Diabetes Management According to Health Status in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Staying in Geriatric Care Facilities.

BACKGROUND: About 25% of adults >70 years suffer from type 2 diabetes. Due to the heterogeneity of the geriatric population, guidelines emphasize the need to individualize glycemic goals and simplify treatment strategies with the main focus of avoiding hypoglycemia. The aim of this study was to assess glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in geriatric care facilities based on their individual health status. METHODS: 170 medical records of older adults with type 2 diabetes in geriatric care facilities were retrospectively assessed (64.7% female, age 80 ± 9 years; glycated hemoglobin 6.8% ± 3.6% [51 ± 16 mmol/mol]; body mass index 27.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2). Based on the individual health status, patients were allocated to three groups (healthy n = 27, complex n = 86, and poor n = 57). RESULTS: The overall blood glucose (BG) value was highest in the poor health group with 188 ± 47 mg/dL (poor) vs 167 ± 42 mg/dL (complex) vs 150 ± 34 mg/dL (healthy). BG values of 1.6% (poor) vs 2.8% (complex) vs 1.5% (healthy) of patients were below 90 mg/dL. 36.8% (poor) vs 23.4% (complex) vs 18.5% (healthy) of patients received insulin as the main diabetes therapy, but of these only 14.3% (poor) vs 20% (complex) vs 40% (healthy) were treated with basal insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, BG values were higher in the poor and complex health group. There were a few low BG values in all groups. Although recommended by international guidelines, basal insulin therapy with its low complexity and low hypoglycemic risk is still underused, especially in the poor health group. Therefore, simplification of diabetes therapy should be considered further.

The MAINTAIN study--managing hemoglobin variability with darbepoetin alfa in dialysis patients experiencing a severe drop in hemoglobin.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis patients, receiving erythropoiesis stimulating agents, typically show signs of hemoglobin variability as a consequence of their dosing patterns, bleeding, infection, etc., which is commonly managed adjusting the dose regimen of the erythropoiesis stimulating agent. However, information on dosing strategies used in daily clinical practice and their outcomes in relation to hemoglobin variability is limited. OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical practice in Austria in relation with the management of hemoglobin variability, defined as a decrease of ³ 1 g/dL within 4 weeks from ³ 11 g/dL to £ 11 g/dL during maintenance therapy with darbepoetin alfa. The nature and incidence of clinical events related to the hemoglobin drop were also assessed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The MAINTAIN non-interventional study was conducted in hemodialysis patients, receiving darbepoetin alfa in accordance to the label approved in the European Union at that time. Patient data were documented retrospectively for the 3 months prior to the hemoglobin drop. Data for the 6 months post hemoglobin drop were collected retrospectively or prospectively, depending on the time of patient inclusion respective to the Hb drop. RESULTS: A hundred thirty six of 154 patients fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria and had prospective documentation of 6 months. The main causes for the hemoglobin drop included surgical and medical procedures (36.1 %), and infections or infestations (24.4 %). The median treatment period was 273 days. The mean hemoglobin drop was - 1.74 g/dL (95 % confidence interval (CI): - 1.60 to - 1.87). Consequently, 81 % of the patients had their dose of darbepoetin alfa increased within a median Kaplan-Meier time to dose increase of 12.5 days (95 % CI: 6-22). The geometric mean weekly darbepoetin alfa dose increased by a factor of 1.1 from 29.1 mg (95 % CI: 24.6-34.4) in the 3 months before hemoglobin drop to 32.4 (95 % CI: 27.2-38.6) in months 4-6 post hemoglobin drop. Three patients had red blood cell transfusions before hemoglobin drop and nine patients after hemoglobin drop. The mean hemoglobin increase was 0.43 g/dL (95 % CI: 0.24-0.62) from immediately prior to 2 weeks after dose increase. The median Kaplan-Meier time to achieve a hemoglobin ³ 11 g/dL after hemoglobin drop was 36 days (95 % CI: 32-45). Frequent darbepoetin alfa dose adjustments were necessary to sustain maintenance levels. No drug-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study describes physicians' reactions to a drop in hemoglobin in clinical practice. Using darbepoetin alfa, the drop was generally compensated without leading to overcorrection.

Exit-site care in Austrian peritoneal dialysis centers -- a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated infections markedly contribute to treatment failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. There is much controversy surrounding prophylactic strategies to prevent these infections. METHODS: In this nationwide multicenter study we analyzed strategies to prevent catheter-associated infections as performed in Austrian PD centers in 2006. A questionnaire was sent to all 23 PD centers in Austria. RESULTS: Ten different catheter models were used in the 332 patients being treated in the 23 Austrian PD centers. Systemic antibiotics prior to catheter placement were given by 17 of the 23 PD centers (glycopeptides, n = 7; cephalosporins, n = 10). Nasal swabs were taken preoperatively by 17 PD centers; nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriers were treated prophylactically with mupirocin cream in 15 of these centers. Dressing change was routinely performed in 318 of 332 chronic PD patients (nonocclusive film dressing, n = 58; gauze dressing, n = 260). Disinfectants for chronic exit-site care included povidone iodine (n = 155), sodium hypochlorite (n = 31), povidone iodine + sodium hypochlorite together (n = 102), and octenidine dihydrochloride/phenoxyethanol (n = 17). Water + non-disinfectant soap or 0.9% sodium chloride was administered as a cleansing agent to the exit site by 27 patients. Routine S. aureus screening (nasal and/or exit-site swabs) in chronic PD patients was performed in 12 PD centers; carriers were treated with mupirocin cream in 11 of these centers. Dialysis staff members were screened for S. aureus in 8 PD centers and spouses were screened for S. aureus in 5 PD centers. The overall exit-site infection rate was 1 episode/43.9 patient-months, tunnel infection rate was 1 episode/88.9 patient-months, and peritonitis rate was 1 episode/51.0 patient-months. Patients of centers that have installed a prophylaxis protocol for treating S. aureus carriers had lower mean infection rates compared with those not using such a protocol. CONCLUSION: Various individual prophylactic strategies are used to prevent catheter-associated infections in Austrian PD centers. Infection rates are within the range reported in the literature. There is still scope for improvement in some centers (e.g., by establishing a prophylaxis protocol).