Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Aust Vet J ; 101(4): 164-173, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690594

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of disposable plastics and their subsequent environmental impacts are topics of increasing concern in modern society. Medical, including veterinary, sectors are major contributors to plastic waste production. While there is an existing body of literature on the use and reduction of disposable plastics in the human medical sector, few studies, if any, have specifically investigated the use of plastics within the veterinary field. The overall aim of this pilot study was to investigate Australian veterinarians regarding their attitudes toward the ways in which they use disposable plastic in their work and personal lives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven veterinarians were interviewed, representing a range of demographics and professional backgrounds from multiple states. Thematic qualitative analysis was employed to organise the data into several major themes encompassing many smaller nodes. RESULTS: The dataset revealed that most, if not all, veterinarians interviewed agree that disposable plastic is used in excess in veterinary medicine, but that veterinarians will never be able to avoid using plastic entirely. Participants supplied differing opinions with respect to the best strategies for reducing plastic waste production within the veterinary field, including recycling, replacing disposable items or improving education. DISCUSSION: Despite different participants suggesting conflicting ideas, most, if not all, of the ideas presented have support in the scientific literature. This supports a hybrid approach involving refining recycling systems, reducing plastic consumption and improving education on plastic waste production. A hybrid top-down-bottom-up approach must include encouraging cooperation among stakeholders, both within and outside the veterinary sector, as this will be a major contributor to progress. In a broader context, this hybrid approach to inciting change at all levels of the veterinary sector will require engagement from many interdependent entities; as such, this study should act as a starting point for an ongoing process of cooperative change. Recommendations for future research include life cycle analyses of reusable versus disposable veterinary materials; exploring ways to expand sustainability education within and beyond the veterinary sector, and examining methods of improving technology and infrastructure.


Subject(s)
Plastics , Veterinarians , Humans , Animals , Pilot Projects , Australia
2.
Aust Vet J ; 101(4): 133-141, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655500

ABSTRACT

Brucella suis is an emerging, zoonotic disease predominantly affecting dogs and humans that engage in feral pig hunting in Australia and other countries. Although B. suis infection in dogs shares some clinical similarities to the host-adapted species (B. canis), B. suis remains an incompletely understood pathogen in dogs with limited published data on its pathogenesis and clinical features. This case series describes the presentations, diagnosis, and clinical management of B. suis infection in three dogs: (1) a bitch with dystocia, abortion and mastitis; (2) an entire male dog with septic arthritis and presumptive osteomyelitis; and (3) a castrated male dog with lymphadenitis. Unique features of these cases are reported including the first documented detection of B. suis from milk and isolation from lymph nodes of canine patients, as well as the follow-up of pups born to a B. suis-infected bitch. Consistent with previous reports, all three dogs showed a favourable clinical response to combination antibiotic therapy with rifampicin and doxycycline. Individually tailored drug regimens were required based on the clinical presentation and other factors, including owner expectations and compliance with therapy as well as a zoonotic risk assessment (generally considered low, except around time of whelping). The authors include their recommendations for the clinical management of dogs that are at-risk or seropositive for B. suis with or without clinical signs or laboratory-confirmed infection.


Subject(s)
Brucella suis , Brucellosis , Dog Diseases , Swine Diseases , Swine , Pregnancy , Female , Animals , Dogs , Humans , Male , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/drug therapy , Brucellosis/veterinary , Abortion, Veterinary , Rifampin/therapeutic use , Animals, Wild , Sus scrofa , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/drug therapy
3.
Aust Vet J ; 100(7): 296-305, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35582949

ABSTRACT

The largest Australian farm-based outbreak of Q fever originated from a dairy goat herd. We surveyed commercial dairy goat farms across Australia by testing bulk tank milk (BTM) samples using a commercial indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and two quantitative polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Of the 66 commercial dairy goat herds on record, managers from 61 herds were contacted and 49 provided BTM samples. Five of the surveyed herds were positive on at least one of the diagnostic tests, thus herd-level apparent prevalence was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4 to 22). True prevalence was estimated to be 3% (95% credible interval: 0 to 18). Herd managers completed a questionnaire on herd management, biosecurity and hygiene practices and risk factors were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Herds with >900 milking does (the upper quartile) were more likely to be Coxiella burnetii positive (odds ratio = 6.75; 95% CI 1.65 to 27.7) compared with farms with ≤900 milking does. The odds of BTM positivity increased by a factor of 2.53 (95% CI 1.51 to 4.22) for each order of magnitude increase in the number of goats per acre. C. burnetii was not detected in samples from the majority of the Australian dairy goat herds suggesting there is an opportunity to protect the industry and contain this disease with strengthened biosecurity practices. Intensification appeared associated with an increased risk of positivity. Further investigation is required to discriminate the practices associated with an increased risk of introduction to disease-free herds, from practices associated with maintenance of C. burnetii infection in infected dairy goat herds.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Coxiella burnetii , Goat Diseases , Animals , Australia/epidemiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dairying , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Farms , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Goats , Milk , Prevalence , Risk Factors
4.
Aust Vet J ; 99(9): 412-418, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34151419

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate veterinarians' and horse owners' perceptions towards the use of Hendra virus (HeV) antibody titre testing and how it influences veterinary advice. METHODS: Six semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with veterinarians who have submitted samples for HeV antibody titre testing. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed to identify and report common themes within the data. RESULTS: Veterinarians are predominantly using the titre tests as an alternative to vaccination due to clients' fear of vaccine reactions. The high cost of titre testing, the difficulty interpreting titre results and a lack of titre test recognition by authorities were the major barriers reported to using this test. Some veterinarians detailed difficulties communicating titre test procedures and results to their clients. The majority of veterinarians accepted titres of 64 or greater as evidence of protective immunity and would rely on those results for 12 months. However, there was discrepancy of these values and the level of confidence veterinarians had in interpreting the results of HeV antibody titre tests varied. CONCLUSION: This study has provided an overview of the attitudes of horse owners and veterinarians towards HeV antibody titre testing. Although evidence for HeV vaccination titres as an indication of protective immunity is still inadequate, it will assist veterinarians in interpreting and communicating titre results.


