Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Midwifery ; 117: 103564, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of using an innovative decision aid, MyBirthplace, to facilitate shared decision-making regarding place of birth. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study comparing pre-test and post-test responses from participants who had access to the intervention. SETTING: A large urban hospital in the south of England. PARTICIPANTS: All pregnant women who accessed maternity care between April and December 2016. INTERVENTION: A decision aid (MyBirthplace) designed to provide information and support regarding place of birth. The digital tool (available in both an app and web-based version) was used to facilitate discuss between the women and her midwife at the booking visit. MEASUREMENTS: Women's stage of decision making as measured by the Stage of Decision Making Scale. A questionnaire was administered before and after using MyBirthplace at booking, and again at 28 weeks gestation. FINDINGS: Nearly half the women (42.1%) had already decided where they wanted to give birth before the booking appointment, but a third (34.3%) had not yet begun to think about their choices. The introduction of the decision aid during the booking visit was associated with a significant increase in the stage of decision making suggesting that women had greater certainty in their decision P< 0.0001 [SD 1.077]. Women who accessed MyBirthplace had lower decisional conflict after the booking appointment than those women that did not access the decision aid (35.5% compared with 22.0%) but this difference was not statistically significant. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Decision aids, as a standard part of practice, have the potential to ensure women are informed of their options and encourage shared decision making about place of birth. Women were more confident with their decision following the booking appointment and by 28 weeks; however, further research is needed to identify the role that the decision aid played in building this confidence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The introduction of a decision aid, Mybirthplace, within the hospital impacted early discussions between the woman and the midwife and appeared to benefit women's decision making regarding place of birth. Further studies of midwives' use of innovative technologies and their implementation are required.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Midwifery , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Decision Making , Parturition , Decision Making, Shared
2.
J Innov Health Inform ; 25(1): 1-6, 2018 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29717948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recent Maternity Review for England highlighted the need for more choice for women with more accessible information to support decisions. This study assesses the effect of an unique Decision Support Tool (DST) called MyBirthplace on decision making and information gathering behaviours of pregnant women regarding birth place choice. The study seeks to understand women's views and opinions about using the DST and their feelings about how well the DST supports them to make a decision. METHODS: A mixed method sequential exploratory design will be utilised to meet the above aim. This three phase study will involve a proposed sample of 169 women from a large maternity hospital in the United Kingdom. Phase one will be a questionnaire survey with women pre and post access to the DST, which is given to them by their midwife at the initial appointment. The questionnaire will look at baseline data, knowledge level and decision making using the Stages of Decision making scale (SDMS). A follow up questionnaire at 28 weeks (phase 2) will review the SDMS to enable the usefulness of Mybirthplace to be evaluated and to seek women's opinion on various aspects of MyBirthplace. The proposed sample size was determined by a power calculation based on changes attributed to the DST as measured by the SDMS. Phase three involves qualitative interviews with a minimum of 10 purposely chosen women at approximately 36 weeks gestation, and is followed by collating data on where the women actually give birth.   DISCUSSION: This study is the first study to assess the effect of a DST in supporting women's choice of place of birth. It will add to current DST literature. It is also one of very few studies to utilise the stages of decision making scale with DST in pregnancy and thus will build on the existing literature; whilst broaching key concepts highlighted in the National Maternity Review.


Subject(s)
Birthing Centers , Choice Behavior , Decision Making , Decision Support Techniques , Information Seeking Behavior , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitals, Maternity , Humans , Parturition , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...