a cohort of 1038 hip fracture patients.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a large burden on the health care systems of developed nations. Patients usually have multiple co-morbidities and the pre-injury use of anticoagulants and anti-platelet medication is common. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a single hospital hip fracture database to facilitate a retrospective analysis of the impact of anti-coagulation and anti-platelet therapy on mortality and complications after surgical management of hip fractures. There were 92 patients on warfarin, 69 on DOAC, 260 antiplatelet patients and 617 control patients. RESULTS: Mortality rates at 30 days were 4.8% for the control group, 12.6% for the antiplatelet group, warfarin 7.0%, 9.5% for Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) group, p = 0.004. Mortality rates at 1 year were 22.4% for the control group, 32.3% for the antiplatelet group, 29.3% for the warfarin group and 29.0% for DOAC group (p=0.007). Amongst complications, significant differences were found in transfusion (DOAC) and wound ooze (warfarin) rates, but the study did not detect significant clinical consequences arising from these differences. A matched analysis for age, sex, and ASA was undertaken to look in more detail at mortality data. Some mortality differences remained between groups with anti-platelet medication associated with increased mortality, but the differences no longer appeared to be significant. Our data suggests that this is a non-causal association, which could be incorporated into predictive mortality risk scores such as the Nottingham hip fracture score. CONCLUSION: We believe that pre-injury antiplatelet therapy is a strong indicator for high risk patients with higher expected mortality after hip fracture surgery. We saw no evidence to support delayed surgery in patients taking DOACs.