Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 117(8): 591-597, 2023 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37024111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that are cost-effective and accurate for predicting severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed. We would like to assess the role of various inflammatory biomarkers on admission as disease severity predictors and determine the optimal cut-off of the neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting severe COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in six hospitals in Bali and recruited real-time PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients aged >18 y from June to August 2020. Data collection included each patient's demographic, clinical, disease severity and hematological data. Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 95 Indonesian COVID-19 patients were included. The highest NLR among severe patients was 11.5±6.2, followed by the non-severe group at 3.3±2.8. The lowest NLR was found in the asymptomatic group (1.9±1.1). The CD4+ and CD8+ values were lowest in the critical and severe disease groups. The area under the curve of NLR was 0.959. Therefore, the optimal NLR cut-off value for predicting severe COVID-19 was ≥3.55, with sensitivity at 90.9% and a specificity of 16.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Lower CD4+ and CD8+ and higher NLR values on admission are reliable predictors of severe COVID-19 among Indonesian people. NLR cut-off ≥3.55 is the optimal value for predicting severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Indonesia/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prognosis , Biomarkers , ROC Curve , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Retrospective Studies
2.
Acta Med Indones ; 53(2): 169-176, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34251345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) caused pneumonia has become a crucial case. MDRO infection has been a problem concern to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A lot of factors play roles in CAP with MDRO infection. This study aimed to analyze MDRO as the etiology of hospitalized patients with CAP along with its risk factors in Dr. Soetomo Hospital as one of the top referral hospitals in east Indonesia. METHODS: this retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2018. Data were collected from patients' medical records. Automatic Rapid Diagnosis (Phoenix TM) was used as a standard method for culture and susceptibility test. Various risk factors were analyzed for MDRO infection. RESULTS: five most common pathogens in hospitalized patients with CAP were Acinetobacter baumannii 244/1364 (17.9%), Klebsiella pneumoniae 134/1364 (9.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 91/1364 (6.7%), Escherichia coli 58/1364 (4.3%), and Enterobacter cloacae 45/1364 (3.3%). There were 294/1364 (21.5%) MDROs isolated from patients with CAP. MDRO infection was linked to previous hospitalization, malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and structural lung disease with p values of 0.002, <0.001, 0.024, and <0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: the incidence of MDRO in CAP is high (21.5%). The risk factors related were previous hospitalization, malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and structural lung disease.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteria/classification , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Indonesia/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 102: 152-154, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33115680

ABSTRACT

Similar symptoms and laboratory findings between dengue and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pose a diagnostic challenge in some dengue-endemic countries in Asia. In this study, we reported three cases of suspected COVID-19-dengue coinfection in hospitals of Bali, Indonesia. Serological data demonstrated that patients with positive results for dengue virus (DENV) NS1 antigen and anti-dengue IgM were also reactive to COVID-19 rapid antibody tests, suggesting dengue-COVID-19 coinfection. However, two patients were later confirmed negative for SARS-COV-2 by qRT-PCR, implying a plausible cross-reactivity of anti-dengue and anti-COVID-19 antibodies in the serological test. Coinfection of dengue and COVID-19 was evident in one patient, following confirmation of SARS-COV-2 by qRT-PCR and DENV infection using the NS1 antigen serology test. This case was the first case of dengue and COVID-19 coinfection in Indonesia and revealed possible cross-reactivity between SARS-COV-2 and DENV antibodies based on rapid serological tests. Our study indicates a public health concern regarding COVID-19 and dengue detection in Indonesia as well as in other dengue-endemic countries, and it is important for these nations to manage both pathogens concurrently.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Coinfection/diagnosis , Dengue Virus/immunology , Dengue/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/immunology , Coinfection/immunology , Cross Reactions , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...