Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 27(5): 244-249, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32461034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Insulin therapy is essential for type 1 diabetes. While a reasonable glycemic control prevents complications, inadvertent intramuscular (IM) insulin injection results in hypoglycemia and fluctuations of blood glucose levels. OBJECTIVE: To assess the subcutaneous thickness (SCt) at the potential insulin injection sites, in order to determine the suitable needle length. METHODS: Diabetic and non-diabetic children (n=125; aged 2-14 years) attending a tertiary care hospital were examined, after excluding those who had skin abnormality at the injection site, were hospitalized for>3 days, or had any other chronic illnesses. Dermal thickness (Dt) and SCt at the potential insulin injection sites were measured with ultrasonography. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 8 years and 57% were boys; mean Dt was 2.1±0.4 mm, SCt was 7.45.6±3.7 mm, and maximum SCt was 29.8 mm in the anterior abdominal wall. SCt increased with age and by raising a skin fold (sf). There was no difference (P>0.05) in Dt between genders, and limbs showed thinner Dt values than the abdomen. SCt changed with the injection site: it was the lowest in the thigh and the highest in the abdomen. SCt was thicker in females, with or without sf (P<0.001). For all sites, IM risk was high for 15-mm needles: it was highest in the thighs (98%) and reduced to 86% with sf. IM risk was low for 5-mm needles: it was highest in the thigh (38%), and reduced to 12% with sf. Compared with girls (up to 42%), IM risk was higher for boys (up to 54%), even for 5-mm needles with a sf. CONCLUSION: Using a short needle is recommended for children, particularly for boys. Regardless of the needle length, the raised sf technique is associated with reduced IM risk.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Muscle, Skeletal/anatomy & histology , Needles , Skin/anatomy & histology , Subcutaneous Tissue/anatomy & histology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Injections, Intramuscular , Injections, Subcutaneous , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Skin/diagnostic imaging , Sri Lanka , Subcutaneous Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
2.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ; 18(1): 6, 2017 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28110639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Amitraz is a pesticide used worldwide on animals and in agriculture. It contains triazapentadiene, which is a centrally acting alpha-2 adrenergic agonist. Amitraz poisoning is fairly uncommon in humans and occurs via oral, dermal or inhalational routes. Only a limited number of case reports of human intoxication have been published and most of them are of accidental ingestion by children. CASE PRESENTATION: A twenty-year-old Sri Lankan female presented following self-ingestion of 20 ml of amitraz resulting in 37.8 mg/ kg of amitraz poisoning. She lost consciousness after 20 min of ingestion, developed bradycardia and hypotension, which needed intravenous fluid resuscitation and dobutamine. Gastric lavage was performed. Her bradycardia persisted for 36 h and she was drowsy for 48 h. She did not develop respiratory depression, convulsions or hypothermia and the urine output was normal. Arterial blood gas revealed mild respiratory alkalosis. She recovered fully within 48 h and was discharged on day 3. CONCLUSION: The clinical manifestations of amitraz (impaired consciousness, drowsiness, vomiting, disorientation, miosis, mydriasis, hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, hypothermia, generalized seizures, hyperglycemia and glycosuria) can be explained by the agonist action of amitraz on α1 and α2 receptors. Management of amitraz poisoning is still considered to be supportive and symptomatic with monitoring of nervous system, cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Activated charcoal may still be considered for treatment and the place for gastric lavage is controversial. Atropine is effective for symptomatic bradycardia and inotropic support is needed for hypotension that does not respond to fluid resuscitation. Diazepam or Lorazepam is used for convulsions and some patients may require intubation and ICU care. Several α2 adrenergic antagonists like yohimbine have been tried on animals, which have successfully reversed the effects of amitraz. Since the majority of amitraz poisoning cases are due to accidental ingestion, manufactures, regulatory authorities and national poisons control centers have a significant role to play in minimizing its occurrence.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/poisoning , Pesticide Synergists/poisoning , Toluidines/poisoning , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Female , Humans , Pesticide Synergists/administration & dosage , Sri Lanka/epidemiology , Toluidines/administration & dosage , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...