Differential lung ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography in ultrasound-guided anterior suprascapular nerve block vs. interscalene brachial plexus block: A patient and assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is used to control pain after shoulder surgery. Though effective, drawbacks include phrenic nerve block and motor block of the hand. The ultrasound-guided anterior approach to perform suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) may provide a good alternative. OBJECTIVE: To compare lung ventilation and diaphragmatic activity on the operated side in ISB and SSNB. DESIGN: Randomised, controlled patient-blinded and assessor-blinded trial. SETTING: Outpatient surgical clinic with recruitment from June 2017 to January 2018. PATIENTS: Fifty-five outpatients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were allocated randomly to receive SSNB or ISB. Technical problems with monitoring devices unrelated to the intervention led to exclusion of seven patients. The remaining 48 (n=24 in each group) were followed up for 24 h without drop-outs. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 10 ml of ropivacaine 1.0% wt/vol for both procedures. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage lung ventilation on the operated side was the primary endpoint as assessed with electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Secondary endpoints were hemidiaphragmatic motion on the operated side, pain, opioid use, hand strength and numbness, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Before regional anaesthesia, the lung on the operated side contributed a median [IQR] of 50 [42 to 56]% of the total lung ventilation. Postoperatively, it was 40 [3 to 50]% (SSNB) vs. 3 [1 to 13]% (ISB) for an adjusted difference of 23 (95% CI, 13 to 34)%, (P < 0.001). Hemidiaphragmatic motion was 1.90 (95% CI, 1.37 to 2.44 cm), (P < 0.001) lower in the ISB group compared with the SSNB group. Hand strength was 11.2 (95% CI 3.6 to 18.9), (P = 0.0024) kg greater for SSNB and numbness was observed in 0% (SSNB) vs. 46% (ISB) of patients, P < 0.001. Pain was low in the first 6 h after surgery in both groups with slightly, but not significantly, lower values for ISB. No meaningful or significant differences were found for opioid use or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: An ultrasound-guided anterior approach to SSNB preserves ipsilateral lung ventilation and phrenic function better than a standard ISB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: drks.de identifier: DRKS00011787.

Anterior Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Surgery in the Outpatient Setting: A Randomized Controlled Patient- and Assessor-Blinded Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), a potent option to control pain after shoulder surgery, has notable adverse effects. The anterior suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) might provide comparable analgesia and cause less grip-strength impairment. These characteristics were studied in this randomized controlled patient- and assessor-blinded trial. METHODS: Outpatients were randomized to single-shot ultrasound-guided SSNB (10 mL ropivacaine 1%) or ISB (20 mL ropivacaine 0.75%) before general anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Pain (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10), grip strength, degree of satisfaction, and strength of recommendation were assessed. RESULTS: We randomized 168 patients to each group and analyzed 164 in the SSNB group and 165 in the ISB group. Nerve blocks were successful in 98% of the patients from each group. Both procedures provided good postoperative analgesia, and the mean pain level for SSNB was slightly but significantly lower by 0.32 units (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.46; P < 0.001) and noninferior given a margin of 1.1 units; P < 0.001. Within the first 24 hours, 162 (99%) of SSNB patients had unimpaired grip strength compared to 81 (49%) of ISB patients (P < 0.001). The multiple primary outcome, superior unimpaired grip strength, and noninferior pain control was significant; P < 0.001. Compared to ISB patients (n = 130 [79%]), significantly more SSNB patients (n = 150 [91%]) were satisfied/highly satisfied. Patients in the SSNB group were more likely to recommend the procedure highly. CONCLUSIONS: For outpatients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia, the SSNB seems preferable to ISB. It provides excellent postoperative analgesia without exposing patients to impaired mobility and to risks of the more potent but also more invasive ISB.

Intracorporeal knotting of a femoral nerve catheter.

Peripheral nerve catheters are effective and well-established tools to provide postoperative analgesia to patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The performance of these techniques is usually considered safe. However, placement of nerve catheters may be associated with a considerable number of side effects and major complications have repeatedly been published. In this work, we report on a patient who underwent total knee replacement with spinal anesthesia and preoperative insertion of femoral and sciatic nerve catheters for postoperative analgesia. During insertion of the femoral catheter, significant resistance was encountered upon retracting the catheter. This occurred due to knotting of the catheter. The catheter had to be removed by operative intervention which has to be considered a major complication. The postoperative course was uneventful. The principles for removal of entrapped peripheral catheters are not well established, may differ from those for neuroaxial catheters, and range from cautious manipulation up to surgical intervention.

