SUGAR-DIP trial: oral medication strategy versus insulin for diabetes in pregnancy, study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: In women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requiring pharmacotherapy, insulin was the established first-line treatment. More recently, oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) have gained popularity as a patient-friendly, less expensive and safe alternative. Monotherapy with metformin or glibenclamide (glyburide) is incorporated in several international guidelines. In women who do not reach sufficient glucose control with OGLD monotherapy, usually insulin is added, either with or without continuation of OGLDs. No reliable data from clinical trials, however, are available on the effectiveness of a treatment strategy using all three agents, metformin, glibenclamide and insulin, in a stepwise approach, compared with insulin-only therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes. In this trial, we aim to assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and patient experience of a stepwise combined OGLD treatment protocol, compared with conventional insulin-based therapy for GDM. METHODS: The SUGAR-DIP trial is an open-label, multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Participants are women with GDM who do not reach target glycaemic control with modification of diet, between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation. Participants will be randomised to either treatment with OGLDs, starting with metformin and supplemented as needed with glibenclamide, or randomised to treatment with insulin. In women who do not reach target glycaemic control with combined metformin and glibenclamide, glibenclamide will be substituted with insulin, while continuing metformin. The primary outcome will be the incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight >90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures are maternal diabetes-related endpoints, obstetric complications, neonatal complications and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Utrecht University Medical Centre. Approval by the boards of management for all participating hospitals will be obtained. Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6134; Pre-results.

Test characteristics of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio as a screening test for primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a widely used screening test for primary aldosteronism. Current guidelines recommend a cut-off value of 91  pmol/mU. Studies on its sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and the role of medication have been conflicting. We prospectively assessed the test characteristics of the ARR and the effect of combination antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: In 178 patients with persistent hypertension despite the use of at least two antihypertensives, plasma renin and aldosterone were assessed twice within an interval of 4 weeks. All patients underwent an intravenous salt loading test. A posttest plasma aldosterone exceeding 235  pmol/l was considered diagnostic for primary aldosteronism. ARR was repeated after 4 weeks of standardized treatment with a calcium channel blocker and/or α-adrenergic-receptor blocker. RESULTS: The prevalence of primary aldosteronism was 15.2%. The median ARR was 35.0 (interquartile range 16.2-82.0) in primary aldosteronism versus 7.1 (2.2-17.5) pmol/mU in essential hypertensive patients (P < 0.001). Under random medication, the ARR had 22.2% sensitivity and 98.7% specificity. On standardized treatment, the ARR rose from 9.6 (2.5-24.8) to 21.4 (10.8-52.1) (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression showed that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor blockers were responsible for the lower ARR during random treatment. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was, however, similar under random and standardized treatment (84 vs. 86%, respectively, P = 0.314). Bland-Altman plots showed an almost five-fold difference in ARR values taken under the same conditions. CONCLUSION: ARR sensitivity for primary aldosteronism is low when the recommended cut-off is used. Reproducibility is also poor, stressing the need for alternative screening tests.

Determinants of blood pressure reduction by eplerenone in uncontrolled hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Add-on therapy with aldosterone receptor antagonists has been reported to lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. We assessed potential predictors of this response. METHODS: In essential hypertensive patients with uncontrolled BP, despite the use of at least two antihypertensives, plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations and the transtubular potassium gradient (TTKG) were measured. Patients were treated with eplerenone 50 mg daily on top of their own medication. The office and ambulatory BP response and biochemical changes were evaluated after 1 week and 3 months of treatment and 6 weeks after discontinuation. Potential predictors for the change in 24-h ambulatory BP were tested in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen patients with a mean age of 50.5 ± 6.6 years were included. Office BP decreased from 149/91 to 142/87 mmHg (P < 0.001) and ambulatory BP from 141/87 to 132/83 mmHg after 3 months of treatment (P < 0.001). Six weeks after discontinuation of eplerenone, office and ambulatory BP measurements returned to baseline values. Treatment resulted in a small rise in serum potassium and creatinine, and a small decrease in the TTKG. In a multivariate model, neither renin, aldosterone, or their ratio, nor the TTKG predicted the BP response. Only baseline ambulatory SBP predicted the BP response, whereas the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy was associated with a smaller BP reduction. CONCLUSION: Add-on therapy with eplerenone effectively lowers BP in patients with difficult-to-treat primary hypertension. This effect is unrelated to circulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity and renal mineralocorticoid receptor activity as assessed by the TTKG.