Four-dimensional computed tomography: musculoskeletal applications.

Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), or dynamic CT, is an emerging modality with a wealth of orthopedic applications for both clinical practice and research. This technology creates CT volumes of a moving structure at multiple time points to depict real-time motion. Recent advances in acquisition technology and reduction in radiation dosage have allowed for increased adoption of the modality and have made imaging of joint motion feasible and safe. Musculoskeletal 4DCT has been used primarily to investigate wrist motion; however, the utility of 4DCT has been shown in other areas, including the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee and ankle. Imaging these joints through a full range of motion provides new insight into dynamic phenomena such as instability, impingement and joint kinematics. Although 4DCT has not yet been widely adopted in orthopedic practice and research, future use has the potential to enable a deeper understanding of musculoskeletal conditions and to improve patient care.

In Vivo Syndesmotic Motion After Rigid and Flexible Fixation Using 4-Dimensional Computerized Tomography.

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining reduction after syndesmotic injury is crucial to patient function; however, malreduction remains common. Flexible suture button fixation may allow more physiologic motion of the syndesmosis compared with rigid screw fixation. Conventional syndesmotic imaging fails to account for physiologic syndesmotic motion with ankle range of motion (ROM), providing misleading results. Four-dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) can image joints through a dynamic ROM. Our purpose was to compare syndesmotic motion after rigid and flexible fixation using 4DCT. METHODS: We analyzed 13 patients with syndesmotic injury who were randomized to receive rigid (n = 7) or flexible (n = 6) fixation. Patients underwent bilateral ankle 4DCT while moving between ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. Measures of syndesmotic position and rotation were extracted from 4DCT to determine syndesmotic motion as a function of ankle ROM. RESULTS: Uninjured ankles demonstrated significant decreases in syndesmotic width of 1.0 mm with ankle plantar flexion (SD = 0.6 mm, P < 0.01). Initial rigid fixation demonstrated reduced motion compared with uninjured ankles in 4 of 5 measures (P < 0.01) despite all patients in the rigid fixation group having removed, loose, or broken screws by the time of imaging. Rigid fixation led to less motion than flexible fixation in 3 measures (P = 0.02-0.04). There were no observed differences in syndesmotic position or motion between flexible fixation and uninjured ankles. CONCLUSION: Despite the loss of fixation in all subjects in the rigid fixation group, initial rigid fixation led to significantly reduced syndesmotic motion. Flexible fixation recreated more physiologic motion compared with rigid fixation and may be used to reduce rates of syndesmotic malreduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis of Normal Syndesmotic Motion.

BACKGROUND: The syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibiofibular joint while allowing for small amounts of physiologic motion. When injured, malreduction of the syndesmosis is the most important factor that contributes to inferior functional outcomes. Syndesmotic reduction is a dynamic measure, which is not adequately captured by conventional computed tomography (CT). Four-dimensional CT (4DCT) can image joints as they move through range of motion (ROM). The aim of this study was to employ 4DCT to determine in vivo syndesmotic motion with ankle ROM in uninjured ankles. METHODS: Uninjured ankles were analyzed in patients who had contralateral syndesmotic injuries, as well as a cohort of healthy volunteers with bilateral uninjured ankles. Bilateral ankle 4DCT scans were performed as participants moved their ankles between maximal dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Multiple measures of syndesmotic width, as well as sagittal translation and fibular rotation, were automatically extracted from 4DCT using a custom program to determine the change in syndesmotic position with ankle ROM. RESULTS: Fifty-eight ankles were analyzed. Measures of syndesmotic width decreased by 0.7 to 1.1 mm as the ankle moved from dorsiflexion to plantarflexion (P < .001 for each measure). The fibula externally rotated by 1.2 degrees with ankle ROM (P < .001), but there was no significant motion in the sagittal plane (P = .43). No participants with bilateral uninjured ankles had a side-to-side difference in syndesmotic width of 2 mm or greater. CONCLUSION: 4DCT allows accurate, in vivo syndesmotic measurements, which change with ankle ROM, confirming prior work that was limited to biomechanical studies. Side-to-side syndesmotic measurements are consistent within subjects, validating the method of templating syndesmotic reduction off the contralateral ankle, in a consistent ankle position, to achieve anatomic reduction of syndesmotic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Presurgical language fMRI and postsurgical deficits: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we conducted a retrospective investigation of our initial single-centre experience with the clinical use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of hemisphere dominance for language processing (i.e., language lateralization). We demonstrated its association with surgical outcome and its potential impact on surgical planning and patient management. METHODS: Fifty-two cases were reviewed, covering the period from July 2007 to July 2010. Clinical fMRI reports were examined to determine the hemisphere dominance for language processing. Neurological reports were examined to determine if new language deficits were present post-surgery. Neurosurgeon notes were also reviewed to determine if fMRI had an impact on surgical planning. RESULTS: Of the cases reviewed, 49 (94%) generated conclusive fMRI. Eleven (22%) patients exhibited fMRI language lateralization contralateral to pathology; zero of nine of these patients that had surgery experienced post-surgical deficits. Twenty-two (44%) patients exhibited fMRI language lateralization ipsilateral to pathology; three of 13 of these patients that had surgery experienced post-surgical deficits. Sixteen (34%) patients exhibited bilateral lateralization of language; five of 13 of these patients that had surgery experienced post-surgery deficits. Several post-fMRI reports indicated that fMRI results had an impact on surgical planning. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that fMRI demonstrations of language processing within the hemisphere ipsilateral to pathology (either ipsilateral alone or bilateral) is associated with a greater risk for post-surgical language deficits, and in these cases, fMRI results should be taken into consideration for pre-surgical planning.IRMf du langage avant la chirurgie et déficits après la chirurgie : expérience d'un centre.