Effects of Music Listening on Cortisol Levels and Propofol Consumption during Spinal Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: This study explores effects of instrumental music on the hormonal system (as indicated by serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone), the immune system (as indicated by immunoglobulin A) and sedative drug requirements during surgery (elective total hip joint replacement under spinal anesthesia with light sedation). This is the first study investigating this issue with a double-blind design using instrumental music. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Patients (n = 40) were randomly assigned either to a music group (listening to instrumental music), or to a control group (listening to a non-musical placebo stimulus). Both groups listened to the auditory stimulus about 2 h before, and during the entire intra-operative period (during the intra-operative light sedation, subjects were able to respond lethargically to verbal commands). Results indicate that, during surgery, patients of the music group had a lower propofol consumption, and lower cortisol levels, compared to the control group. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data show that listening to music during surgery under regional anesthesia has effects on cortisol levels (reflecting stress-reducing effects) and reduces sedative requirements to reach light sedation.

Does brain temperature correlate with intracranial pressure?

OBJECTIVE: A positive correlation between brain temperature and intracranial pressure (ICP) has been proposed for patients under intensive care conditions. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were recorded at 5-minute intervals in patients under ICP monitoring conditions. Brain temperature: combined ICP/temperature probe (Raumedic), core temperature: indwelling urinary catheter with temperature probe (Rüsch). The correlation between brain temperature and ICP was assessed by computing an estimated mean correlation coefficient (re) and by a time series analysis. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive neurosurgical patients receiving intensive care therapy for trauma, cerebrovascular malformation, and spontaneous hemorrhage were studied. A total of 48,892 measurements (9778 h) were analyzed. No additional interventions were performed. RESULTS: The median ICP was 14 mm Hg (range: -13 to 167). The brain temperature (median 38 degrees C; range 23.2 to 42.1) was 0.3 degrees C (range: -3.6 to 2.6) higher than the core temperature (median 37.7 degrees C; range 16.6 to 42.0), P<0.001. The mean Pearson correlation between ICP and brain temperature in all patients was re=0.13 (P<0.05); the time series analysis (assuming a possible lagged correlation between ICP and brain temperature) revealed a mean correlation of 0.05+/-0.25 (P<0.05). Both correlation coefficients indicate that any relationship between brain temperature and ICP accounts for less than 2% of the variability [coefficient of determination (r)<0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the notion of a clinically useful correlation between brain temperature and ICP.

Complications and adverse effects associated with continuous peripheral nerve blocks in orthopedic patients.

BACKGROUND: The increasing popularity of continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) warrants further study of their adverse effects and complications. METHODS: Anterior sciatic, femoral, and interscalene brachial plexus CPNBs were performed preoperatively using standardized catheter techniques in orthopedic patients prior to general or spinal anesthesia. Complications and adverse effects related to CPNBs were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: We analyzed 1398 CPNBs in 849 consecutive patients (mean age 65 +/- 13 yr) between 2002 and 2004. Two-hundred-twenty-one patients received interscalene, 628 patients femoral, and 549 sciatic CPNBs, respectively. In all the latter patients, we performed both femoral and sciatic CPNBs. Overall, there were 9 cases of local inflammation at the insertion site (0.6%), and 3 local infections (pustule) (0.2%, all femoral CPNBs). In one patient undergoing a femoral technique, a retroperitoneal hematoma led to compression injury of the femoral nerve. Complete denervation of the quadriceps femoris muscle was confirmed by electroneuromyography. No other major neurological complications were noted. There was one case of methemoglobinemia associated with an interscalene CPNB. Vascular puncture occurred in approximately 6% of patients undergoing femoral and sciatic CPNBs. Catheter rupture was noted in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results add to the evidence that major complications from CPNBs are rare. However, minor adverse effects associated with CPNBs may be more common.

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone: randomised double blind multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg metoclopramide combined with 8 mg dexamethasone, given intraoperatively, is more effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting than 8 mg dexamethasone alone, and to assess benefit in relation to adverse drug reactions. DESIGN: Four-armed, parallel group, double blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Four clinics of a university hospital and four district hospitals in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 3140 patients who received balanced or regional anaesthesia during surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours of surgery (primary end point); occurrence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals) of postoperative nausea and vomiting were 23.1% (20.2% to 26.0%), 20.6% (17.8% to 23.4%), 17.2% (14.6% to 19.8%), and 14.5% (12.0% to 17.0%) for 0 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg metoclopramide. In the secondary analysis, 25 mg and 50 mg metoclopramide were equally effective at preventing early nausea (0-12 hours), but only 50 mg reduced late nausea and vomiting (> 12 hours). The most frequent adverse drug reactions were hypotension and tachycardia, with cumulative incidences of 8.8% (6.8% to 10.8%), 11.2% (9.0% to 13.4%), 12.9% (10.5% to 15.3%), and 17.9% (15.2% to 20.6%) for 0 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg metoclopramide. CONCLUSION: The addition of 50 mg metoclopramide to 8 mg dexamethasone (given intraoperatively) is an effective, safe, and cheap way to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. A reduced dose of 25 mg metoclopramide intraoperatively, with additional postoperative prophylaxis in high risk patients, may be equally effective and cause fewer adverse drug reactions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31625370 [controlled-trials.com].