Intraoperative Intra-articular Antibiotic Injection Reduces Infection in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Deep infection is a debilitating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that an intra-articular, intraoperative injection of antibiotics would result in a lower infection rate compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. Before 2007, 164 patients (group A) did not receive intra-articular antibiotics. From 2007 to 2018, 1324 patients (group B) received intra-articular antibiotics. Patients received intra-articular gentamicin at the end of surgery with the addition of 1 g of cefazolin in January 2014. Records were retrospectively reviewed for comorbidities, type of surgery, and infection. The cohort that received intra-articular antibiotics was compared with the cohort that did not to determine the effect of prophylactic intra-articular antibiotic administration in preventing infection. There was 1 deep infection in the antibiotic group compared with 5 in the non-antibiotic group (P<.001). Superficial infections developed in 2 cases of patients treated with antibiotics; there were no superficial infections in patients treated without antibiotics (P=.62). One previous study evaluated intra-articular injection of antibiotics for shoulder arthroplasty and found significantly lower rates of infection with the injection of intra-articular gentamicin. In this retrospective follow-up study, the injection of intra-articular gentamicin or gentamicin and cefazolin effectively decreased rates of postoperative infection. At mean follow-up of 399 days, intra-articular antibiotics at the time of surgery resulted in significantly fewer deep infections. Given the minimal risk of adverse events and minimal cost, this is a valid method of reducing infections in total shoulder arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):310-314.].

Protocol for a multicenter, randomised controlled trial of surgeon-directed home therapy vs. outpatient rehabilitation by physical therapists for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the SHORT trial.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a successful surgery with expanding indications. Outcomes may be influenced by post-operative rehabilitation; however, there is a dearth of research regarding optimal rehabilitation strategy following RTSA. The primary purpose of this study is to compare patient reported and clinical outcomes after RTSA in two groups: in one group rehabilitation is directed by formal, outpatient clinic-based physical therapists (PT group) as compared to a home therapy group, in which patients are instructed in their rehabilitative exercises by surgeons at post-operative appointments (HT group). Secondary aims include comparisons of complications, cost of care and quality of life between the two groups. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial has commenced at seven sites across the United States. Data is being collected on 200 subjects by clinical research assistants pre-operatively and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 year visits. The following variables are being assessed: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), pain level using the numeric pain scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and shoulder active and passive range of motion for analysis of the primary aim. Chi square and t-tests will be used to measure differences in baseline characteristics of both groups. Repeated measures linear mixed effects modeling for measurement of differences will be used for outcomes associated with ASES and SANE and scores, and range of motion measures. Secondary aims will be analyzed for comparison of complications, cost, and quality of life assessment scores using data obtained from the PROMIS 29 v. 2, questionnaires administered at standard of care post-operative visits, and the electronic health record. Subjects will be allowed to crossover between the PT and HT groups, and analysis will include both intention-to-treat including patients who crossed over, and a second with cross-over patients removed, truncated to the time they crossed over. DISCUSSION: RTSA is being performed with increasing frequency, and the optimal rehabilitation strategy is unclear. This study will help clarify the role of formal physical therapy with particular consideration to outcomes, cost, and complications. In addition, this study will evaluate a proposed rehabilitation strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered as NCT03719859 at ClincialTrials.gov .

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration.

Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is a rare yet increasingly recognized complication of immunization. Although a medicolegal term rather than a true diagnosis, SIRVA was introduced in 2010 by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program after an increase in claims filed for vaccine-related shoulder injury. Patients typically present with severe pain and limited range of motion within 48 hours of vaccination and may experience notable functional limitations. Although the underlying pathophysiology is incompletely understood, the existing literature suggests that SIRVA results from the inflammatory response produced when the vaccine is injected into tissues containing a preexisting antibody. Current treatment modalities include physical therapy, corticosteroid injections, and antiinflammatory medications. In some cases, surgery may be required to treat underlying pathology, such as rotator cuff or biceps tendinopathy. Although the available literature indicates modest improvement in patients with SIRVA undergoing treatment, current data are limited to case series. Larger, high-quality studies are needed to determine the natural history and optimal treatment of this increasingly prevalent condition.

