Implant Insertion Procedure of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab: Overview and Clinical Pearls.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab implant insertion procedure. METHODS: A surgical procedure based on the clinical trial program in patients with retinal diseases. RESULTS: An infusion line is placed in the infero-temporal quadrant; a superotemporal quadrant corneal traction suture is recommended. The superotemporal quadrant peritomy of 6 × 6 mm is executed with gentle, purposeful tissue handling. Generous posterior and lateral sub-Tenon's capsule dissection creates laxity for the subsequent closure. Adequate scleral hemostasis is achieved with wet-field cautery to maintain a clean field. The implant is filled under magnification with a customized formulation of ranibizumab. A precise 3.5-mm-long scleral incision (4 mm posterior and parallel to the limbus) is created to ensure proper implant fit. The exposed pars plana undergoes laser ablation to reduce vitreous hemorrhage risk. A pars plana incision is made, and the implant is inserted perpendicular to the globe and seated flush against the sclera. Complete closure of both the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule with scleral anchoring and mild tissue overhang at the anterior limbus is performed to reduce conjunctival erosion and retraction risks. CONCLUSION: The procedure is straightforward yet requires precise preoperative and intraoperative preparation and standardized surgical techniques. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:249-256.].

Management of Key Ocular Adverse Events in Patients Implanted with the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab.

PURPOSE: To provide strategies for the management of key ocular adverse events (AEs) that may be encountered with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) in practice and provide recommendations that may mitigate such AEs based on clinical trial experiences and considerations from experts in the field. DESIGN: Safety evaluation based on the phase 2 Ladder (NCT02510794) and phase 3 Archway (NCT03677934) trials of the PDS. METHODS: The PDS implant is a permanent, indwelling, and refillable ocular drug delivery system that requires standardized procedural steps for its insertion and refill-exchange procedures, which evolved during the PDS clinical program. We described identified AEs that may arise after implant insertion or refill-exchange procedures, including conjunctival retraction, conjunctival erosion, endophthalmitis, implant dislocation, conjunctival blebs or conjunctival filtering bleb leaks, wound leaks, hypotony, choroidal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, cataract, and septum dislodgement. RESULTS: Adverse events related to the PDS were well understood, were manageable by trial investigators, and did not prevent patients from achieving optimal outcomes in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons using the PDS should be aware of potential ocular AEs and identify them early for optimal management. As with any new surgical procedure, it is important to provide surgeons with appropriate training, ensure adherence to optimal surgical techniques, and continually refine the procedure to mitigate complications and improve outcomes.

The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab: a new paradigm for long-acting retinal drug delivery.

The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is an innovative intraocular drug delivery system designed for the continuous delivery of ranibizumab into the vitreous for 6 months and beyond. The PDS includes an ocular implant, a customized formulation of ranibizumab, and four dedicated ancillary devices for initial fill, surgical implantation, refill-exchange, and explantation, if clinically indicated. Ranibizumab is an ideal candidate for the PDS on account of its unique physicochemical stability and high solubility. Controlled release is achieved via passive diffusion through the porous release control element, which is tuned to specific drug characteristics to accomplish a therapeutic level of ranibizumab in the vitreous. To characterize drug release from the implant, release rate was measured in vitro with starting concentrations of ranibizumab 10, 40, and 100 mg/mL, with release of ranibizumab 40 and 100 mg/mL found to remain quantifiable after 6 months. Using a starting concentration of 100 mg/mL, active release rate at approximately 6 months was consistent after the initial fill and first, second, and third refills, demonstrating reproducibility between implants and between multiple refill-exchanges of the same implant. A refill-exchange performed with a single 100-µL stroke using the refill needle was shown to replace over 95% of the implant contents with fresh drug. In vitro data support the use of the PDS with fixed refill-exchange intervals of at least 6 months in clinical trials.

