Echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery wedge pressure: invasive derivation, validation, and prognostic association beyond diastolic dysfunction grading.

AIMS: Grading of diastolic function can be useful, but indeterminate classifications are common. We aimed to invasively derive and validate a quantitative echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and to compare its prognostic performance to diastolic dysfunction grading. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic measures were used to derive an estimated PAWP (ePAWP) using multivariable linear regression in patients undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC). Prognostic associations were analysed in the National Echocardiography Database of Australia (NEDA). In patients who had undergone both RHC and echocardiography within 2 h (n = 90), ePAWP was derived using left atrial volume index, mitral peak early velocity (E), and pulmonary vein systolic velocity (S). In a separate external validation cohort (n = 53, simultaneous echocardiography and RHC), ePAWP showed good agreement with invasive PAWP (mean ± standard deviation difference 0.5 ± 5.0 mmHg) and good diagnostic accuracy for estimating PAWP >15 mmHg [area under the curve (95% confidence interval) 0.94 (0.88-1.00)]. Among patients in NEDA [n = 38,856, median (interquartile range) follow-up 4.8 (2.3-8.0) years, 2756 cardiovascular deaths], ePAWP was associated with cardiovascular death even after adjustment for age, sex, and diastolic dysfunction grading [hazard ratio (HR) 1.08 (1.07-1.09) per mmHg] and provided incremental prognostic information to diastolic dysfunction grading (improved C-statistic from 0.65 to 0.68, P < 0.001). Increased ePAWP was associated with worse prognosis across all grades of diastolic function [HR normal, 1.07 (1.06-1.09); indeterminate, 1.08 (1.07-1.09); abnormal, 1.08 (1.07-1.09), P < 0.001 for all]. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic ePAWP is an easily acquired continuous variable with good accuracy that associates with prognosis beyond diastolic dysfunction grading.

Impact of Vasodilation on Oxygen-Enhanced Functional Lung MRI at 0.55 T.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (OE-MRI) can be used to assess regional lung function without ionizing radiation. Inhaled oxygen acts as a T1-shortening contrast agent to increase signal in T1-weighted (T1w) images. However, increase in proton density from pulmonary hyperoxic vasodilation may also contribute to the measured signal enhancement. Our aim was to quantify the relative contributions of the T1-shortening and vasodilatory effects of oxygen to signal enhancement in OE-MRI in both swine and healthy volunteers. METHODS: We imaged 14 anesthetized female swine (47 ± 8 kg) using a prototype 0.55 T high-performance MRI system while experimentally manipulating oxygenation and blood volume independently through oxygen titration, partial occlusion of the vena cava for volume reduction, and infusion of colloid fluid (6% hydroxyethyl starch) for volume increase. Ten healthy volunteers were imaged before, during, and after hyperoxia. Two proton density-weighted (PDw) and 2 T1w ultrashort echo time images were acquired per experimental state. The median PDw and T1w percent signal enhancement (PSE), compared with baseline room air, was calculated after image registration and correction for lung volume changes. Differences in median PSE were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The PSE in PDw images after 100% oxygen was similar in swine (1.66% ± 1.41%, P = 0.01) and in healthy volunteers (1.99% ± 1.79%, P = 0.02), indicating that oxygen-induced pulmonary vasodilation causes ~2% lung proton density increase. The PSE in T1w images after 100% oxygen was also similar (swine, 9.20% ± 1.68%, P < 0.001; healthy volunteers, 10.10% ± 3.05%, P < 0.001). The PSE in T1w enhancement was oxygen dose-dependent in anesthetized swine, and we measured a dose-dependent PDw image signal increase from infused fluids. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of oxygen-induced vasodilation to T1w OE-MRI signal was measurable using PDw imaging and was found to be ~2% in both anesthetized swine and in healthy volunteers. This finding may have implications for patients with regional or global hypoxia or vascular dysfunction undergoing OE-MRI and suggest that PDw imaging may be useful to account for oxygen-induced vasodilation in OE-MRI.