Subject(s)
Hendra Virus , Henipavirus Infections , Horse Diseases , Vaccines , Veterinarians , Animals , Henipavirus Infections/prevention & control , Henipavirus Infections/veterinary , Horse Diseases/prevention & control , Horses , Perception
5.
BMC Vet Res ; 16(1): 157, 2020 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32448348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological investigations were carried out following detection of an outbreak of megaoesophagus in Victorian Police working dogs in early 2018 and an increase in the number of canine megaoesophagus cases reported by companion animal veterinarians in Eastern Australia starting in late 2017. VetCompass Australia data were used to quantify the incidence of canine megaoesophagus for the period January 2012 to February 2018 and a matched case-control study carried out to identify individual animal risk factors for canine megaoesophagus in 2017-2018. RESULTS: There was a 7-fold increase in the incidence rate of canine megaoesophagus from 2014 (0.11 [95% CI 0.02 to 0.58] cases per 100,000 dogs per day) to 2018 (0.82 [95% CI 0.19 to 4.2] cases per 100,000 dogs per day). Since 2013, the incidence of megaoesophagus in Australia has shown a seasonal pattern, with greater numbers of cases diagnosed during the warmer months of the year. In the case-control study, use of Mars Petcare Advance Dermocare as a source of food was 325 (95% CI 64 to 1644) times greater for cases, compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses provide evidence that the feeding of Advance Dermocare was responsible for the majority of cases in the outbreak of megaoesophagus in Eastern Australia in 2017-2018. The increase in the incidence rate of megaoesophagus in Australia since 2014-2015 warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/adverse effects , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Esophageal Achalasia/veterinary , Animals , Australia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Dog Diseases/etiology , Dogs , Esophageal Achalasia/epidemiology , Esophageal Achalasia/etiology , Female , Incidence , Male , Risk Factors , Seasons
6.
Aust Vet J ; 97(7): 220-224, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236928

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature of serological responses in Australian horses using a commercial duplex indirect ELISA (iELISA) following vaccination against strangles. DESIGN: A group (n = 19) of client-owned horses from five properties were recruited to receive a primary course of a Streptococcus equi subsp. equi (S. equi) extract vaccine. Serological responses were determined by duplex iELISA incorporating S. equi-specific fragments of two cell wall proteins, SEQ2190 and SeM (antigens (Ag) A and C, respectively). METHODS: The horses were administered a primary strangles vaccination course. Blood was collected immediately prior to each of the three vaccinations at 2-week intervals and additionally at 28 and 56 days following the 3rd vaccination (V3). RESULTS: Significant increases in mean antibody levels of horses following vaccination were limited only to AgC, which was significantly increased at T2/V3, 14 days following V2 (ratio of geometric means = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6, 8.4; P = 0.003). There was no increase in mean antibody to Ag A (ratio of geometric means = 1.4; 95% CI: 0.6, 3.2; P = 0.39). Four horses (22%) exceeded the test cut-off for AgC following vaccination. CONCLUSION: Vaccination of Australian horses is unlikely to interfere greatly with detection of strangles using the duplex iELISA. No responses would be anticipated to AgA following vaccination with Equivac© S/Equivac© 2in1 and only a minority are likely to respond to AgC. We conclude that the results of this study validate the usefulness of the duplex iELISA to assist control measures for strangles outbreaks in Australian horse populations.


Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Horse Diseases/prevention & control , Streptococcal Infections/veterinary , Streptococcus equi , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Australia , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , Horse Diseases/blood , Horses , Male , Streptococcal Infections/blood , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination/veterinary
7.
Epidemiol Infect ; 147: e150, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30869062

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica serovar Wangata (S. Wangata) is an important cause of endemic salmonellosis in Australia, with human infections occurring from undefined sources. This investigation sought to examine possible environmental and zoonotic sources for human infections with S. Wangata in north-eastern New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The investigation adopted a One Health approach and was comprised of three complimentary components: a case-control study examining human risk factors; environmental and animal sampling; and genomic analysis of human, animal and environmental isolates. Forty-eight human S. Wangata cases were interviewed during a 6-month period from November 2016 to April 2017, together with 55 Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) controls and 130 neighbourhood controls. Indirect contact with bats/flying foxes (S. Typhimurium controls (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-6.48)) (neighbourhood controls (aOR 8.33, 95% CI 2.58-26.83)), wild frogs (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.32-10.07) and wild birds (aOR 6.93, 95% CI 2.29-21.00) were statistically associated with illness in multivariable analyses. S. Wangata was detected in dog faeces, wildlife scats and a compost specimen collected from the outdoor environments of cases' residences. In addition, S. Wangata was detected in the faeces of wild birds and sea turtles in the investigation area. Genomic analysis revealed that S. Wangata isolates were relatively clonal. Our findings suggest that S. Wangata is present in the environment and may have a reservoir in wildlife populations in north-eastern NSW. Further investigation is required to better understand the occurrence of Salmonella in wildlife groups and to identify possible transmission pathways for human infections.


Subject(s)
One Health , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/transmission , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/transmission , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Animals, Domestic/microbiology , Animals, Wild/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Environmental Microbiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Serogroup , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...