ABSTRACT
Chronic respiratory insufficiency is common in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and can be treated with noninvasive home mechanical ventilation (HMV). HMV is not always tolerated well resulting in low treatment adherence. We aimed to analyze if baseline respiratory characteristics such as pulmonary function, level of pCO2 and presence of sleep apnea are associated with HMV treatment adherence in DM1 patients. Pulmonary function testing, polysomnography and blood gas measurement data of DM1 patients were retrospectively collected. Initiation of HMV and treatment adherence after one year was documented. Patients with low treatment adherence (average daily use of HMV <5 h) were grouped with patients that discontinued HMV and compared with patients with high treatment adherence (average daily use of HMV >5 h). HMV was initiated in 101 patients. After one year, 58 patients had low treatment adherence. There were no differences between the low and high treatment adherence group regarding the respiratory characteristics. None of the included predictors (gender, age, body mass index, cytosine-thymine-guanine repeat length, FVC, daytime pCO2, bicarbonate, nighttime pCO2, nighttime base excess, apnea-hypopnea index and mean saturation during sleep) was able to significantly predict high treatment adherence. In conclusion, the respiratory characteristics are not associated with treatment adherence with HMV in DM1 patients and cannot be used to identify patients at risk for low HMV treatment adherence.
Subject(s)
Myotonic Dystrophy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Myotonic Dystrophy/complications , Myotonic Dystrophy/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Blood Gas Analysis , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
Long-term or home mechanical noninvasive ventilation (Home-NIV) has become a well-established form of therapy over the last few decades for chronic hypercapnic COPD patients in European countries. However, meta-analyses and clinical guidelines do not recommend Home-NIV for COPD patients on a routine basis. In particular, there is ongoing debate about Home-NIV in chronic hypercapnic COPD regarding the overall effects, the most favorable treatment strategy, the selection of eligible patients, and the time point at which it is prescribed. The current review focuses on specific aspects of patient selection and discusses the various scientific as well as clinical-guided perspectives on Home-NIV in patients suffering from chronic hypercapnic COPD. In addition, special attention will be given to the topic of ventilator settings and interfaces.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Home Care Services , Hypercapnia/therapy , Lung/physiopathology , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Patient Selection , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Humans , Hypercapnia/diagnosis , Hypercapnia/physiopathology , Patient Compliance , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although high-intensity non-invasive ventilation has been shown to improve outcomes in stable COPD, it may adversely affect cardiac performance. Therefore, the aims of the present pilot study were to compare cardiac and pulmonary effects of 6 weeks of low-intensity non-invasive ventilation and 6 weeks of high-intensity non-invasive ventilation in stable COPD patients. METHODS: In a randomised crossover pilot feasibility study, the change in cardiac output after 6 weeks of each NIV mode compared to baseline was assessed with echocardiography in 14 severe stable COPD patients. Furthermore, CO during NIV, gas exchange, lung function, and health-related quality of life were investigated. RESULTS: Three patients dropped out: two deteriorated on low-intensity non-invasive ventilation, and one presented with decompensated heart failure while on high-intensity non-invasive ventilation. Eleven patients were included in the analysis. In general, cardiac output and NTproBNP did not change, although individual effects were noticed, depending on the pressures applied and/or the co-existence of heart failure. High-intensity non-invasive ventilation tended to be more effective in improving gas exchange, but both modes improved lung function and the health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term non-invasive ventilation with adequate pressure to improve gas exchange and health-related quality of life did not have an overall adverse effect on cardiac performance. Nevertheless, in patients with pre-existing heart failure, the application of very high inspiratory pressures might reduce cardiac output. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS-ID: DRKS00007977 ).