An electrocardiography score predicts heart failure hospitalization or death beyond that of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provide powerful prognostic information. The aim was to determine their relative prognostic value. Patients (n = 783) undergoing CMR and 12-lead ECG with a QRS duration < 120 ms were included. Prognosis scores for one-year event-free survival from hospitalization for heart failure or death were derived using continuous ECG or CMR measures, and multivariable logistic regression, and compared. Patients (median [interquartile range] age 55 [43-64] years, 44% female) had 155 events during 5.7 [4.4-6.6] years. The ECG prognosis score included (1) frontal plane QRS-T angle, and (2) heart rate corrected QT duration (QTc) (log-rank 55). The CMR prognosis score included (1) global longitudinal strain, and (2) extracellular volume fraction (log-rank 85). The combination of positive scores for both ECG and CMR yielded the highest prognostic value (log-rank 105). Multivariable analysis showed an association with outcomes for both the ECG prognosis score (log-rank 8.4, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.29 [1.09-1.54]) and the CMR prognosis score (log-rank 47, hazard ratio 1.90 [1.58-2.28]). An ECG prognosis score predicted outcomes independently of CMR. Combining the results of ECG and CMR using both prognosis scores improved the overall prognostic performance.

Comprehensive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Diastolic Dysfunction Grading Shows Very Good Agreement Compared With Echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to diastolic dysfunction (DD) grading and to evaluate the accuracy of CMR in the diagnosis of DD compared with echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Left ventricular DD is routinely assessed using echocardiography. METHODS: Consecutive clinically referred patients (n = 46; median age 59 years; interquartile range: 46 to 68 years; 33% women) underwent both conventional echocardiography and CMR. CMR diastolic transmitral velocities (E and A) and myocardial tissue velocity (e') were measured during breath-hold using a validated high-temporal resolution radial sector-wise golden-angle velocity-encoded sequence. CMR pulmonary artery pressure was estimated from 4-dimensional flow analysis of blood flow vortex duration in the pulmonary artery. CMR left atrial volume was measured using the biplane long-axis area-length method. Both CMR and echocardiographic data were used to perform blinded grading of DD according to the 2016 joint American and European recommendations. RESULTS: Grading of DD by CMR agreed with that by echocardiography in 43 of 46 cases (93%), of which 9% were normal, 2% indeterminate, 63% grade 1 DD, 4% grade 2 DD, and 15% grade 3 DD. There was a very good categorical agreement, with a weighted Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.857 (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.00; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive CMR protocol for grading DD encompassing diastolic blood and myocardial velocities, estimated pulmonary artery pressure, and left atrial volume showed very good agreement with echocardiography.

Lead one ratio in left bundle branch block predicts poor cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

BACKGROUND: A low electrocardiogram (ECG) lead one ratio (LOR) of the maximum positive/negative QRS amplitudes is associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and worse outcomes in left bundle branch block (LBBB); however, the impact of LOR on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes is unknown. We compared clinical outcomes and echocardiographic changes after CRT implantation by LOR. METHODS: Consecutive CRT-defibrillator recipients with LBBB implanted between 2006 and 2015 at Duke University Medical Center were included (N = 496). Time to heart transplant, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, or death was compared among patients with LOR <12 vs ≥12 using Cox-proportional hazard models. Changes in LVEF and LV volumes after CRT were compared by LOR. RESULTS: Baseline ECG LOR <12 was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.12-2.40, P = .01) for heart transplant, LVAD, or death. Patients with LOR <12 had less reduction of LV end diastolic volume (ΔLVEDV -4 ± 21 vs -13 ± 23%, P = .04) and LV end systolic volume (ΔLVESV -9 ± 27 vs -22 ± 26%, P = .03) after CRT. In patients with QRS duration (QRSd) ≥150 ms, LOR <12 was associated with an adjusted HR of 2.01 (95% CI 1.21-3.35, P = .008) for heart transplant, LVAD, or death, compared with LOR ≥12. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline ECG LOR <12 portends worse outcomes after CRT implantation in patients with LBBB, specifically among those with QRSd ≥150 ms. This ECG ratio may identify patients with a class I indication for CRT implantation at high risk for poor postimplantation outcomes.

The effect of levosimendan on survival and cardiac performance in an ischemic cardiac arrest model - A blinded randomized placebo-controlled study in swine.