Prophylactic Ranibizumab to Prevent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Vulnerable Fellow Eyes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether prophylactic ranibizumab prevents the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in eyes with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) for patients with preexisting nAMD in their contralateral eye. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 50 years and older with intermediate AMD (multiple intermediate drusen [≥63 µm and <125 µm] or ≥1 large drusen [≥125 µm] and pigmentary changes) in the study eye and nAMD in the contralateral eye. INTERVENTION: Intravitreal ranibizumab injection (0.5 mg) or sham injection every 3 months for 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conversion to nAMD over 24 months (primary). Change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 24 months (secondary). RESULTS: Among 108 enrolled participants (54 [50%] in each group), all except 2 were non-Hispanic Whites, 61 participants (56%) were female, and the mean age was 78 years. The mean baseline visual acuity was 77.7 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/32). Conversion to nAMD over 24 months occurred among 7 of 54 eyes (13%) in both groups (ranibizumab vs. sham hazard ratio = 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-2.59]; P = 0.86). At 24 months, the cumulative incidence of nAMD adjusted for loss to follow-up was 14% (95% CI, 4%-23%) in the ranibizumab group and 15% (95% CI, 4%-25%) in the sham group. At 24 months, the mean change in visual acuity from baseline was -2.1 letters (standard deviation, 5.4 letters) with ranibizumab and -1.4 letters (standard deviation, 7.7 letters) with sham (adjusted difference = -0.8 letters [95% CI, -3.7 to 2.2 letters]; P = 0.62). The proportion of eyes that lost at least 10 letters of visual acuity from baseline at 24 months was 2 of 39 (5%) with ranibizumab and 4 of 40 (10%) with sham. There were no serious ocular adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Quarterly dosing of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in eyes with intermediate AMD did not reduce the incidence of nAMD compared with sham injections; however, the study was likely underpowered given the 95% CI, and a clinically meaningful effect cannot be excluded. There also was no effect on visual acuity at 24 months. Other strategies to reduce neovascular conversion in these vulnerable eyes are needed.

Treat and extend regimen with aflibercept for chronic central retinal vein occlusions: 2 year results of the NEWTON study.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY) could continue to extend the macular edema free interval in patients on a treat and extend (TAE) with non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusions (CRVOs) previously treated with ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) or bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) in the second year. METHODS: Twenty patients with macular edema secondary to non-ischemic CRVOs previously treated with ranibizumab or bevacizumab were prospectively treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) using a TAE dosing regimen. Injection frequencies were extended 2 weeks if there were no signs of disease activity on OCT or change in visual acuity. In the second year of the study, patients who have recurrences of macular edema could be re-challenged with a longer treatment interval under the following criterion: absence of any macular edema on three consecutive visits with the same treatment interval. RESULTS: Twenty patients had an average duration of a CRVO for 22 months (range 7-90) and averaged an anti-VEGF treatment every 42 days (range 28-60 days). The macular edema free interval increased from 38 to 75 days when switched to aflibercept (p = 0.000003) at month 24. There was an average increase of 37 days (median 34 days; range 0-91 days) in the macular edema free interval with aflibercept. At the month 24 visit, 50% (8/16) went > 12 weeks with a macular edema free interval between IAI. There was an improvement in vision (+ 8 ETDRS letters, p = 0.006) and decreased retinal thickness (158 µm, p = 0.00003) with aflibercept treatment at month 24. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year results of the NEWTON study demonstrated the sustained benefits of a TAE dosing regimen with aflibercept in patients with chronic CRVOs. The visual acuity gains and anatomic improvements observed at year one were maintained through month 24 with less visits and treatments. This may help minimize the treatment burden in patients with recurrent macular edema secondary to non-ischemic CRVO.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01870427, Registered June 6, 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01870427?cond=NEWTON&rank=1.Presented at the RETICON 2017: The Retina Congress with Live Surgery, Chennai, India-April 2017.

