Exclusion of cervical spine instability in patients with blunt trauma with normal multidetector CT (MDCT) and radiography.

The objective of the study was to determine if negative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and lateral radiography of the cervical spine effectively excludes patients with unstable cervical spine injuries. Over a period of 40 months, 6558 people were admitted to our trauma service with blunt injury and 447 (6.8%) were found to have cervical fractures. Fractures were identified by CT and/or lateral radiography. In order to rule out clinically significant instability in the absence of fracture, we identified nine patients who required any type of stabilization of the cervical spine including anterior fusion, posterior fusion and external orthosis. These patients also underwent MR of the cervical spine. Radiography, CT, and MR images and reports of these nine patients were reviewed. Nine patients without a fracture required cervical stabilization. These patients had the following abnormalities: disc herniation with canal stenosis in three, unilateral jumped facet in three, and various other soft tissue abnormalities in three, all of which were evident on CT or radiography. All nine patients had evidence for cervical spine injury or instability by MDCT. Normal MDCT and radiography appears adequate to 'clear' the cervical spine. We recommend that patients requiring cervical spine clearance undergo a complete MDCT and lateral radiograph of the cervical spine. If these studies are entirely normal, then the cervical spine may be cleared. If any abnormalities, including disc herniation, soft tissue swelling and bony malalignments are noted by radiography and/or MDCT, further studies, including MR, are indicated prior to clearance of the cervical spine.

The effect of trauma program registry on reported mortality rates.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the relationship that the brand of trauma program registry (TPR) has on mortality rate (MR) in the reports prepared by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) trauma center (TC) site surveyors. METHODS: Data from 242 ACSCOT adult TC survey reports (88 Level I, 115 Level II, and 39 Level III) were analyzed for annual trauma volume, injury severity score (ISS), MR, and TPR. Six TPR (A through F) were identified; group F was a composite of several infrequently used TPRs. This report focuses on the ISS range 16-24 because of the likelihood that the mean for each TC would be near 20 and MR is high enough so that a difference, if present, could be statistically documented. RESULTS: For the total group, MR showed no correlation with TC volume or TC level for ISS 16-24. MR was significantly different according to which TPR was used by the TCs. The MR is less (4.8%) for 14 high volume TCs (over 1200 admits) using TPR A compared with 33 low volume TCs (below 800 admits) using TPR A (6.34%). CONCLUSION: The MR for ISS 16-24 in ACSCOT-surveyed TCs differs within subgroups based on type of TPR utilized. This may reflect improper use of the software programs. Enhanced skill in the application of software programs designed to generate ISS scores is essential if meaningful studies on the effects of improved trauma care on MR are to be conducted. Hand scored ISS by trained personnel may circumvent this problem.

Mathematical modeling to define optimum operating room staffing needs for trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Level II trauma centers may be verified (1999, American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma) with an on-call operating room team if the performance-improvement program shows no adverse outcomes. Using queuing and simulation methodology, this study attempted to add a volume guideline. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 72 previously verified trauma centers identified multiple demographic factors, including specific information about the first trauma-related operation that was done between 11:00 PM and 7:00 AM each month for 12 consecutive months. RESULTS: The annual admissions averaged 1,477 for 37 Level I trauma centers, 802 for 28 Level II trauma centers, 481 for 4 Level III trauma centers, and 731 for 3 pediatric trauma centers. The annual admissions correlated with the number of operations done between 11:00 PM and 7:00 AM (p < 0.001). These 946 operations were performed by general surgery (39%), neurosurgery (8%), orthopaedic surgery (33%), another specialty (9%), or multiple services (10%). Admission to operation time was within 30 minutes for 12.1% of patients (2.6% for blunt and 24.1% for penetrating injuries). The probability of operation within 30 minutes of arrival varied with the number of admissions and with the percentage of penetrating versus blunt injuries. The likely number of operations from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM would be 19 for 500 annual admissions, 26 for 750 annual admissions, and 34 for 1,000 annual admissions, with 5.83, 7.98, and 10.13 patients, respectively, going to operation within 30 min. The probability that two rooms would be occupied simultaneously was 0.14 and 0.24 for centers admitting 500 and 1,000 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma centers performing fewer than six operations between 11:00 PM and 7:00 AM per year could conserve resources by using an immediately available on-call team, with responses monitored by the performance-improvement program.