BACKGROUND: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains poor. Levosimendan could be a new intervention in this setting. Therefore, we conducted a blinded, placebo controlled randomized study investigating the effects of levosimendan on survival and cardiac performance in an ischemic cardiac arrest model in swine. METHODS: Twenty-four anesthetised swines underwent experimentally-induced acute myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation. At the start of CPR, a bolus dose of levosimendan (12 µg kg-1) or placebo was given followed by a 24-h infusion (0.2 µg kg-1 min-1) after return of spontaneously circulation. Animals were evaluated by risk of death, post-resuscitation hemodynamics and infarction size by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) up to 32 h post arrest. RESULTS: Spontaneous circulation was restored in all (12/12) animals in the levosimendan group compared to two thirds (8/12) in the placebo group (P = 0.09). Protocol survival was higher for the levosimendan group (P = 0.02) with an estimated 88% lower risk of death compared to placebo (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.12 [0.01-0.96], P = 0.046). Cardiac output (CO) recovered 40% faster during the first hour of the intensive care period for the levosimendan group (difference 0.13 [0.01-0.26] L min-1P = 0.04). The placebo group required higher inotropic support during the intensive care period which masked an even bigger recovery in CO in the levosimendan group (58%). The MRI showed no difference in myocardial scar size or in myocardial area at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan given intra-arrest and during the first 24-h of post-resuscitation care improved survival and cardiac performance in this ischemic cardiac arrest model. Institutional Protocol Number; KERIC 5.2.18-14933.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D flow analysis has a higher diagnostic yield than Doppler echocardiography for detecting increased pulmonary artery pressure.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension is definitively diagnosed by the measurement of mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (mPAP) using right heart catheterization. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) four-dimensional (4D) flow analysis can estimate mPAP from blood flow vortex duration in the PA, with excellent results. Moreover, the peak systolic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) pressure gradient (TRPG) measured by Doppler echocardiography is commonly used in clinical routine to estimate systolic PA pressure. This study aimed to compare CMR and echocardiography with regards to quantitative and categorical agreement, and diagnostic yield for detecting increased PA pressure. METHODS: Consecutive clinically referred patients (n = 60, median [interquartile range] age 60 [48-68] years, 33% female) underwent echocardiography and CMR at 1.5 T (n = 43) or 3 T (n = 17). PA vortex duration was used to estimate mPAP using a commercially available time-resolved multiple 2D slice phase contrast three-directional velocity encoded sequence covering the main PA. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure TR and derive TRPG. Diagnostic yield was defined as the fraction of cases in which CMR or echocardiography detected an increased PA pressure, defined as vortex duration ≥15% of the cardiac cycle (mPAP ≥25 mmHg) or TR velocity > 2.8 m/s (TRPG > 31 mmHg). RESULTS: Both CMR and echocardiography showed normal PA pressure in 39/60 (65%) patients and increased PA pressure in 9/60 (15%) patients, overall agreement in 48/60 (80%) patients, kappa 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.27-0.71). CMR had a higher diagnostic yield for detecting increased PA pressure compared to echocardiography (21/60 (35%) vs 9/60 (15%), p < 0.001). In cases with both an observable PA vortex and measurable TR velocity (34/60, 56%), TRPG was correlated with mPAP (R2 = 0.65, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is good quantitative and fair categorical agreement between estimated mPAP from CMR and TRPG from echocardiography. CMR has higher diagnostic yield for detecting increased PA pressure compared to echocardiography, potentially due to a lower sensitivity of echocardiography in detecting increased PA pressure compared to CMR, related to limitations in the ability to adequately visualize and measure the TR jet by echocardiography. Future comparison between echocardiography, CMR and invasive measurements are justified to definitively confirm these findings.

