Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Med Sci Educ ; 32(1): 31-37, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35154892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of implicit bias our trainees experience in the form of role misidentification in the clinical learning environment. ACTIVITY: We surveyed 540 residents and clinical medical students to determine the frequency and impact of role misidentification. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Most respondents (85%, n = 162) experienced role misidentification, directly resulting in heightened emotions that led to guarded behavior. An additional indirect impact for trainees is transmitted through frequent non-promotional role misidentification and personalizing the incidents. Women and trainees with marginalized identities had significant impacts. These findings present an opportunity to improve our understanding of the trainee experience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01475-9.

2.
J Surg Res ; 270: 555-563, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34826691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: All-terrain vehicle (ATV) use is widespread, however, little is known about injury patterns and outcomes in geriatric patients. We hypothesized that geriatric patients would have distinct and more severe injuries than non-geriatric adults after ATV trauma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Trauma Databank comparing non-geriatric (18-64) and geriatric adults (≥65) presenting after ATV trauma at Level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, admission, and outcomes data were collected, including injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score, discharge disposition, and mortality. We performed univariate statistical tests between cohorts and multiple logistic regression models to assess for risk factors associated with severe injury (ISS>15) and mortality. RESULTS: 23,568 ATV trauma patients were identified, of whom 1,954 (8.3%) were geriatric. Geriatric patients had higher rates of severe injury(29.2 v 22.5%,p<0.0001), and thoracic (55.2 v 37.8%,p<0.0001) and spine (31.5 v 26.0%,p<0.0001) injuries, but lower rates of abdominal injuries (14.6 v 17.9%,p<0.001) as compared to non-geriatric adults. Geriatric patients had overall lower head injury rates (39.2 v 42.1%,p=0.01), but more severe head injuries (AIS>3) (36.2 vs 30.2%,p<0.001). Helmet use was significantly lower in geriatric patients (12.0 v 22.8%,p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis age increased the odds for both severe injury (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.72, p<0.0001) and mortality (OR 5.07, 95% CI 3.42-7.50, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While severe injury and mortality after ATV trauma occurred in all adults, geriatric adults suffered distinct injury patterns and were at greater risk for severe injury and mortality.


Subject(s)
Off-Road Motor Vehicles , Wounds and Injuries , Adult , Aged , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology
3.
J Surg Res ; 262: 85-92, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Snowmobiling is a popular activity that leads to geriatric trauma admissions; however, this unique trauma population is not well characterized. We aimed to compare the injury burden and outcomes for geriatric versus nongeriatric adults injured riding snowmobiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Trauma Databank comparing nongeriatric (18-64) and geriatric adults (≥65) presenting after snowmobile-related trauma at level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, admission, injury, and outcome data were collected and compared. A multivariate logistic regression model assessed for risk factors associated with severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15). Analysis was also performed using chi square, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis testing. RESULTS: A total of 2471 adult patients with snowmobile trauma were identified; 122 (4.9%) were geriatric. Rates of severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15) were similar between groups, 27.5% in geriatric patients and 22.5% in nongeriatric adults (P = 0.2). Geriatric patients experienced higher rates of lower extremity injury (50.4 versus 40.3%, P = 0.03), neck injury (4.1 versus 1.4%, P = 0.02), and severe spine injury (20.6 versus 7.0%, P = 0.004). Geriatric patients had longer hospitalizations (5 versus 3 d, P < 0.0001), rates of discharge to a facility (36.8% versus 12%, P < 0.0001), and higher mortality (4.1 versus 0.6%, P < 0.0001). Geriatric age did not independently increase the risk for severe injury. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric age was not a significant predictor of severe injury after snowmobile trauma; however, geriatric patients suffered unique injuries, had longer hospitalizations, had higher rates of discharge to a facility, and had higher mortality. Tailored geriatric care may improve outcomes in this unique sport-related trauma population.


Subject(s)
Off-Road Motor Vehicles , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Injuries/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Young Adult
4.
J Surg Res ; 259: 121-129, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Downhill skiing accounts for a large portion of geriatric sport-related trauma. We assessed the national burden of geriatric versus nongeriatric ski trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults presenting to level 1/2 trauma centers after ski-associated injuries from 2011 to 2015 were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank by ICD-9 code. We compared demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes between geriatric (age ≥65 y) and nongeriatric adult skiers (age 18-64 y). A multiple regression analysis assessed for risk factors associated with severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15). RESULTS: We identified 3255 adult ski trauma patients, and 16.7% (543) were geriatric. Mean ages for nongeriatric versus geriatric skiers were 40.8 and 72.1 y, respectively. Geriatric skiers more often suffered head (36.7 versus 24.3%, P < 0.0001), severe head (abbreviated injury scale score >3, 49.0 versus 31.5%, P < 0.0001) and thorax injuries (22.2 versus 18.1%, P = 0.03) as compared with nongeriatric skiers. Geriatric skiers were also more often admitted to the ICU (26.5 versus 14.9%, P < 0.0001), discharged to a facility (26.7 versus 11.6%, P < 0.0001), and suffered higher mortality rates (1.3 versus 0.4%, P = 0.004). Independent risk factors for severe injury included being male (OR: 1.68, CI: 1.22-2.31), helmeted (OR: 1.41, CI: 1.07-1.85), and having comorbidities (OR: 1.37, CI: 1.05-1.80). Geriatric age was not independently associated with severe injury. CONCLUSIONS: At level 1/2 trauma centers, geriatric age in ski trauma victims was associated with unique injury patterns, higher acuity, increased rates of facility care at discharge, and higher mortality as compared with nongeriatric skiers. Our findings indicate the need for specialized care after high impact geriatric ski trauma.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Skiing/injuries , Thoracic Injuries/epidemiology , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnosis , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Databases, Factual , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Skiing/statistics & numerical data , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/etiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
Injury ; 51(9): 2040-2045, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631617

