Genetic determinants of host- and virus-derived insertions for hepatitis E virus replication.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a long-neglected RNA virus and the major causative agent of acute viral hepatitis in humans. Recent data suggest that HEV has a very heterogeneous hypervariable region (HVR), which can tolerate major genomic rearrangements. In this study, we identify insertions of previously undescribed sequence snippets in serum samples of a ribavirin treatment failure patient. These insertions increase viral replication while not affecting sensitivity towards ribavirin in a subgenomic replicon assay. All insertions contain a predicted nuclear localization sequence and alanine scanning mutagenesis of lysine residues in the HVR influences viral replication. Sequential replacement of lysine residues additionally alters intracellular localization in a fluorescence dye-coupled construct. Furthermore, distinct sequence patterns outside the HVR are identified as viral determinants that recapitulate the enhancing effect. In conclusion, patient-derived insertions can increase HEV replication and synergistically acting viral determinants in and outside the HVR are described. These results will help to understand the underlying principles of viral adaptation by viral- and host-sequence snatching during the clinical course of infection.

Dynamic evolution of the sofosbuvir-associated variant A1343V in HEV-infected patients under concomitant sofosbuvir-ribavirin treatment.

Background & Aims: In the absence of a hepatitis E virus (HEV)-specific antiviral treatment, sofosbuvir has recently been shown to have antiviral activity against HEV in vivo. However, a variant, A1343V, that is strongly associated with viral relapse impedes treatment success. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of variants during sofosbuvir and ribavirin treatment in vivo and assessed the sensitivity of resistance-associated variants to concurrent treatment in cell culture. Methods: Two patients with chronic HEV infection that did not clear infection under ribavirin treatment were subsequently treated with a combination of sofosbuvir and ribavirin. We determined response to treatment by measuring liver enzymes and viral load in blood and stool. Moreover, we analyzed viral evolution using polymerase-targeted high-throughput sequencing and assessed replication fitness of resistance-associated variants using a HEV replicon system. Results: Combination treatment was successful in decreasing viral load towards the limit of quantification. However, during treatment sustained virological response was not achieved. Variants associated with sofosbuvir or ribavirin treatment emerged during treatment, including A1343V and G1634R. Moreover, A1343V, as a single or double mutation with G1634R, was associated with sofosbuvir resistance during concomitant treatment in vitro. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of variant profiling during antiviral treatment of patients with chronic infection. Understanding how intra-host viral evolution impedes treatment success will help guide the design of next-generation antivirals. Impact and implications: The lack of hepatitis E virus (HEV)-specific antivirals to treat chronic infection remains a serious health burden. Although ribavirin, interferon and sofosbuvir have been reported as anti-HEV drugs, not all patients are eligible for treatment or clear infection, since resistant-associated variants can rapidly emerge. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of sofosbuvir and ribavirin combination treatment in terms of HEV suppression, the emergence of resistance-associated variants and their ability to escape treatment inhibition in vitro. Our results provide novel insights into evolutionary dynamics of HEV during treatment and thus will help guide the design of next-generation antivirals.

Mucosal immunization with an adenoviral vector vaccine confers superior protection against RSV compared to natural immunity.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections are the leading cause of severe respiratory illness in early infancy. Although the majority of children and adults mount immune responses against RSV, recurrent infections are frequent throughout life. Humoral and cellular responses contribute to an effective immunity but also their localization at respiratory mucosae is increasingly recognized as an important factor. In the present study, we evaluate a mucosal vaccine based on an adenoviral vector encoding for the RSV fusion protein (Ad-F), and we investigate two genetic adjuvant candidates that encode for Interleukin (IL)-1ß and IFN-ß promoter stimulator I (IPS-1), respectively. While vaccination with Ad-F alone was immunogenic, the inclusion of Ad-IL-1ß increased F-specific mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) and tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM). Consequently, immunization with Ad-F led to some control of virus replication upon RSV infection, but Ad-F+Ad-IL-1ß was the most effective vaccine strategy in limiting viral load and weight loss. Subsequently, we compared the Ad-F+Ad-IL-1ß-induced immunity with that provoked by a primary RSV infection. Systemic F-specific antibody responses were higher in immunized than in previously infected mice. However, the primary infection provoked glycoprotein G-specific antibodies as well eventually leading to similar neutralization titers in both groups. In contrast, mucosal antibody levels were low after infection, whereas mucosal immunization raised robust F-specific responses including IgA. Similarly, vaccination generated F-specific TRM more efficiently compared to a primary RSV infection. Although the primary infection resulted in matrix protein 2 (M2)-specific T cells as well, they did not reach levels of F-specific immunity in the vaccinated group. Moreover, the infection-induced T cell response was less biased towards TRM compared to vaccine-induced immunity. Finally, our vaccine candidate provided superior protection against RSV infection compared to a primary infection as indicated by reduced weight loss, virus replication, and tissue damage. In conclusion, our mucosal vaccine candidate Ad-F+Ad-IL-1ß elicits stronger mucosal immune responses and a more effective protection against RSV infection than natural immunity generated by a previous infection. Harnessing mucosal immune responses by next-generation vaccines is therefore a promising option to establish effective RSV immunity and thereby tackle a major cause of infant hospitalization.