Short-term outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a custom baseplate for severe glenoid deficiency.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Complex glenoid bone loss and deformity present a challenge for the shoulder arthroplasty surgeon. Eccentric reaming, bone grafting, augmented glenoid components, and salvage hemiarthroplasty are common strategies for managing these patients. The glenoid vault reconstruction system (VRS; Zimmer-Biomet) is a novel solution for both primary and revision arthroplasty using a custom glenoid baseplate. We hypothesized that patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with VRS would have acceptable short-term outcomes and complication rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent RSA with VRS for severe glenoid deformity or bone loss by one of 4 board-certified, fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons at 3 academic tertiary referral centers between September 2015 and November 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Patient data were obtained via medical record review and telephone questionnaires. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Penn Shoulder Scores, and range of motion (ROM) measurements were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Radiographs were reviewed at final follow-up for evidence of component loosening or hardware failure. Any complication was documented. Outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with P <. 05 considered significant. RESULTS: Twelve shoulders (11 patients) were included with a mean age of 68 years; 7 were primary arthroplasties and 5 were revisions. At an average follow-up time of 30 months, median improvement in NPRS score was 7 points, SANE score 43%, ASES score 45 points, and Penn Shoulder Score 49 points. There were statistically significant improvements in median ROM measurements (forward elevation 20°, external rotation 40°, internal rotation 2 spinal levels). At final follow-up, all implants were radiographically stable without loosening. There were no complications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that RSA using the custom VRS glenoid implant is a safe and effective technique addressing complex glenoid deformity or bone loss in both primary and revision settings. At short-term follow-up, all patient-reported outcomes and ROM measures improved significantly, and there were no complications. Future work should determine mid- and long-term outcomes, preferably in a prospective manner with defined patient populations.

Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults.

Fractures of the clavicle are common injuries that occur across all age groups but are most frequently seen in the young, active patient population. Among the different types of clavicle fractures, those occurring in the middle third of the clavicular shaft are the most common. Historically, most of these fractures were treated by closed means even when notable displacement was present. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in assessing the best treatment option for these patients. Although nonsurgical treatment is a reliable method for treating many of these fractures, more recent data suggest that fractures with notable displacement (>2 cm of shortening or >100% displacement) and/or comminution have better short-term outcomes and lower rates of nonunion with surgical management. Current surgical options include superior plating, anterior-inferior plating, dual plating, and intramedullary nail fixation.

Preoperative Testing for Hip Fracture Patients Delays Surgery, Prolongs Hospital Stays, and Rarely Dictates Care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how often preoperative testing is requested for geriatric hip fracture patients, to assess the extent to which preoperative testing is associated with delayed surgery, and to measure the frequency with which preoperative testing changes patient management. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Academic health system. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty consecutive geriatric hip fracture patients admitted through the emergency department and underwent surgery. INTERVENTION: Hip fracture surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The patients were categorized according to whether additional preoperative tests were requested. For each patient, the times of presentation and surgery were recorded, yielding a "time-to-surgery interval." The results of any tests, the actions resulting from testing, and the length of hospital stay were also noted. RESULTS: Additional preoperative testing was performed for 67 patients (27%). For those patients, the mean time-to-surgery was 73 hours. For the 183 patients who had no testing, the mean time-to-surgery was 37 hours. Moreover, 42 of the 67 patients with testing (63%) had time-to-surgery greater than 48 hours, compared with only 37 of the 183 (20%) patients without testing. The mean length of stay for tested patients was 12.0 days compared with 9.0 days for nontested patients. In only 2 of the 67 tested patients was further care offered based on the test result. CONCLUSIONS: Testing was associated with greater time-to-surgery and length of stay. Furthermore, testing rarely influenced management. Patients might be able to have surgery more expeditiously and leave the hospital earlier if testing were deferred. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient perception of physician reimbursement in elective shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: A previous study revealed that patients perceived physician reimbursement to be much higher than current Medicare schedules for hip and knee replacement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient perception of surgeon reimbursement for total shoulder replacement (TSA) and rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: The study surveyed 250 patients. Patients were asked what they believe a surgeon should be reimbursed for performing TSA and RCR. Patients were then asked to estimate what Medicare reimbursed for each of these procedures. We then revealed the Medicare reimbursement rate for TSA and RCR, and patients were asked to comment. Finally, patients were asked whether surgeons with advanced shoulder training should receive additional payments. RESULTS: Patients thought that surgeons should receive $13,178 for TSA and $8459 for RCR. Patients estimated actual Medicare reimbursement was $7177 for TSA and $4692 for RCR. Eighty percent of patients stated that Medicare reimbursement was too low for TSA, 75% thought that payment for RCR was lower than what it should be. Less than 1% of patients felt that it was higher than it should be. A total of 87% of patients thought that surgeons with advanced shoulder training should be reimbursed at a higher rate. CONCLUSION: Patients perceived the values of TSA and RCR were much higher than current Medicare schedules. This is in agreement with prior surveys. Continued decreases in Medicare reimbursements may force surgeons to not participate in Medicare and create a potential access issue. Further investigation should focus on identifying how many surgeons may opt out.

