Detection of cardiac amyloidosis on routine bone scintigraphy: an important gatekeeper role for the nuclear medicine physician.

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA)-mostly transthyretin-related (ATTR-CA)-has recently gained interest in cardiology. Bone scintigraphy (BS) is one of the main screening tools for ATTR-CA but also used for various other reasons. The objective was to evaluate whether all CA cases are detected and what happens during follow-up. All routine BS performed at the Maastricht University Medical Center (May 2012-August 2020) were screened for the presence of CA. Scans performed for suspected CA were excluded. A Perugini stage ≥1 was classified as positive necessitating further examination. The electronic medical record system was evaluated for any contact with cardiology or other specialists until 2021. Of the 2738 BS evaluated, 40 scans (1.46%; median age 73.5 [IQR: 65.8-79.5], 82.5% male) were positive (Perugini grade 1: 31/77.5%, grade 2: 6/15%, grade 3: 3/7.5%); the potential diagnosis ATTR-CA was not seen in 38 patients (95%) by the nuclear medicine specialist. During follow-up, 19 out of those 40 patients (47.5%) underwent cardiac evaluation without diagnosing CA. Available echocardiograms of patients with a positive BS showed left ventricular hypertrophy, a preserved ejection fraction, and diastolic dysfunction ≥2 in 9/47%, 10/53%, and 4/21% of patients, respectively. Additionally, 20 (50%) patients presented to at least one specialty with symptoms indicative of cardiac amyloidosis. The prevalence of a positive BS indicating potential CA in an unselected population is low but substantial. The majority was not detected which asks for better awareness for CA of all involved specialists to ensure appropriate treatment and follow-up.

A graphical analysis of aspects contributing to the spreading of measurements of left ventricular function.

The Simpson's method is the standard technique to determine left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) on echocardiography. The large inter-observer variability of measuring LVEF is well documented but not fully understood. A graphical analysis was used to elaborate what contributes to the inter-observer difference. Forty-two cardiologists (32 male, 39 ± 7 years) evaluated the LVEF using the Simpson's method on 15 different echocardiograms (2 and 4 chamber view (2CH/4CH)); the program did not show the result of EF to prevent a bias. End-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) frames were predefined ensuring measurement at the same time point of the cardiac cycles. After standardization of the LV contour, the differences of the individual contours compared to a reference contour were measured. Also, the spreading of lateral/medial mitral annulus contours and the apex were depicted. A significant spreading of LV-contours was seen with larger contours leading to higher EFs (p < 0.001). Experience did not influence the determination of LVEF. ED-volumes showed more spreading than ES-volumes ((3.6 mm (IQR: 2.6-4.0) vs. 3.4 mm (IQR: 2.8-3.8), p < 0.001). Also, the differences were larger for the 2CH compared to the 4CH (p < 0.001). Variability was significantly larger for lateral than septal wall (p < 0.001) as well as the anterior compared to the inferior wall (p < 0.001). There was a relevant scattering of the apex and medial/ lateral mitral annulus ring. There was a large variability of LV-volumes and LVEF as well as position of mitral valve ring and apex. There were global differences (apical 2CH or 4CH), regional aspects (LV walls) and temporal factors (ED vs. ES). Thus, multiple factors contributed to the large variability.Trial registration: The study was registered at "Netherlands Trial Register" ( www.trialregister.nl ; study number: NL5131).

Cost-Effectiveness Benefits of a Disease Management Program:The REMADHE Trial Results.

BACKGROUND: Published studies have generated mixed, controversial results regarding the cost-effectiveness of heart failure disease management programs (HF-DMPs). This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of an HF-DMP in ambulatory patients compared with usual care (UC). METHODS: In the prospective randomized REMADHE trial, we evaluated incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and life-year (LY) gained as effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over a study period of 2.47 ± 1.75 years. RESULTS: The REMADHE HF-DMP was more effective and less costly than UC in terms of both QALYs and LYs (95% and 55% chance of dominance, respectively). Average saving was US$7345 (2.5%-97.5% bootstrapped confidence interval -16,573 to +921). The chance of DMP being cost-effective at a willingness to pay US$10,000 per QALY or LY was 99% and 96%, respectively. Cost-effectiveness of HF-DMP was highest in subgroups with left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, age >50 years, male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥III, and ischemic etiology. The chance of DMP being cost-effective at a willingness to pay US$10,000 per QALY was ≥90% in all subgroups apart from NYHA functional class I-II, where it was 70%. Even when the intervention costs increased by 500% or when excluding outliers in costs, DMP had a high chance of being cost-effective (87%-99%). CONCLUSIONS: The HF-DMP of the REMADHE trial, which encompasses long-term repeated education alongside telephone monitoring, has a high probability of being cost-effective in ambulatory patients with HF.