Medical School Clinical Trials Educational Intervention: Impact on Knowledge and Attitudes.

Medical student knowledge and opinions of clinical research have important ramifications for how likely they will be to refer patients into clinical trials as practicing physicians. This study examined students understanding, knowledge, and attitudes about clinical trials at the start of medical school and after completion of a multi-faceted intervention designed to increase medical students' confidence in understanding and explaining clinical trials during the pre-clinical and clinical years. Medical students were surveyed about their knowledge of and attitudes toward clinical trials in their first (N = 724) and third (N = 191) years of medical school. During the intervening years, students attend a lecture delivered by University of Hawai 'i Cancer Center faculty, were provided a resource manual from National Cancer Institute, participated in two problem-based learning clinical scenarios, and completed an optional practicum. After completing the comprehensive clinical trials education, there were significant increases in student understanding and knowledge and a decrease in student perception that clinical trials exploit participants. Most students agreed or strongly agreed that inclusion of clinical trials in the curriculum was important and would influence their future practice. Integration of clinical trials education into the medical school curriculum improved students' understanding of clinical research, their ability to communicate the clinical trials process, and confidence in conducting, referring to, and locating clinical trials. Medical students appreciate the importance of clinical trials in advancing medicine and medical education. Further integration of clinical trials education and opportunities to engage in research during medical school are warranted to address students' uncertainty about the benefits of participation for patients.

In Their Own Words, "Waiting Sucks:" A Qualitative Study of Medical Testing-Related Anxiety in Patients with Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study sought to learn from patients with cancer -- in their own words -- about anxiety associated with medical testing. METHODS: Patients with cancer or a history of cancer were recruited from an oncology clinic. After oral consent, each was interviewed in person. A semi-structured interview guide was used to help focus the interviews. Interviews were then recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with rigorous qualitative methods. RESULTS: Twenty patients are the focus of this report, which highlights 2 main themes from the data. The first is that anxiety related to medical testing is a real entity. Although not all patients experienced it, those who did described it as such ("I was a little apprehensive." "It's the anticipation." "I don't think it bothers me until I get near the time for testing."). The second theme focused on coping. Patients offered insight on how to cope ("So I just deal with it and work." "And don't let myself sink into a pity pot …." "See your scan as a tool instead of … instead of um … a death sentence, I suppose."). CONCLUSION: In patients with cancer, the anxiety from medical testing is real, could perhaps be mitigated by sharing coping methods from patient to patient, and merits further study.

Patient Understanding of Oncologic Radiology Reports: Is Access to Electronic Medical Records Helpful?

Access to electronic medical record (EMR) patient portals made it easier for patients to quickly acquire the results of their radiology studies. However, there is little research on how well oncology patients understand the findings of radiology reports presented in the online portal without patient-physician discussion. This study assessed oncology patients' confidence and accuracy in interpreting radiology reports either with or without layman translations. A survey based on a radiology report was administered to oncology patients and caregivers. Two versions of the radiological report were randomly distributed, either a standard report or one with layman translations to evaluate participant understanding and accuracy of interpreting radiological results. Among 85 participants, a majority (67.8%) reported wanting patient portal access to radiological reports, yet less than a quarter (21.2%) felt confident in reading and interpreting radiological reports. Univariate binary logistic regression models showed that participants who read the lay report were 8 times more likely to find the radiology report easy to read. This research demonstrated that the inclusion of layman translation of standard radiology reports improves oncology patients' and caregivers' understanding of such reports with statistically significant and clinically meaningful increases in readability.

Healthcare Providers' Experiences with Hiccups in Patients with Cancer: Report of a United States National Survey.