Aflibercept for Previously Treated Macular Edema Associated with Central Retinal Vein Occlusions: 1-Year Results of the NEWTON Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) can extend the macular edema-free interval in patients with nonischemic central retinal vein occlusions (CRVOs) previously treated with ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) or bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA). DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm, interventional study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with chronic nonischemic CRVOs. METHODS: Patients with nonischemic CRVOs previously treated with ranibizumab or bevacizumab were switched to aflibercept. The inclusion criteria included treatment for ≥6 months with ≥3 initial loading doses and evidence of recurrence of edema when treatment with either ranibizumab or bevacizumab extended beyond 4 weeks. Intravitreal aflibercept was administered with a treat-and-extend dosing regimen. Injection frequencies were extended 2 weeks if there were no signs of disease activity on OCT or change in visual acuity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Macular edema-free interval at week 52. RESULTS: Twenty patients had an average duration of a CRVO for 22 months (range, 7-90 months) and averaged an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment every 42 days (range, 28-60 days). These patients received a mean of 15 treatments (range, 5-47 treatments) of ranibizumab or bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to nonischemic CRVO. Among the 17 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up, 94% had a greater macular edema-free interval with aflibercept treatment. The macular edema-free interval increased from 5.4 weeks to 9.1 weeks when treatment was switched to aflibercept (P = 0.000003). There was an average increase of 26 days (range, 0-63 days) in the macular edema free interval with aflibercept. There was an improvement in vision (+6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, P = 0.02) and decreased retinal thickness (152 µm, P = 0.0002) with aflibercept treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients previously treated with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for macular edema due to nonischemic CRVO, aflibercept increased the macular edema free interval. This may help minimize the treatment burden in patients with recurrent macular edema secondary to nonischemic CRVO.

PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF A SUSTAINED-RELEASE DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT FOR CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA IN QUIESCENT UVEITIS.

PURPOSE: To investigate dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant; OZURDEX, Allergan, Inc) in the treatment of uveitic cystoid macular edema that had persisted in the absence of intraocular inflammation. METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series, 10 patients with uveitic cystoid macular edema and quiescent uveitis were treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant at baseline and evaluated monthly for one year. Patients were retreated whenever cystoid macular edema recurred. The primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at day 90. RESULTS: At day 90, mean improvement from baseline BCVA was 14.4 letters (P = 0.0003), 70% of patients had a ≥10 letter BCVA improvement, 50% of patients had a ≥15 letter BCVA improvement, and the mean decrease from baseline central subfield retinal thickness was 140 µm (P = 0.008). Improvements were maintained through day 360 with retreatment as needed. At day 360, mean improvement in BCVA was 16.5 letters (P = 0.006) and the mean decrease in central subfield retinal thickness was 158 µm (P = 0.002). One patient experienced intraocular pressure >25 mmHg (managed with topical medication). Two phakic patients (2/8; 25%) had worsening of lens opacity requiring cataract extraction. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone intravitreal implant may be an effective treatment for patients with persistent cystoid macular edema in quiescent uveitis.

INCREASING SLEEP DURATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY AND AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

PURPOSE: Sleeping too much or too little has been associated with adverse health outcomes including total mortality, cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. This study explored the relationship between sleep patterns and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: One thousand and three consecutive patients in a retina practice were prospectively surveyed regarding sleep histories. Each patient then had a masked ophthalmic examination and was graded on the modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy System. The relationship between AMD grade and sleep hours was analyzed in a logistic regression model. Multivariable analysis was performed after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking history. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, controlling for age, gender, and smoking history, sleep hours are not associated with neovascular AMD (P = 0.97) but are associated with geographic atrophy (P = 0.02). Sleeping >8 hours is associated with geographic atrophy (age-adjusted odds ratio, 7.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-31.6) compared with patients without AMD. CONCLUSION: Longer sleep duration is associated with geographic atrophy secondary to AMD. These altered sleep patterns may be another morbidity of AMD, but further study is necessary.