The electrical determinants of increased wall thickness and mass in left ventricular hypertrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined as an increased left ventricular mass (LVM), can manifest as increased wall thickness, ventricular dilatation, or both. Existing LVH criteria from the electrocardiogram (ECG) have poor sensitivity. However, it is unknown whether changes in wall thickness and mass, respectively, can be separately detected by the ECG. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance and resting 12-lead ECG were included. Exclusion criteria were clinical confounders that might influence the ECG, including myocardial scar. Advanced ECG (A-ECG) analysis included conventional ECG measures and amplitudes, derived vectorcardiographic and polarcardiographic measures, and singular value decomposition of waveform complexity. A-ECG scores for 1) increased LVM index (LVMI), and 2) increased global wall thickness index (GTI) beyond the upper limit of normal in healthy volunteers, respectively, were derived using multivariable logistic regression. The area under the curve (AUC) and its bootstrapped confidence interval (CI) for each score were compared to those of conventional ECG-LVH criteria including Cornell voltage, Cornell product, and Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria. RESULTS: Out of 485 patients (median [interquartile range] age 51 [38-61] years, 54% female), 51 (11%) had increased LVMI and 65 (13%) had increased GTI. The A-ECG scores for increased LVMI (AUC [95% CI] 0.84 [0.78-0.90]), and increased GTI (0.80 [0.74-0.85]) differed, and had a higher AUC than the conventional ECG-LVH criteria (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Increased LVMI differed from increased GTI in its electrocardiographic manifestation by A-ECG. New A-ECG scores outperform conventional ECG criteria for LVH in determining increased LVMI and GTI, respectively.

Supine, prone, right and left gravitational effects on human pulmonary circulation.

BACKGROUND: Body position can be optimized for pulmonary ventilation/perfusion matching during surgery and intensive care. However, positional effects upon distribution of pulmonary blood flow and vascular distensibility measured as the pulmonary blood volume variation have not been quantitatively characterized. In order to explore the potential clinical utility of body position as a modulator of pulmonary hemodynamics, we aimed to characterize gravitational effects upon distribution of pulmonary blood flow, pulmonary vascular distension, and pulmonary vascular distensibility. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n = 10) underwent phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulmonary artery and vein flow measurements in the supine, prone, and right/left lateral decubitus positions. For each lung, blood volume variation was calculated by subtracting venous from arterial flow per time frame. RESULTS: Body position did not change cardiac output (p = 0.84). There was no difference in blood flow between the superior and inferior pulmonary veins in the supine (p = 0.92) or prone body positions (p = 0.43). Compared to supine, pulmonary blood flow increased to the dependent lung in the lateral positions (16-33%, p = 0.002 for both). Venous but not arterial cross-sectional vessel area increased in both lungs when dependent compared to when non-dependent in the lateral positions (22-27%, p ≤ 0.01 for both). In contrast, compared to supine, distensibility increased in the non-dependent lung in the lateral positions (68-113%, p = 0.002 for both). CONCLUSIONS: CMR demonstrates that in the lateral position, there is a shift in blood flow distribution, and venous but not arterial blood volume, from the non-dependent to the dependent lung. The non-dependent lung has a sizable pulmonary vascular distensibility reserve, possibly related to left atrial pressure. These results support the physiological basis for positioning patients with unilateral pulmonary pathology with the "good lung down" in the context of intensive care. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the diagnostic potential of these physiological insights into pulmonary hemodynamics, particularly in the context of non-invasively characterizing pulmonary hypertension.

Low lead one ratio predicts clinical outcomes in left bundle branch block.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the association between a novel electrocardiographic (ECG) marker of late, rightward electrocardiographic forces (termed the lead one ratio [LOR]), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial scar, and clinical outcomes in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). METHODS AND RESULTS: LOR was calculated in patients with LBBB from a derivation cohort (n = 240) and receiver operator characteristic curves identified optimal threshold values for predicting myocardial scar and LVEF less than 35%. An independent validation cohort of patients with LBBB (n = 196) was used to test the association of LOR with the myocardial scar, LVEF, and the likelihood of death, heart transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The optimal thresholds in the derivation cohort were LOR less than 13.7 for identification of scar (sensitivity 55%, specificity 80%), and LOR less than 12.1 for LVEF less than 35% (sensitivity 49%, specificity 80%). In the validation cohort, LOR less than 13.7 was not associated with scar size or presence (P > 0.05 for both). LOR less than 12.1 was associated with lower LVEF (30 [20-40] versus 40 [25-55]%; P = 0.002) and predicted LVEF less than 35% in univariable (odds ratio [OR], 2.2 [1.2-4.1]; P = 0.01) and multivariable analysis (OR, 2.2 [1.2-4.3]; P = 0.02). LOR less than 12.1 was associated with scar presence when patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were excluded (OR = 7.2 [1.5-33.2]; P = 0.002). LOR less than 12.1 had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.53 ([1.05-2.21]; P = 0.03) for death, transplant or LVAD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ECG LOR less than 12.1 predicts reduced-LV systolic function and poorer prognosis in patients with LBBB.