Dose response to cerebrospinal fluid drainage on cerebral perfusion in traumatic brain-injured adults.

OBJECT: Intracranial hypertension remains a common complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Ventriculostomy drainage is a recommended therapy to decrease intracranial pressure (ICP), but little empirical evidence exists to guide treatment. The authors conducted a study to examine systematically the effect of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) drainage on ICP and indices of cerebral perfusion. METHODS: Intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), and near-infrared spectroscopy-determined regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2) were measured in 58 patients (with Glasgow Coma Scale scores < or = 8) before, during, and after ventriculostomy drainage. Three randomly ordered CSF drainage protocols varied in the volume of CSF removed (1 ml, 2 ml, and 3 ml). Physiological variables were time averaged in 1-minute blocks from baseline to 10 minutes after cessation of ventricular drainage. There was a significant dose-time interaction for ICP with the three-extraction volume protocol, with incremental decreases in ICP (F [20, 1055] = 6.10; p = 0.0001). There was a significant difference in the CPP depending on the amount of CSF removed (F [2, 1787] = 3.22; p = 0.040) and across time (F [10, 9.58] = 11.9; p = 0.0003) without a significant dose-time interaction. A 3-ml withdrawal of CSF resulted in a 10.1% decrease in ICP and a 2.2% increase in CPP, which were sustained for 10 minutes. There was no significant dose, time or dose-time interaction with CBFV or rSO2. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (3 ml) significantly reduced ICP and increased CPP for at least 10 minutes. Analysis of these findings supports the use of ventriculostomy drainage as a means of at least temporarily reducing elevated ICP in patients with TBI.

Pathophysiology of evolution and recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma.

Although the pathophysiology of the development, propagation, and recurrence of current subdural hematoma remains debatable, fundamental management strategies may be formulated to optimize outcomes. Effective drainage by whatever surgical means, removal of offending membranes when appropriate, and maximization of postoperative physiologic parameters are based on the best available current pathophysiologic information.

The effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on cerebral perfusion in traumatic brain injured adults.

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage is a first line treatment used to manage severely elevated intracranial pressure (> or = 20 mm Hg) and improve outcomes in patients with acute head injury. There is no consensus regarding the optimal method of cerebrospinal fluid removal. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether cerebrospinal fluid drainage decreases intracranial pressure and improves cerebral perfusion and to identify factors that impact treatment effectiveness. This study involved 31 severely head injured patients. Intracranial pressure and other indices of cerebral perfusion (cerebral perfusion pressure, cerebral blood flow velocity, and regional cerebral oximetry) were measured before, during, and after cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Arterial and jugular venous oxygen content was measured before and after cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Patients underwent three randomly ordered cerebrospinal fluid drainage protocols that varied in the volume of cerebrospinal fluid removed (1 mL, 2 mL, and 3 mL) for a total of 6 mL of cerebrospinal fluid removed. There was a significant change in the intracranial pressure from a mean at baseline of 26.1 mm Hg (SD = 4.4) to 22.1 mm Hg immediately after drainage. One third of patients experienced a decrease in the intracranial pressure below 20 mm Hg; in two patients the intracranial pressure dropped less than 1 mm Hg. The following factors predicted 61.5% of the variance in the responsiveness of intracranial pressure to drainage: vecuronium hypothermia, baseline cerebral perfusion pressure and acuity of illness. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage provides a transient decrease in intracranial pressure without a measurable improvement in other indices of cerebral perfusion.

The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: Results of a multicenter study.