Influence of Glycosylated Hemoglobin on the Efficacy of Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Post Hoc Analysis of the RIDE/RISE Trials.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on treatment outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving intravitreal ranibizumab. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of 2 identical phase III clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab in DME over 36 months (RIDE: NCT00473382/RISE: NCT00473330). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 483 adults with vision loss from DME treated with ranibizumab were included in this analysis from RIDE/RISE. Participants received monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in visual and anatomic outcomes, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity score, between subgroups of patients with baseline HbA1c ≤7% versus HbA1c >7% at 36 months. RESULTS: There were 195 patients in RIDE/RISE who were treated with ranibizumab with a baseline HbA1c ≤7% and 288 patients with a baseline HbA1c >7% included in this analysis. The mean improvement in visual acuity (VA) at 36 months was +13 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in patients with baseline HbA1c ≤7% compared with +11 ETDRS letters in the patients with a baseline HbA1c >7% (P = 0.17). After adjustment for baseline central foveal thickness (CFT) and duration of diabetes, the mean CFT reduction was -268 µm in patients with a baseline HbA1c ≤7% and -269 µm in patients with a baseline HbA1c >7% (P = 0.98; 95% confidence interval, -22.93 to 23.54). The proportion of patients with a ≥2-step improvement in DR severity score was 38% in patients with baseline HbA1c ≤7% compared with 41% in the patients with a baseline HbA1c >7% (P = 0.53). There was no correlation of baseline HbA1c with any visual or anatomic parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in VA, anatomic reduction of macular edema, and improvement in DR severity score with ranibizumab treatment seem to be independent of baseline HbA1c.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for pseudophakic cystoid macular edema in patients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Diabetic patients are at a higher risk of developing pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) after cataract surgery. This study evaluated the effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX Implant 0.7 mg, Ozurdex; Allergan, Irvine, CA) in diabetic patients with PCME. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective case series, six patients with diabetes who developed PCME despite topical anti-inflammatory therapy were treated with a single dexamethasone implant. Outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfoveal thickness. RESULTS: The mean increase in BCVA from baseline to day 180 was 14 letters (P = .03); four of six patients (67%) achieved greater than 10-letter improvement in BCVA. The mean decrease in central subfoveal thickness was 100 µm (P < .01 vs baseline) by day 30 and 72 µm by day 180 (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: A dexamethasone implant may be an effective treatment for diabetic patients who develop pseudophakic cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery.

Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly or as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). DESIGN: Twenty-four-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active treatment-controlled phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 1098) ≥ 50 years of age with treatment-naïve subfoveal wet AMD. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg monthly or PRN after 3 monthly loading doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at month 12. Key secondary end points included mean change in BCVA from baseline at month 24, proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in BCVA, mean number of ranibizumab injections, and mean change in central foveal thickness from baseline over time by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ocular and systemic safety events also were evaluated through month 24. RESULTS: At month 24, the mean change from baseline in BCVA was (letters) +9.1 (0.5 mg monthly), +7.9 (0.5 mg PRN), +8.0 (2.0 mg monthly), and +7.6 (2.0 mg PRN). The change in mean BCVA from month 12 to 24 was (letters) -1.0, -0.3, -1.2, and -1.0, respectively. The proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline in BCVA at month 24 was 34.5%, 33.1%, 37.6%, and 34.8%, respectively. The mean number of ranibizumab injections through month 24 was 21.4, 13.3, 21.6, and 11.2, respectively; 5.6 and 4.3 mean injections were required in year 2 in the 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. The average treatment interval in the 0.5 mg PRN group was 9.9 weeks after 3 monthly loading doses, and 93% of these patients did not require monthly dosing. Ocular and systemic safety profiles over 2 years were similar among all 4 treatment groups and were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD. CONCLUSIONS: At month 24, mean BCVA improvements were clinically meaningful and similar among all 4 ranibizumab treatment groups. The 0.5 mg PRN group achieved a mean gain of 7.9 letters at month 24 with an average of 13.3 injections (5.6 injections in year 2). No new safety events were identified over 24 months.

Comparing retinal thickness measurements from Cirrus spectral domain- and Stratus time domain-optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare retinal measurements obtained using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography with measurements obtained using time domain-optical coherence tomography. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy subjects were recruited at three university-based and one community-based retina practice for a cross-sectional observational study. For each subject, one eye was enrolled as the study eye. A Stratus Fast Macular scan was performed, and a Cirrus 200 x 200 Macular Cube scan was performed. Both instruments segment the acquired images to generate retinal thickness values and report averages measured in nine subfields defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. These average values were compared with each other quantitatively using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Of the recruited subjects, 283 had acceptable images taken on the same day with both the Cirrus and Stratus devices. Mean differences between the instruments were noted in all subfields for all disease categories and ranged from 29 microm (outer superior subfield) to 54 microm (central subfield). CONCLUSION: Differences between time domain and spectral domain measurements of retinal thickness depend on pathology and location. Comparisons across instruments should be made with caution.