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As the population ages, trauma centers are seeing a significant volume of injured geriatric patients. However, there is limited data on geriatric off-roading incidents. We investigated the injury patterns, severity and outcomes of geriatric versus younger adult all-terrain vehicle (ATV) and snowmobile related trauma with the hypothesis that geriatric patients will have higher mortality and worsened outcomes. METHODS: The trauma registry at a New England Level 1 trauma center was queried by ICD 9/10 code for adult ATV and/or snowmobile-related trauma from 2011-2019. Data reviewed included demographic, admission, injury, and outcomes data including injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score, hospital disposition, and mortality. Patients were stratified by age into younger adults (18-64 years old) versus geriatric (65 years and older). Univariate analysis was performed to compare groups. RESULTS: Over the study period, we identified 390 adult ATV or snowmobile-related trauma patients, of whom 38 were geriatric. The mean ages for the younger adult vs. geriatric cohorts were 41(SD 13) and 73(SD 5), respectively. The majority of patients were male (77%). Compared to younger adults, geriatric patients were more often unhelmeted (66 v 38%, p=0.004) and more likely to present after ATV as opposed to snowmobile trauma (71 v 51%, p=0.028). Geriatric patients more often sustained both any chest trauma (68 v 41%, p=0.003) and severe chest trauma (AIS≥3, 55 v 31%, p=0.022), and more often required tube thoracostomy (26 v 12%, p=0.042). Geriatric patients were also more often discharged to a facility (39 v 14%, p<0.001) compared to younger patients. There were no differences between age cohorts regarding arrival Glasgow coma scale scores, ISS>15, length of stay, ventilator days, complications, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Following ATV or snowmobile-related trauma, geriatric patients were more likely to sustain severe chest trauma and to require additional care upon hospital discharge as compared to younger adults. Primary prevention should focus on encouraging helmet and chest protective clothing use in this geriatric population.


