ABSTRACT
Lipid conjugates have advanced the field of lipid-based nanomedicine by promoting active-targeting (ligand, peptide, antibody), stability (PEGylation), controlled release (lipoid prodrug), and probe-based tracking (fluorophore). Recent findings indicate lipid conjugates dissociating from nanomedicine upon encountering a biological environment. Yet, implications for (pre)clinical outcomes remain unclear. In this study, using the zebrafish model (Danio rerio), we investigated the fate of liposome-incorporated lipid fluorophore conjugates (LFCs) after intravenous (IV) administration. LFCs having a bilayer mismatch and relatively polar fluorophore revealed counter-predictive outcomes for Caelyx/Doxil (clearance vs. circulating) and AmBisome-like liposomes (scavenger endothelial cell vs. macrophage uptake). Findings on LFC (mis)match for Caelyx/Doxil-like liposomes were supported by translational intravital imaging studies in mice. Importantly, contradicting observations suggest to originate from LFC dissociation in vivo, which was investigated by Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (AF4) upon liposome-serum incubation in situ. Our data suggests that LFCs matching with the liposome bilayer composition - that did not dissociate upon serum incubation - revealed improved predictive outcomes for liposome biodistribution profiles. Altogether, this study highlights the critical importance of fatty acid tail length and headgroup moiety when selecting lipid conjugates for lipid-based nanomedicine.
