In Vivo Biofilm Formation on Novel PEEK, Titanium, and Zirconia Implant Abutment Materials.

The formation of biofilms on the surface of dental implants and abutment materials may lead to peri-implantitis and subsequent implant failure. Recently, innovative materials such as polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and its modifications have been used as abutment materials. However, there is limited knowledge on microbial adhesion to PEEK materials. The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate biofilm formation on the surface of conventional (titanium and zirconia) and PEEK implant abutment materials. Split specimens of titanium, zirconia, PEEK, and modified PEEK (PEEK-BioHPP) were manufactured, mounted in individual removable acrylic upper jaw splints, and worn by 20 healthy volunteers for 24 h. The surface roughness was determined using widefield confocal microscopy. Biofilm accumulation was investigated by fluorescence microscopy and quantified by imaging software. The surface roughness of the investigated materials was <0.2 µm and showed no significant differences between the materials. Zirconia showed the lowest biofilm formation, followed by titanium, PEEK, and PEEK-BioHPP. Differences were significant (p < 0.001) between the investigated materials, except for the polyether-ether-ketones. Generally, biofilm formation was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the posterior region of the oral cavity than in the anterior region. The results of the present study show a material-dependent susceptibility to biofilm formation. The risk of developing peri-implantitis may be reduced by a specific choice of abutment material.

Time of day-dependent deviations in dynamic and static occlusion: A prospective clinical study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The registration of dental occlusion is essential for prosthodontic treatment. However, studies on time-dependent changes of static and dynamic occlusion that may affect definitive restorations are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to use conventional and digital occlusal registration techniques to evaluate time-dependent fluctuations in static and dynamic occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The static and dynamic occlusion of 19 healthy individuals (14 women and 5 men with a mean ±standard deviation age of 30.8 ±4.8 years) was examined 3 times a day using occlusal foil (12-µm occlusion foil) and a digital sensor (T-Scan III). The procedure was repeated after 14 days. The statistical analysis covered all registrations referencing the first measurement point to assess occurring differences, and changes per tooth and arch were determined (α=.05). Potential influencing factors were calculated by using mixed logistic regression. Marginal probabilities were calculated considering the registration technique and the time of measurement. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between registered occlusal patterns and the different registration techniques. Occlusal changes per maxillary dental arch were observed with static foil registration (P<.001; 98.8%), left laterotrusion foil registration (P=.001; 29.6%), right laterotrusion foil registration (P=.001; 29.6%), static sensor registration (P<.001; 20.3%), left laterotrusion sensor registration (P=.001; 71.7%), and right laterotrusion sensor registration (P=.005; 67.7%). None of the techniques showed higher probabilities of occlusal changes at a given time of day with respect to time-dependent changes. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that occlusion cannot be considered constant and that the topography and intensity of the contact points vary. Circadian occlusion variance can be assumed without preferring a specific time of the day. This differentiated view of occlusion as a changing system helps to clarify the challenge of dental restorations for both the patient and the practitioner.

Monomer Release from Dental Resins: The Current Status on Study Setup, Detection and Quantification for In Vitro Testing.

Improvements in mechanical properties and a shift of focus towards esthetic dentistry led to the application of dental resins in various areas of dentistry. However, dental resins are not inert in the oral environment and may release monomers and other substances such as Bisphenol-A (BPA) due to incomplete polymerization and intraoral degradation. Current research shows that various monomers present cytotoxic, genotoxic, proinflammatory, and even mutagenic effects. Of these eluting substances, the elution of BPA in the oral environment is of particular interest due to its role as an endocrine disruptor. For this reason, the release of residual monomers and especially BPA from dental resins has been a cause for public concern. The assessment of patient exposure and potential health risks of dental monomers require a reliable experimental and analytical setup. However, the heterogeneous study design applied in current research hinders biocompatibility testing by impeding comparative analysis of different studies and transfer to the clinical situation. Therefore, this review aims to provide information on each step of a robust experimental and analytical in vitro setup that allows the collection of clinically relevant data and future meta-analytical evaluations.

A comparative in vitro study on monomer release from bisphenol A-free and conventional temporary crown and bridge materials.

This study aimed to investigate the release of common monomers from two conventional and two bisphenol A (BPA)-free temporary crown and bridge materials. Cylindrical samples of all materials were prepared (N = 90; five samples for each material and cycle of analysis). All samples were immersed in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water and incubated for 1 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 7 days in an incubation shaker at 37°C and 112 rpm. Extraction was performed in accordance with ISO 10993-12. Eluted monomers were detected and quantified by HPLC coupled with ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (HPLC-UV/Vis-MS). Analysis of BPA was performed by HPLC coupled with ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (HPLC-UV/Vis) and positive results were verified by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Neither bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) nor BPA was quantifiable in any of the crown and bridge samples investigated in the present study. However, all samples contained triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and/or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) after 24 h of incubation. Statistical analysis showed that significantly more UDMA was released from the BPA-free materials than from the conventional materials. All concentrations of UDMA measured were below the effective cytotoxic concentrations previously reported. However, for a few materials, especially BPA-free temporary crown and bridge materials, the levels of UDMA were above previously reported potentially harmful concentrations for local cells. As BPA-free materials were introduced as being more biocompatible than materials containing BPA, substitution of Bis-GMA with UDMA should be further investigated.