American Society of Echocardiography COVID-19 Statement Update: Lessons Learned and Preparation for Future Pandemics.

The COVID-19 pandemic has evolved since the publication of the initial American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) statements providing guidance to echocardiography laboratories. In light of new developments, the ASE convened a diverse, expert writing group to address the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic and to apply lessons learned to echocardiography laboratory operations in future pandemics. This statement addresses important areas specifically impacted by the current and future pandemics: (1) indications for echocardiography, (2) application of echocardiographic services in a pandemic, (3) infection/transmission mitigation strategies, (4) role of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound/critical care echocardiography, and (5) training in echocardiography.

A Summary of the American Society of Echocardiography Foundation Value-Based Healthcare: Summit 2014: The Role of Cardiovascular Ultrasound in the New Paradigm.

Value-Based Healthcare: Summit 2014 clearly achieved the three goals set forth at the beginning of this document. First, the live event informed and educated attendees through a discussion of the evolving value-based healthcare environment, including a collaborative effort to define the important role of cardiovascular ultrasound in that environment. Second, publication of these Summit proceedings in the Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography will inform a wider audience of the important insights gathered. Third, moving forward, the ASE will continue to build a ''living resource'' on its website, http://www.asecho.org, for clinicians, researchers, and administrators to use in advocating for the value of cardiovascular ultrasound in the new value-based healthcare environment. The ASE looks forward to incorporating many of the Summit recommendations as it works with its members, legislators, payers, hospital administrators, and researchers to demonstrate and increase the value of cardiovascular ultrasound. All Summit attendees shared in the infectious enthusiasm generated by this proactive approach to ensuring cardiovascular ultrasound's place as ''The Value Choice'' in cardiac imaging.

Achieving high-value cardiac imaging: challenges and opportunities.

Cardiac imaging is under intense scrutiny as a contributor to health care costs, with multiple initiatives under way to reduce and eliminate inappropriate testing. Appropriate use criteria are valuable guides to selecting imaging studies but until recently have focused on the test rather than the patient. Patient-centered means are needed to define the true value of imaging for patients in specific clinical situations. This article provides a definition of high-value cardiac imaging. A paradigm to judge the efficacy of echocardiography in the absence of randomized controlled trials is presented. Candidate clinical scenarios are proposed in which echocardiography constitutes high-value imaging, as well as stratagems to increase the likelihood that high-value cardiac imaging takes place in those circumstances.

Characterization and normal measurements of the left ventricular outflow tract by ECG-gated cardiac CT: implications for disorders of the outflow tract and aortic valve.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Studies suggest that electrocardiographically gated coronary computed tomographic angiography provides a clear definition of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), and normal LVOT morphology may not be round, as assumed when the continuity equation is applied during echocardiography. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the morphology of the LVOT on coronary computed tomographic angiography and to establish normal values for LVOT measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two independent readers retrospectively measured anterior-posterior (AP) and transverse diameters of the LVOT and performed LVOT planimetry on coronary computed tomographic angiographic studies of 106 consecutive patients with normal aortic valves. RESULTS: Excellent interobserver agreement was observed for all measurements (r = 0.78-0.94). The LVOT was ovoid, with a larger transverse diameter than AP diameter during diastole and systole (P < .001). However, the ratio of AP diameter to transverse diameter was closer to 1.0 during systole (P < .001). Mean indexed LVOT area was minimally larger in systole than in diastole (P = .01-.04) and was larger in men than in women during diastole (P ≤ .001) and systole (P ≤ .01). Mean LVOT area indexed to body surface area was 2.3 ± 0.5 cm(2)/m(2) in women and 2.6 ± 0.7 cm(2)/m(2) in men. LVOT area demonstrated significant correlation with aortic root diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The normal LVOT is ovoid in shape. LVOT is more circular during systole, but the AP diameter remains smaller than the transverse diameter throughout the cardiac cycle. The oval shape of the LVOT has important implications when LVOT area is calculated from LVOT diameters. Normal LVOT area values established in this study should facilitate diagnosis of the fixed component of LVOT obstruction.

Prediction of Homograft Aortic Valve Size by Transthoracic and Transesophageal Two-Dimensional Echocardiography.

To avoid the problem of patient valve mismatch we assessed the reliability of echocardiographic measurements in selecting an appropriate-sized homograft aortic valve. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed in 26 consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a cryopreserved human homograft; 19 of the patients also had intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TTE). The diameters of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and ascending aorta were measured by the same technique in all patients. There was a strong correlation between LVOT diameter measured by intraoperative TEE and homograft aortic valve size selected by the surgeon (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). A good correlation was also found between LVOT measured by preoperative TTE and the homograft valve size (r = 0.82, P = 0.001). The correlation between the homograft aortic valve size and the diameter of aortic annulus was less optimal; the correlation was poor for the diameter of aorta measured at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva and ascending aorta. Measurement of the LVOT diameter by intraoperative TEE and preoperative TTE is reliable and clinically useful for the preparation of homograft aortic valves and selection of proper size, particularly in those patients undergoing repeat aortic valve replacement, with heavily calcified aortic valve or with ascending aortic aneurysm.