Comparison of Two Different Fibrinogen Concentrates in an in vitro Model of Dilutional Coagulopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Fibrinogen concentrates are widely used to restore clot stability in situations of bleeding. Fibrinogen preparations are produced using different production methods, resulting in different compounds. Thus, different preparations might have a distinct impact on blood coagulation. We tested the effect of fibrinogen concentrates Haemocomplettan® (CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) and fibryga® (Octapharma GmbH, Langenfeld, Germany) on the impairments induced by 60% dilutional coagulopathy in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The influence of the fibrinogen concentrates fibryga® and Haemocomplettan® on colloid (gelatine, hydroxyethyl starch [HES], albumin)-induced or crystalloid (Ringer's acetate)-induced dilutional coagulopathy was analysed using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and standard laboratory tests. The following experimental conditions were analysed in vitro: whole blood, 60% dilution (40% blood and 60% diluent) ± 50 or 100 mg/kg-1 fibryga® or Haemocomplettan®, respectively. RESULTS: Dilution with either diluent resulted in prolonged clotting time (CT) in an extrinsic activated test (CTEXTEM) and decreased maximum clot firmness (MCFFIBTEM) as expressed, e.g., by gelatine: (59.5 s [62/54.8] vs. 95 s [102.8/86.8]; p < 0.001 and 14 mm [16/10.5] vs. 3 mm [4-3]; p < 0.001). Substitution after 60% dilution with HES resulted in no difference between the preparations, except for shorter thrombin time with fibryga® (14 s [15/14] vs. 18 s [18.8/17]; p = 0.0093; low dose). CTEXTEM was higher with Haemocomplettan® in a gelatine-induced dilution (51 s [54.5/47.5] vs. 63 s [71/60.3]; p = 0.0202; low dose) whereas thrombin time was lower with fibryga® (19.5 s [20.8/19] vs. 27 s [29/25.3]; p = 0.0017). In dilution with albumin, differences in CTEXTEM (69 s [76.5/66] vs. 56 s [57/53.3]; p = 0.0114; low dose) and thrombin time (18 s [18/17] vs. 24.5 s [25.8/24]; p = 0.0202; low dose) were seen. In dilution with crystalloid solution, again differences in CTEXTEM (53.5 s [57.8/53] vs. 45 s [47/43]; p = 0.035; low dose) and thrombin time (17 s [17/16] vs. 23.5 s [24/23]; p = 0.0014; low dose) were seen. Fibrinogen levels were more increased by high-dose substitution of both preparations. CONCLUSION: Based on this data it can be stated that both fibryga® and Haemocomplettan® had the same performance in our in vitro model except for CTEXTEM and thrombin time.

Real-time detection and differentiation of direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and dabigatran) using modified thromboelastometric reagents.

INTRODUCTION: Timely measurement of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is challenging, though clinically important. We tested the hypotheses, that thromboelastometry is able to detect dabigatran and rivaroxaban and discriminates between dabigatran and rivaroxaban as representatives of the two groups of DOACs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a prospective-observational study: In-vitro dose-effect-curves for rivaroxaban and dabigatran were performed (n = 10). Ex-vivo: Patients with indication of DOAC treatment (stroke; dabigatran/rivaroxaban) were included (n = 21). Blood samples were analyzed before first intake, at first estimated peak level and at 24 h after first but before following intake and 3 h after 24 h-intake. Standard and modified thromboelastometric-assays, using low tissue factor concentrations (TFTEM) or ecarin (ECATEM) were used. Receiver-operating-characteristics-curve-analysis (ROC), regression-analysis and two-way-ANOVA were performed. RESULTS: In-vitro: TFTEM detected dabigatran and rivaroxaban (ROC_AUC: 0.99; sensitivity/specificity: 100%/98%) but could not discriminate. Dabigatran prolongs CTECATEM whereas rivaroxaban did not. Clotting Time (CT)-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM discriminated highly sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban even at very low concentrations (ROC_AUC:1.0). CTECATEM correlated with dabigatran spiked concentrations (r = 0.9985; p < 0.001) and CTTFTEM (r = 0.9363; p = 0.006) with rivaroxaban. Similarly results could be demonstrated with patient data: We confirmed the performance for the differentiation of CT-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM (sensitivity 100%/specificity 100%) at any time after first intake of either DOAC. CONCLUSION: The thromboelastometric tests TFTEM and ECATEM detect and differentiate rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Further investigations evaluate the other DOACs and the differentiation to phenprocoumon. However, results need to be confirmed in a larger study, and especially cut off values for differentiation need to be calculated from a larger sample size.