Ejection fraction in left bundle branch block is disproportionately reduced in relation to amount of myocardial scar.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and LV myocardial scar can identify potentially reversible causes of LV dysfunction. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) alters the electrical and mechanical activation of the LV. We hypothesized that the relationship between LVEF and scar extent is different in LBBB compared to controls. METHODS: We compared the relationship between LVEF and scar burden between patients with LBBB and scar (n = 83), and patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and scar but no electrocardiographic conduction abnormality (controls, n = 90), who had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at one of three centers. LVEF (%) was measured in CMR cine images. Scar burden was quantified by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and expressed as % of LV mass (%LVM). Maximum possible LVEF (LVEFmax) was defined as the function describing the hypotenuse in the LVEF versus myocardial scar extent scatter plot. Dysfunction index was defined as LVEFmax derived from the control cohort minus the measured LVEF. RESULTS: Compared to controls with scar, LBBB with scar had a lower LVEF (median [interquartile range] 27 [19-38] vs 36 [25-50] %, p < 0.001), smaller scar (4 [1-9] vs 11 [6-20] %LVM, p < 0.001), and greater dysfunction index (39 [30-52] vs 21 [12-35] % points, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among LBBB patients referred for CMR, LVEF is disproportionately reduced in relation to the amount of scar. Dyssynchrony in LBBB may thus impair compensation for loss of contractile myocardium.

The ability of the electrocardiogram in left bundle branch block to detect myocardial scar determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

AIMS: We aimed to improve the electrocardiographic 2009 left bundle branch block (LBBB) Selvester QRS score (2009 LBSS) for scar assessment. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 325 LBBB patients with available ECG and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement from four centers (142 [44%] with CMR scar). Forty-four semi-automatically measured ECG variables pre-selected based on the 2009 LBSS yielded one multivariable model for scar detection and another for scar quantification. RESULTS: The 2009 LBSS achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.66) for scar detection, and R2 = 0.04, p < 0.001, for scar quantification. Multivariable modeling improved scar detection to AUC 0.72 (0.66-0.77) and scar quantification to R2 = 0.21, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The 2009 LBSS detects and quantifies myocardial scar with poor accuracy. Improved models with extensive comparison of ECG and CMR had modest performance, indicating limited room for improvement of the 2009 LBSS.

Evaluation of the ECG based Selvester scoring method to estimate myocardial scar burden and predict clinical outcome in patients with left bundle branch block, with comparison to late gadolinium enhancement CMR imaging.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial scar burden quantification is an emerging clinical parameter for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death and prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. We investigated the relationships among semiautomated Selvester score burden and late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) assessed scar burden and clinical outcome in patients with underlying heart failure, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment. METHODS: Selvester QRS scoring was performed on all subjects with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy at Skåne University Hospital Lund (2002-2013) who had undergone LGE-CMR and 12-lead ECG with strict LBBB pre-ICD implantation. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included; 57% nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and 43% ischemic cardiomyopathy with mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 27.6% ± 11.7. All patients had scar by Selvester scoring. Sixty-two percent had scar by LGE-CMR (n = 37). The Spearman correlation coefficient for LGE-CMR and Selvester score derived scar was r = .35 (p = .007). In scar negative LGE-CMR, there was evidence of scar by Selvester scoring in all patients (range 3%-33%, median 15%). Fourteen patients (23%) had an event during the follow-up period; 11 (18%) deaths and six adequate therapies (10%). There was a moderate trend indicating that presence of scar increased the risk of clinical endpoints in the LGE-CMR analysis (p = .045). CONCLUSION: There is a modest correlation between LGE-CMR and Selvester scoring verified myocardial scar. CMR based scar burden is correlated to clinical outcome, but Selvester scoring is not. The Selvester scoring algorithm needs to be further refined in order to be clinically relevant and reliable for detailed scar evaluation in patients with LBBB.

Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Reduces Electrocardiographic Voltage Measures of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Independent of Left Ventricular Mass.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis quantified by myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and left ventricular mass (LVM) index (LVMI) measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance might represent independent and opposing contributors to ECG voltage measures of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Diffuse myocardial fibrosis can occur in LVH and interfere with ECG voltage measures. This phenomenon could explain the decreased sensitivity of LVH detectable by ECG, a fundamental diagnostic tool in cardiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 77 patients (median age, 53 [interquartile range, 26-60] years; 49% female) referred for contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance with ECV measures and 12-lead ECG. Exclusion criteria included clinical confounders that might influence ECG measures of LVH. We evaluated ECG voltage-based LVH measures, including Sokolow-Lyon index, Cornell voltage, 12-lead voltage, and the vectorcardiogram spatial QRS voltage, with respect to LVMI and ECV. ECV and LVMI were not correlated (R2=0.02; P=0.25). For all voltage-related parameters, higher LVMI resulted in greater voltage (r=0.33-0.49; P<0.05 for all), whereas increased ECV resulted in lower voltage (r=-0.32 to -0.57; P<0.05 for all). When accounting for body fat, LV end-diastolic volume, and mass-to-volume ratio, both LVMI (ß=0.58, P=0.03) and ECV (ß=-0.46, P<0.001) were independent predictors of QRS voltage (multivariate adjusted R2=0.39; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial mass and diffuse myocardial fibrosis have independent and opposing effects upon ECG voltage measures of LVH. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis quantified by ECV can obscure the ECG manifestations of increased LVM. This provides mechanistic insight, which can explain the limited sensitivity of the ECG for detecting increased LVM.

Automatic QRS Selvester scoring system in patients with left bundle branch block.

AIMS: The Selvester QRS scoring system uses quantitative criteria from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to estimate the myocardial scar size of patients, including those with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Automation of the scoring system could facilitate the clinical use of this technique which requires a set of multiple QRS patterns to be identified and measured. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a series of algorithms to automatically detect and measure the QRS parameters required for Selvester scoring. The 'QUantitative and Automatic REport of Selvester Score' was designed specifically for the analysis of ECGs from patients meeting new strict criteria for complete LBBB. The algorithms were designed using a training (n = 36) and a validation (n = 180) set of ECGs, consisting of signal-averaged 12-lead ECGs (1000 Hz sampling) recorded from 216 LBBB patients from the MADIT-CRT. We assessed the performance of the methods using expert manually adjudicated ECGs. The average of absolute differences between automatic and adjudicated Selvester scoring was 1.2 ± 1.5 points. The range of average differences for continuous measurements of wave locations and interval durations varied between 0 and 6 ms. Erroneous detection of Q, R, S, R', and S' waves (oversensed or missed) were 3, 1, 1, 16, and 6%, respectively. Seven percent of notches detected in the first 40 ms were misdetected. CONCLUSION: We propose an efficient computerized method for the automatic measurement of the Selvester score in patients with the strict LBBB.

Specificity for each of the 46 criteria of the Selvester QRS score for electrocardiographic myocardial scar sizing in left bundle branch block.

BACKGROUND: The Selvester QRS score consists of a set of electrocardiographic criteria designed to identify, quantify and localize scar in the left ventricle using the morphology of the QRS complex. These criteria were updated in 2009 to expand their use to patients with underlying conduction abnormalities, but these versions have thus far only been validated in small and carefully selected populations. AIM: To determine the specificity for each of the criteria of the left bundle branch block (LBBB) modified Selvester QRS Score (LB-SS) in a population with strict LBBB and no myocardial scar as verified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (CMR-LGE). METHODS: We identified ninety-nine patients with LBBB without scar on CMR-LGE, who underwent a clinically indicated CMR scan at three different centers. The ECG recording date was any time prior to or <30days after the CMR scan. The LB-SS was applied and specificity for detection of scar in each of the 46 separate criteria was determined. RESULTS: The specificity ranged between 41% and 100% for the 46 criteria of LB-SS and 27/46 (59%) met ≥95% specificity. The mean±SD specificity was 90%±14%. CONCLUSION: Several of the criteria in the LB-SS lack adequate specificity. Elimination or modification of these nonspecific QRS morphology criteria may improve the specificity of the overall LB-SS.