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, retrospective study using computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging data to establish quantitative, reliable criteria of canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a radiologic assessment tool of spinal canal compromise and cord compression in cervical spinal cord injury for use in clinical trials. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few quantitative, reliable criteria for radiologic measurement of cervical spinal canal compromise or cord compression after acute spinal cord injury. METHODS: The study included 71 patients (55 men, 16 women; mean age, 39.7 +/- 18.7 years) with acute cervical spinal cord injury. Causes of spinal cord injury included motor vehicle accidents (n = 36), falls (n = 20), water-related injuries (n = 8), sports (n = 5), assault (n = 1), and farm accidents (n = 1). Canal compromise was measured on computed tomographic scan and T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and cord compression at the level of maximum injury was measured on T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. All films were assessed by two independent observers. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation of canal compromise and/or cord compression measurements between axial and midsagittal computed tomography, and between axial and midsagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Spinal canal compromise assessed by computed tomography showed a significant although moderate correlation with spinal cord compression assessed by T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Virtually all patients with canal compromise of 25% or more on computed tomographic scan had evidence of some degree of cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging, but a large number of patients with less than 25% canal compromise on computed tomographic scan also had evidence on magnetic resonance imaging of cord compression. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical spinal cord injury, the midsagittal T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging provides an objective, quantifiable, and reliable assessment of spinal cord compression that cannot be adequately assessed by computed tomography alone.

Methylprednisolone or tirilazad mesylate administration after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow up. Results of the third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury randomized controlled trial.

OBJECT: A randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted to compare neurological and functional recovery and morbidity and mortality rates 1 year after acute spinal cord injury in patients who had received a standard 24-hour methylprednisolone regimen (24MP) with those in whom an identical MP regimen had been delivered for 48 hours (48MP) or those who had received a 48-hour tirilazad mesylate (48TM) regimen. METHODS: Patients for whom treatment was initiated within 3 hours of injury showed equal neurological and functional recovery in all three treatment groups. Patients for whom treatment was delayed more than 3 hours experienced diminished motor function recovery in the 24MP group, but those in the 48MP group showed greater 1-year motor recovery (recovery scores of 13.7 and 19, respectively, p=0.053). A greater percentage of patients improving three or more neurological grades was also observed in the 48MP group (p=0.073). In general, patients treated with 48TM recovered equally when compared with those who received 24MP treatments. A corresponding recovery in self care and sphincter control was seen but was not statistically significant. Mortality and morbidity rates at 1 year were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients in whom MP therapy is initiated within 3 hours of injury, 24-hour maintenance is appropriate. Patients starting therapy 3 to 8 hours after injury should be maintained on the regimen for 48 hours unless there are complicating medical factors.

Athletic spinal cord and spine injuries. Guidelines for initial management.

Unfortunately, spine and spinal cord injuries occur frequently in athletic competition. Most, however, are minor injuries requiring short-term medical treatment and vigilance. This article briefly reviews the athlete who suffers a spinal cord injury in competition while focusing on initial management.

Guidelines for return to contact or collision sport after a cervical spine injury.

Pro football is a violent, dangerous sport. To play it other than violently would be "imbecilic," according to the late Vince Lombardi. Many sports hold the potential for serious permanent spine and spinal cord injury. Fortunately, the incidence of catastrophic spine and spinal cord injuries has dramatically declined in the past 10 to 15 years. This decline is, in part, attributable to the development of sports-related spine injury registries, the education of the pathomechanics of these injuries, and the implementation of appropriate preventive measures. This article focuses on sports-related spinal cord and nerve injuries, ranging from the mild "stinger" syndrome to complete quadriplegia, with emphasis on recommendations for return to competition.

Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of methylprednisolone administered for 24 hours with methyprednisolone administered for 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate administered for 48 hours in patients with acute spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Sixteen acute spinal cord injury centers in North America. PATIENTS: A total of 499 patients with acute spinal cord injury diagnosed in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) centers within 8 hours of injury. INTERVENTION: All patients received an intravenous bolus of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) before randomization. Patients in the 24-hour regimen group (n=166) received a methylprednisolone infusion of 5.4 mg/kg per hour for 24 hours, those in the 48-hour regimen group (n=167) received a methylprednisolone infusion of 5.4 mg/kg per hour for 48 hours, and those in the tirilazad group (n=166) received a 2.5 mg/kg bolus infusion of tirilazad mesylate every 6 hours for 48 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motor function change between initial presentation and at 6 weeks and 6 months after injury, and change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assessed at 6 weeks and 6 months. RESULTS: Compared with patients treated with methylprednisolone for 24 hours, those treated with methylprednisolone for 48 hours showed improved motor recovery at 6 weeks (P=.09) and 6 months (P=.07) after injury. The effect of the 48-hour methylprednisolone regimen was significant at 6 weeks (P=.04) and 6 months (P=.01) among patients whose therapy was initiated 3 to 8 hours after injury. Patients who received the 48-hour regimen and who started treatment at 3 to 8 hours were more likely to improve 1 full neurologic grade (P=.03) at 6 months, to show more improvement in 6-month FIM (P=.08), and to have more severe sepsis and severe pneumonia than patients in the 24-hour methylprednisolone group and the tirilazad group, but other complications and mortality (P=.97) were similar. Patients treated with tirilazad for 48 hours showed motor recovery rates equivalent to patients who received methylprednisolone for 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute spinal cord injury who receive methylprednisolone within 3 hours of injury should be maintained on the treatment regimen for 24 hours. When methylprednisolone is initiated 3 to 8 hours after injury, patients should be maintained on steroid therapy for 48 hours.

Defining the limits of survivorship after very severe head injury.

BACKGROUND: Reliable prediction of outcome after head injury is a daunting task. Although previous reports have highlighted the difficulties of determining outcome in the cohort of severe head injury Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < or = 8), we wondered within the very severely injured population (GCS score 3-5) if a simple combination of clinical parameters may be predictive of poor outcome. METHODS: All patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center with a GCS score of 3 to 5 from 1986 to 1991 inclusive (380 patients) were retrospectively reviewed and outcome a minimum of 6 months after injury was determined by chart review or telephone. RESULTS: Follow-up was accomplished in all but five patients (1.3%). Functional survival (nonvegetative) was correlated to admission GCS score, pupillary abnormalities, and age. As anticipated, overall functional survival was poor (12.5%), and even worse among those evidencing pupillary abnormalities (6.6%). Interestingly, there was an absence of survivors in the advanced age decades, with the oldest functional survivor of any GCS increasing in a stepwise fashion with increasing coma score. This translated into the oldest survivor of a GCS score of 3 being in their chronologic 30s, a score of 4 in their 40s, and a score of 5 in their 50s. Among patients older than these age decades, that is beyond this simple age/GCS cut-off (32.8% of cohort), there were no functional survivors (95% confidence interval 0, 2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Within the population of very severely head injured patients (GCS score 3-5), the simple combination of age and admission GCS score appears to predict accurately non-functional outcome in almost one third of patients. If confirmed at other centers, this may have wide-ranging implications regarding counseling of families, utilization of resources, and the design of head injury studies.

The learning curve for acoustic tumor surgery.

Although operative experience is considered to be critically important in the surgical management of acoustic tumors, little objective evidence substantiates this claim. The present study was undertaken to determine whether a learning curve exists for acoustic tumor surgery. The first 96 acoustic tumor patients managed surgically by a new neurotologic team were retrospectively reviewed. A significant improvement (P<.0003; F=6.32) in the ability to achieve good (grade II or better) postoperative facial nerve function was identified. Improving trends for complete resection rate and hearing preservation were documented, and the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks declined; however, statistical significance was not achieved. For postoperative facial nerve function, approximately 60 cases were necessary before the new team achieved results similar to those of highly experienced surgeons. The frequencies of complete resection, CSF leaks, hearing preservation, stroke, and mortality were comparable to those of experienced neurotologic teams. The findings of this study may have implications for both patient care and physician training.