Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Fecal Microbiota in Individuals with Morbid Obesity.

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the etiology of obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a frequently performed and effective therapy for morbid obesity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of sleeve gastrectomy on the fecal microbiota of individuals with morbid obesity and to examine whether shifts in microbiota composition are associated with markers of inflammation and intestinal barrier function. METHODS: Fecal and blood samples of healthy individuals (n = 27) and morbidly obese individuals pre-SG (n = 24), and at 2 months (n = 13) and 6 months post-SG (n = 9) were collected. The 16SrRNA gene was sequenced to assess microbiota composition. Fecal calprotectin, plasma inflammatory markers and intestinal permeability markers (multi-sugar test) were determined. RESULTS: Fecal microbiota composition between morbidly obese and lean individuals was significantly different. The fecal microbiota composition changed significantly 2 and 6 months post-SG (p = 0.008) compared to pre-SG but not towards a more lean profile. The post-SG microbiota profile was characterized by an increase in facultative anaerobic bacteria, characteristic for the upper gastrointestinal tract. No correlations were found between inflammatory markers, intestinal permeability and microbial profile changes. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal microbiota composition in morbidly obese individuals changed significantly following SG. This change might be explained by functional changes induced by the SG procedure.

Review on the Regional Effects of Gastrointestinal Luminal Stimulation on Appetite and Energy Intake: (Pre)clinical Observations.

Macronutrients in the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen are able to activate "intestinal brakes", feedback mechanisms on proximal GI motility and secretion including appetite and energy intake. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the current evidence with respect to four questions: (1) are regional differences (duodenum, jejunum, ileum) present in the intestinal luminal nutrient modulation of appetite and energy intake? (2) is this "intestinal brake" effect macronutrient specific? (3) is this "intestinal brake" effect maintained during repetitive activation? (4) can the "intestinal brake" effect be activated via non-caloric tastants? Recent evidence indicates that: (1) regional differences exist in the intestinal modulation of appetite and energy intake with a proximal to distal gradient for inhibition of energy intake: ileum and jejunum > duodenum at low but not at high caloric infusion rates. (2) the "intestinal brake" effect on appetite and energy appears not to be macronutrient specific. At equi-caloric amounts, the inhibition on energy intake and appetite is in the same range for fat, protein and carbohydrate. (3) data on repetitive ileal brake activation are scarce because of the need for prolonged intestinal intubation. During repetitive activation of the ileal brake for up to 4 days, no adaptation was observed but overall the inhibitory effect on energy intake was small. (4) the concept of influencing energy intake by intra-intestinal delivery of non-caloric tastants is intriguing. Among tastants, the bitter compounds appear to be more effective in influencing energy intake. Energy intake decreases modestly after post-oral delivery of bitter tastants or a combination of tastants (bitter, sweet and umami). Intestinal brake activation provides an interesting concept for preventive and therapeutic approaches in weight management strategies.

Intestinal barrier function in morbid obesity: results of a prospective study on the effect of sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been associated with impaired intestinal barrier function. It is not known whether bariatric surgery leads to changes in intestinal barrier function. We hypothesized that obesity is associated with disturbances in gastrointestinal barrier function, and that after bariatric surgery barrier function will improve. METHODS: Prospective single center study in which we assessed segmental gut permeability by urinary recovery of a multisugar drink in 27 morbidly obese (BMI 43.3 ± 1.1 kg/m2) and 27 age and gender matched lean subjects (BMI 22.9 ± 0.43 kg/m2). Fecal calprotectin, SCFAs, plasma cytokines, and hsCRP were assessed as inflammatory and metabolic markers. Comparisons: (a) morbidly obese subjects vs. controls and (b) 2 and 6 months postsleeve vs. presleeve gastrectomy (n = 14). In another group of 10 morbidly obese and 11 matched lean subjects colonic and ileal biopsies were obtained in order to measure gene transcription of tight junction proteins. RESULTS: Gastroduodenal permeability (urinary sucrose recovery) was significantly increased in obese vs. lean controls (p < 0.05). Small intestinal and colonic permeability (urinary recovery of lactulose/L-rhamnose and sucralose/erythritol, respectively) in obese subjects were not significantly different from controls. Morbidly obese subjects had a proinflammatory systemic and intestinal profile compared with lean subjects. After sleeve gastrectomy BMI decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Postsleeve gastroduodenal permeability normalized to values that do not differ from lean controls. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroduodenal permeability, but not small intestinal or colonic permeability, is significantly increased in morbidly obese patients. After sleeve gastrectomy, gastroduodenal permeability normalized to values in the range of lean controls. Thus, the proximal gastrointestinal barrier is compromised in morbid obesity and is associated with a proinflammatory intestinal and systemic profile.