Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Radiol Case Rep ; 18(1): 1-7, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910588

ABSTRACT

This case report discusses a diagnosis of uterine torsion in an 84-year-old woman who presented with five days of right lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and poor intake. Computed tomography (CT) imaging demonstrated a whorled configuration at the junction of the cervix and lower uterine segment, with the left gonadal vein crossing midline, and two previously known right leiomyomas now appearing on the left. These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of uterine torsion. She then underwent an urgent exploratory laparotomy, and the uterus was found to be dextroverted 270 degrees, with dark mottled purple tissue and engorged vessels. A supracervical hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy were performed. Final pathology demonstrated extensive necrosis. This case reviews the classic presentation and imaging findings for the rare diagnosis of uterine torsion and options for management of both non-gravid and gravid patients.


Subject(s)
Leiomyoma , Postmenopause , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Torsion Abnormality , Uterine Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Leiomyoma/surgery , Leiomyoma/diagnostic imaging , Leiomyoma/complications , Leiomyoma/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Torsion Abnormality/diagnostic imaging , Torsion Abnormality/surgery , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Diseases/surgery , Uterine Diseases/pathology , Hysterectomy , Diagnosis, Differential
2.
MedEdPORTAL ; 18: 11275, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36310568

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Reproductive injustices such as forced sterilization, preventable maternal morbidity and mortality, restricted access to family planning services, and policy-driven environmental violence undermine reproductive autonomy and health outcomes, with disproportionate impact on historically marginalized communities. However, curricula focused on reproductive justice (RJ) are lacking in medical education. Methods: We designed a novel, interactive, case-based RJ curriculum for postclerkship medical students. This curriculum was created using published guidelines on best practices for incorporating RJ in medical education. The session included a prerecorded video on the history of RJ, an article, and four interactive cases. Students engaged in a 2-hour small-group session, discussing key learning points of each case. We evaluated the curriculum's impact with a pre- and postsurvey and focus group. Results: Sixty-eight students participated in this RJ curriculum in October 2020 and March 2021. Forty-one percent of them completed the presurvey, and 46% completed the postsurvey. Twenty-two percent completed both surveys. Ninety percent of respondents agreed that RJ was relevant to their future practice, and 87% agreed that participating in this session would impact their clinical practice. Most respondents (81%) agreed that more RJ content is needed. Focus group participants appreciated the case-based, interactive format and the intersectionality within the cases. Discussion: This interactive curriculum is an innovative and effective way to teach medical students about RJ and its relevance to clinical practice. Walking alongside patients as they accessed reproductive health care in a case-based curriculum improved students' comfort and self-reported knowledge on several RJ topics.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical , Students, Medical , Humans , Social Justice , Curriculum , Sex Education
4.
Am J Bioeth ; 15(9): 4-17, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26305741

ABSTRACT

We conducted focus groups to assess patient attitudes toward research on medical practices in the context of usual care. We found that patients focus on the implications of this research for their relationship with and trust in their physicians. Patients view research on medical practices as separate from usual care, demanding dissemination of information and in most cases, individual consent. Patients expect information about this research to come through their physician, whom they rely on to identify and filter associated risks. In general, patients support this research, but worry that participation in research involving randomization may undermine individualized care that acknowledges their unique medical histories. These findings suggest the need for public education on variation in practice among physicians and the need for a collaborative approach to the governance of research on medical practices that addresses core values of trust, transparency, and partnership.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Informed Consent , Learning , Patient Participation , Personal Autonomy , Physician-Patient Relations , Precision Medicine , Random Allocation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ethics , Trust , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Cooperative Behavior , Ethics, Research , Focus Groups , Humans , Information Dissemination , Informed Consent/ethics , Medical Records , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Precision Medicine/ethics , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...