What went wrong and what was done about it: pitfalls in the treatment of common shoulder surgery.

When performing revision shoulder surgery, it is important that the surgeon understands why the index procedure failed and has a clear plan to address problems in the revision procedure. The most common cause of failure after anterior instability shoulder surgery is a failure to treat the underlying glenoid bone loss. For most defects, a Latarjet transfer can effectively restore anterior glenoid bone stock and restore shoulder stability. Persistent anterior shoulder pain after rotator cuff surgery may be the result of missed biceps pathology. This can be effectively treated via a biceps tenodesis. The most difficult failures to treat after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction surgery are those involving fractures of either the coracoid or the clavicle. Clavicle hook plates can be used as supplemental fixation during the treatment of these fractures to help offload the fracture site and allow healing while restoring stability to the acromioclavicular articulation. A failed hemiarthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture frequently results when the tuberosities fail to heal correctly. This complication can be avoided by paying close attention to the implant position and the tuberosity fixation. If hemiarthroplasty is unsuccessful, the patient is best treated with conversion to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Technical pitfalls of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fracture management.

Although most proximal humerus fractures can be treated nonoperatively, 4-part fractures and 3-part fractures/dislocations in elderly patients often require management with prosthetic arthroplasty. Reverse arthroplasty is gaining in popularity, but hemiarthroplasty still has a role in the management of 4-part and some 3-part fractures and dislocations. The 2 most important technical factors influencing functional outcome in hemiarthroplasty patients are the restoration of the patient's correct humeral head height and version, and healing of the greater and lesser tuberosities in an anatomic position. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture provides predictable pain relief, but functional recovery is much less predictable.

The musculoskeletal effects of perioperative smoking.

Although the carcinogenic consequences of smoking are well known, further research is needed on the effects of smoking on musculoskeletal health and surgical outcomes. Orthopaedic perioperative complications of smoking include impaired healing, increased infection, delayed and/or impaired fracture union and arthrodesis, and inferior arthroplasty outcomes. The incorporation of smoking cessation protocols such as transdermal patches, chewing gum, lozenges, inhalers, sprays, bupropion, and varenicline in the perioperative period may result in substantial benefits for patients' musculoskeletal and general health.

Evaluation of reliability of the Mason classification for radial head fractures.

In the study reported here, we sought to determine the interobserver reliability and the intraobserver reproductibility of the Mason classification. We also evaluated the effect of having an external rotation oblique view on agreement in radiographic readings. Four readers reviewed 50 radial head fracture radiographs approximately 2 months apart. Half the radiographs had an anteroposterior view and a lateral view; the other half had an additional external rotation oblique view. There was a trend toward improved interobserver agreement in the 3-view radiographs. Three of the 4 readers demonstrated substantial intraobserver reproducibility, which was noted to be higher when 3 views were available.

Arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: mid-term results in adolescent athletes.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum in adolescent athletes remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term results of arthroscopic treatment of OCD of the capitellum in a series of adolescents. METHODS: We identified 25 consecutive patients at our institution that underwent arthroscopic treatment for OCD of the capitellum since 1999. Ten elbows were treated by arthroscopic debridement and drilling alone, whereas 12 elbows required additional mini-arthrotomies for bone grafting or the removal of large loose bodies after arthroscopy. The clinical charts and operative reports of these patients were retrospectively reviewed for relevant clinical information including age, sport, character of symptoms, preoperative and postoperative range of motion, return to sport, and postoperative complications. Twenty-one patients (22 elbows) were reached to determine their current elbow function and athletic activity using the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score. RESULTS: The average age of the patients in our series was 13.1 years. All patients participated in organized athletics that involved the upper extremity and had undergone an average of 10.2 months of nonoperative treatment before surgery. At a mean follow-up of 48 months, the patients gained an average of 17 degrees of extension and 10 degrees of flexion after surgery. Both the improvement in flexion and extension were statistically significant compared with the preoperative range of motions (P=0.001, P=0.01). When patients were asked to rate their elbow function from 0% to 100% using the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, the average rating was 87%. Eighteen of 21 patients (86%) returned to participate in their sport at their preinjury level. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic management of capitellar OCD in adolescent athletes results in significantly improved range of motion and a high rate of return to athletics. Accompanying arthrotomy may be required for large loose body removal or bone grafting.

Functional outcomes of early arthroscopic bankart repair in adolescents aged 11 to 18 years.

Recurrent shoulder instability can significantly affect a patient's quality of life and place them at risk for extensive soft tissue and bony injury with repeated dislocations. Literature on the operative management of recurrent instability in pediatric patients is limited, as most studies include pediatric patients within a larger sample group comprised primarily of adults. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the role of early arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) after anterior shoulder dislocation or subluxation in a pure pediatric population. We retrospectively reviewed 32 consecutive ABRs in 30 pediatric patients. Sixteen shoulders failed initial nonoperative therapy before ABR, whereas surgical stabilization was the primary treatment in 16 shoulders after initial evaluation at our institution. There were 17 males and 13 females with an average age of 15.4 years (age range, 11-18 years). The average follow-up was 25.2 months. Functional outcomes were measured using the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) score. In the initial nonoperative group, the average SANE score was 92.2. There were 3 shoulder redislocations in 2 patients (18.75%). In the 16 shoulders treated with ABR as initial therapy, the average SANE score was 91.8, and there were 2 shoulder redislocations in 2 patients (12.5%). We conclude that primary ABR is an effective treatment of traumatically induced shoulder instability in pediatric patients. Primary ABR limits multiple recurring shoulder dislocations that hinder a patient's quality of life and places them at risk for future negative sequelae.

Combined anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries in adolescents.

Although literature supports bracing of most medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries followed by arthroscopic repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in adults with combined ACL-MCL injuries, little is published regarding the treatment of these injuries in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to present our outcomes after treatment of combined ACL-MCL injuries in a series of adolescents. All 180 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction at our children's hospital from January 1997 to January 2003 were reviewed to identify those patients with concomitant grade II or III MCL injuries. Clinical data were obtained from chart review. All patients were treated with a hinged brace for their MCL injury followed by delayed arthroscopic reconstruction of their ACL using a transphyseal technique with Achilles tendon soft tissue allograft. Patients were contacted by phone to complete Lysholm knee questionnaires and assess return to athletic competition. Data were compared with a control cohort of patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction using the same technique. Twelve (6.7%) of 180 patients had combined ACL-MCL injuries. There were 6 boys and 6 girls; the mean age was 15.6 years (range, 14-17 years). Follow-up averaged 5.3 years (range, 2.6-8.2 years), and no patients were lost to follow-up. At last examination, all patients had a stable knee on both Lachman and valgus stress tests; the mean Lysholm knee score was 96 (range, 94-100). All patients were able to return to their preinjury level of athletics. One patient required manipulation for arthrofibrosis. When compared with the control group of 19 isolated ACL reconstructions, there was no significant difference with regards to Lysholm scores or return to athletics. Bracing of grade 2 or 3 MCL injuries followed by ACL reconstruction was an effective means of treating combined ACL-MCL injuries in this small series of adolescent patients.