Hiccups occur in 15-40% of cancer patients, but previous research has not sought the perspectives of cancer healthcare providers. The objective of this research is to report on United States cancer healthcare providers' awareness of their patients' hiccups and these healthcare providers' perceived need for further palliation options. A survey was developed and then distributed throughout the United States via email to cancer healthcare providers; results are reported descriptively. Six hundred eighty-four cancer healthcare providers completed 2 eligibility screening questions which required them to have cared for an adequate number of patients (> 10 in the past 6 months) with "clinically significant" hiccups (defined as hiccups that persisted for >48 hours or occurred from cancer or from cancer care). Of 113 eligible healthcare providers, 90 completed the survey. Healthcare providers described hiccups as associated with stress/anxiety, fatigue, sleep problems, and decreased work/school productivity. In 49% of patients, healthcare providers initially prescribed medications (commonly chlorpromazine or baclofen); 18% expressed dissatisfaction with current palliation. Proffered comments included, "When current therapies do not work, it can be very demoralizing to our patients; " and "…my biggest complaint is that current treatments also come with their own side effects which can be quite severe." Discordance appears to exist between the percentage of cancer patients with hiccups and the percentage of cancer healthcare providers with awareness of their patients' hiccups. Nonetheless, healthcare providers described notable hiccup-associated symptoms in their patients and a need for more palliative options.

Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study.

Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (P = .68). Forty-one of 47 (87%) rural patients signed a short consent form; in contrast, 30 of 42 (71%) signed a long form. These trends suggest rural patients are more likely to sign short consent forms. Further study is indicated.

Understanding "Patient refuses" among 90+ year old patients with cancer or presumed cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Patients who are 90+ years of age are a growing - but understudied - group at risk for cancer. Because many of these patients are undertreated (with no tissue/cytologic diagnosis), we sought to better understand how such decisions are arrived upon. METHODS: This study focused on patients between 2007 and 2017. None had received cancer therapy. Medical records were reviewed for quotations relevant to decision-making and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (median age 93 years) with a cancer diagnosis/presumed diagnosis were identified; most were women (82%) with an average of six co-morbidities (dementia occurred in approximately one-third). The primary qualitative theme was a keen appreciation on the part of all stakeholders of the gravity of the decision to forgo a cancer work-up/therapy, with four subthemes: 1) substantial, detailed medical information about the patient's medical condition ("600 mL of yellow, hazy fluid with an LDH [lactate dehydrogenase] level greater than 450 …"); 2) complex discussions about the risks and benefits of no biopsy and/or no cancer treatment ("[the patient] would not prefer to have the quality of any remaining time ruined with salvage chemo and radiation"); 3) the inclusion of multiple individuals in decision-making ("I had a lengthy discussion with the patient and her daughter;" "I spoke by phone with one of my pathology colleagues"); and 4) patient-voiced decision-making ("I want to die."). CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers appear to understand the seriousness of no cancer-directed therapy and no work-up in patients 90 years of age and older. Neither ageism nor nihilism was observed.

Survivor and Caregiver Expectations and Preferences Regarding Lung Cancer Treatment.

PURPOSE: Treatment success in lung cancer is no longer restricted to objective measures of disease-specific outcomes and overall survival alone but now incorporates treatment morbidity and subjective quality of life (QoL). This study reports how lung cancer patients, survivors, and caregivers define treatment success and prioritize treatment decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey with both ranking and free-response questions was administered among lung cancer survivors and caregivers. Responses were used to evaluate treatment priorities, perceptions of treatment success based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, and troublesomeness of treatment-related toxicities. RESULTS: Among 61 respondents (29 lung cancer survivors, 28 caregivers of survivors, and 4 who were both survivors and caregivers), cancer cure was the highest priority when making treatment decisions for 74.5% of respondents, with QoL during and after treatment ranking second and third. Seventy percent of respondents felt that treatment morbidity resulting in complete dependence on others and spending the entire day confined to bed or chair would represent unsuccessful treatment. Requiring oxygen use was ranked as a very or extremely troublesome treatment toxicity by 64%, followed by shortness of breath (62%), fatigue (49%), chronic cough (34%), and appetite loss (30%). Even with remission, a 3- to 7-day hospital admission for pneumonia during treatment was deemed an unsuccessful outcome by 30%. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of physicians discussing in detail with their lung cancer patients their desires and goals. Accounting for factors like expected performance status following treatment, troublesomeness of treatment toxicities, and hospitalization rates may help guide treatment decisions.