ABSTRACT
Background: Inherited Primary Arrhythmias Syndromes (IPAS), especially Brugada syndrome (BrS), have been associated with arrhythmogenic substrates that can be targeted through ablation. This meta-analysis evaluated the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in different types of IPAS based on procedural guidance and location. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases to identify studies reporting on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events before and after CA in IPAS, including BrS, Long-QT syndrome (LQTS), Early repolarization syndrome (ERS), and Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). The primary outcomes were VA recurrence and VA burden, evaluated through conditional subgroup analysis. Procedural data were collected as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 21 studies involving 584 IPAS patients who underwent CA were included. Following a mean follow-up duration of 33.5 months, substrate-based ablation demonstrated efficacy in reducing VA recurrence across all types of IPAS [RR 0.23; 95% CI (0.13-0.39); p < .001; I 2 = 74%]. However, activation guidance ablation was found to be effective only in IVF cases. Although recurrences still occurred, CA was successful in reducing VA burden [MD -4.70; 95% CI (-6.11-(-3.29); p < .001; I 2 = 74%]. The mean size of arrhythmogenic substrate was 15.70 cm2 [95% CI (12.34-19.99 cm2)], predominantly distributed in the epicardial right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in BrS cases and LQTS [Proportion 0.99; 95% CI (0.96-1.00) and Proportion 0.82; 95% CI ( 0.59-1.00), respectively]. Conclusion: Substrate-based CA has demonstrated effective prevention of VA and reduction in VA burden in IPAS cases.
ABSTRACT
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is essential in hypertensive patients and is frequently associated with organ damage. As of today, hypertension is still the most common comorbidity in COVID-19, but the impact of BPV and the therapeutic target of BPV on outcomes in COVID-19 patients with hypertension remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between BPV and severity of COVID-19, in-hospital mortality, hypertensive status, and efficacy of antihypertensives in suppressing hypertensive covid-19 patient BPV. This cohort retrospective study enrolled 351 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Subjects were classified according to the severity of COVID-19, the presence of hypertension, and their BPV status. During hospitalization, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured at 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., and BPV was calculated as the coefficient of variation of MAP (MAPCV). MAPCV values above the median were defined as high BPV. In addition, we compared the hypertensive status, COVID-19 severity, in-hospital mortality, and antihypertensive agents between the BPV groups. The mean age was 53.85 ± 18.84 years old. Hypertension was significantly associated with high BPV with prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.38 (95% CI = 1.13-1.70; p = 0.003) or severe COVID-19 (PR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.09-1.76; p = 0.005). In laboratory findings, high BPV group had lower Albumin, higher WBC, serum Cr, CRP, and creatinine to albumin ratio. High BPV status also significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.73-3.86; p < 0.001). Patients with a combination of severe COVID-19 status, hypertension, and high BPV status had the highest risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 3.51; 95% CI = 2.32-4.97; p < 0.001) compared to other combination status groups. In COVID-19 patients with hypertension, combination therapy with calcium channel blockers (CCB) as well as CCB monotherapy significantly develop low BPV (PR = 2.002; 95 CI% = 1.33-3.07; p = 0.004) and low mortality (HR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.05-0.56; p = 0.004). Hypertensive status and severe COVID-19 were significantly associated with high BPV, and these factors increased in-hospital mortality. CCBs might be antihypertensive agents that potentially effectively suppressing BPV and mortality in COVID-19 patients.
