Quantification of Fluid Volume and Distribution in the Paediatric Colon via Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Previous studies have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify the fluid in the stomach and small intestine of children, and the stomach, small intestine and colon of adults. This is the first study to quantify fluid volumes and distribution using MRI in the paediatric colon. MRI datasets from 28 fasted (aged 0-15 years) and 18 fluid-fed (aged 10-16 years) paediatric participants were acquired during routine clinical care. A series of 2D- and 3D-based software protocols were used to measure colonic fluid volume and localisation. The paediatric colon contained a mean volume of 22.5 mL ± 41.3 mL fluid, (range 0-167.5 mL, median volume 0.80 mL) in 15.5 ± 17.5 discreet fluid pockets (median 12). The proportion of the fluid pockets larger than 1 mL was 9.6%, which contributed to 94.5% of the total fluid volume observed. No correlation was detected between all-ages and colonic fluid volume, nor was a difference in colonic fluid volumes observed based on sex, fed state or age group based on ICH-classifications. This study quantified fluid volumes within the paediatric colon, and these data will aid and accelerate the development of biorelevant tools to progress paediatric drug development for colon-targeting formulations.

Surgery for Acute Subdural Hematoma: Replace or Remove the Bone Flap?

OBJECTIVE: In surgery for acute subdural hematoma (ASDH), the bone flap can be fixed onto the skull, left riding to provide partial skull decompression, or removed. This study assessed whether removing the bone flap improved outcome. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on consecutive patients who were operated for ASDH in our hospital from July 2011 to June 2014. We retrospectively collected data on demographics, injury severity, and predicted and observed outcomes at 6 months. The cohort was divided into 2 groups based on whether the bone flap was replaced (fixed and riding flap craniotomy) or removed (decompressive craniectomy). The differences in functional status, postoperative control of intracranial hypertension, and number of cranial reoperations were analyzed. A subgroup analysis compared decompressive craniectomy with riding flap craniotomy alone. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 99 patients; 69 had decompressive craniectomy, 17 had riding flap craniotomy, and 13 had fixed flap craniotomy. The decompressive craniectomy group had statistically worse injuries, more predicted poor outcomes (69% vs. 57%, P = 0.013), more observed poor outcomes (59% vs. 37%, P = 0.037), equivalent control of intracranial hypertension, and a similar number of reoperations compared with the craniotomy groups. Subgroup analysis between decompressive craniectomy and riding flap craniotomy showed no significant difference in baseline characteristics and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study concluded that removing the bone flap after ASDH evacuation was not associated with a better outcome. We recommend replacing the bone flap if brain conditions allow. Further research is required to evaluate the role of skull decompression in surgery for ASDH.