Subject(s)
Off-Road Motor Vehicles , Wounds and Injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Young Adult
6.
J Surg Res ; 253: 149-155, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32361075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We compared the representation of women panelists at two large, general interest surgical meetings: the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Scientific Congress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed comprehensive analyses of panels and panelists at ACS and RACS meetings (2013-2018). Manual review was conducted to determine counts and proportions of invited panelists by gender. We made within- and between-meeting comparisons regarding gender representation by specialty track. Tracks were characterized after our review of meeting programs. RESULTS: There were 4542 panelists and 1390 panels at RACS from 2013 to 2018. At ACS, there were 3363 panelists over 693 panels. The specialty tracks with the highest proportion of men-only panels were transplant (75%) and cardiothoracic (63%) at ACS and cardiothoracic (83%) and multidisciplinary (81%) at RACS. The lowest proportions of men-only panels were in breast and pediatric surgery at ACS (5% and 11%, respectively) and breast and rural surgery at RACS (24% and 36%, respectively). At ACS, the highest proportions of women panelists were on panels in breast (63%) and endocrine surgery (48%) and in breast (44%) and rural surgery (33%) at RACS, while the lowest proportion of women panelists were in transplant (10%) and cardiothoracic (14%) at ACS and multidisciplinary (8%) and cardiothoracic (7%) at RACS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a persistent difference in gender representation at surgical meetings, particularly within certain subspecialties. Program chairs and committees could increase the proportion of women by focusing on who serves as panelists overall and within specialty tracks.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Specialties, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Australasia , Congresses as Topic/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , United States
8.
J Am Coll Surg ; 229(4): 397-403, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31265914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing attention to gender inequity in speakers at professional meetings. The aim of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in representation of women at the Academic Surgical Congress (ASC) and American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress (CC), 2 prominent general interest, national surgical meetings. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed ASC (2014-2019) and CC (2013-2018) meeting programs to determine counts and proportions of invited panelists and moderators by gender, including the frequency of men-only panels. We conducted trend analyses to assess for temporal change in gender representation and univariate tests of association between different measures of gender representation. RESULTS: The overall proportions of women panelists were 35% (ASC) and 28% (CC). There was a significant increase in the proportion of women panelists over the study period at the CC (23% to 34%, p = 0.007) but not at the ASC (37% to 36%, p = 0.79). The proportion of men-only panels decreased significantly over time at the CC (38% to 23%, p = 0.04), but not at the ASC (23% to 17%, p = 0.50), while the proportion of moderators at the ASC increased significantly (31% to 43%, p = 0.01), but not at the CC (29% to 37%, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Women remain in the minority of panelists and moderators at the ASC and CC meetings, and approximately 1 in 5 panels are composed entirely of men. Although progress has been made at both meetings, ongoing and deliberate attention is needed to ensure continued progress toward the goal of equitable gender representation in academic surgery.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic/trends , Physicians, Women/trends , Sexism/trends , Surgeons/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Societies, Medical/trends , United States
9.
J Surg Res ; 244: 430-435, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly reported in the literature and are subsequently relied on for clinical decision-making. In 2013, CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) added 5 guidelines for reporting PROs in randomized controlled trials, the PRO extensions. Adherence to the extensions among inguinal hernia trials is unknown. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to find RCTs evaluating inguinal hernia repair. Inclusion criteria were RCTs evaluating surgical management of inguinal hernia that included PROs as primary or secondary outcomes, published from January, 2014 through July, 2018. Exclusion criteria were nonelective repairs, age <18 y, or articles unavailable in English. Two researchers graded the articles for compliance with the extensions. RESULTS: We identified 1548 articles, 78 of which met inclusion criteria. Four articles (5%) met all 5 extensions, whereas five (6%) did not meet any of the extensions. The extension requiring "identification of the PROs in the abstract as a primary or secondary outcome" was most commonly satisfied (83%), whereas that requiring the article "reference PRO instrument validity" was least satisfied (23%). Pain was the most frequently studied PRO and a visual analog scale was the most frequently used instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal hernia trials demonstrate poor adherence to the PRO extensions. PRO data from these trials have been published widely; however, the lack of standardization in reporting calls into question the generalizability of these findings. Further education about these guidelines is necessary to improve PRO reporting and ensure optimal patient-centered care based on high quality evidence.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
Surgery ; 166(5): 764-768, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31253417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A proliferation of work on surgical quality improvement has brought about an increase in quality improvement publications. We assessed the quality of surgical quality improvement publications using the Standards of Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the surgical quality improvement literature from 2008 to 2018. Articles were reviewed for concordance with 18 SQUIRE statements and 40 subheadings using a dichotomous (yes or no) scale. RESULTS: Fifty-five articles were included. No publication adhered to all 18 SQUIRE statements. On average, quality improvement publications met 11 out of 18 (61%) of the main statements and 26 out of 40 (65%) of the subheadings. Articles were concordant with introductory components, such as problem description (n = 55, 100%) and rationale (n = 52, 95%), but were less adherent to statements describing methodology, results, and discussion sections including measures (n = 7, 13%), results (n = 3, 5.5%), interpretation (n = 2, 3.6%), and conclusions (n = 2, 3.6%). Only 4 articles cited the SQUIRE guidelines (7.3%). Articles that cited SQUIRE were not more concordant to the statements than those that did not cite SQUIRE. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that SQUIRE guidelines have not been adopted widely as a framework for the reporting of surgical quality improvement studies. Increased adherence to SQUIRE guidelines has the potential to improve the development and dissemination of surgical quality improvement projects.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/organization & administration , Publishing/standards , Quality Improvement , Research Design/standards , Consensus , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Research Design/statistics & numerical data
12.
Fam Syst Health ; 36(1): 87-96, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29172625

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Spousal support is one of the strongest and most consistent predictors of Type 2 diabetes treatment adherence. However, the effects of both spouses' evaluations of dyadic coping on emotional distress and patients' physical health remain largely unknown. METHOD: Dyadic data from 117 married couples in which one member is diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes were evaluated in two separate models to explore the associations between (a) patients' and spouses' depression symptoms and patients' adherence to dietary and exercise regimens, and (b) patients' and spouses' acute stress levels and patients' adherence to dietary and exercise regimens. Finally, evaluative dyadic coping was included as a possible moderator between these associations. RESULTS: Results from an actor-partner interdependence model revealed significant actor effects of patients' depression symptoms on patients' adherence to dietary and exercise regimens. Spouses' evaluation of dyadic coping attenuated the direct paths between spouses' depression symptoms and patients' adherence to dietary regimens. No direct pathways were found from patients' or spouses' acute stress to patients' adherence to dietary and exercise regimens. However, spouses' evaluation of dyadic coping attenuated the direct paths between spouses' acute stress and patients' adherence to dietary regimens. DISCUSSION: Tapping into spouses' evaluations of dyadic coping has significant implications for patients' diabetes health outcomes (e.g., adherence to dietary and exercise treatment regimens). Findings from this study highlight the need for systemic interventions targeting both partners. (PsycINFO Database Record


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/psychology , Aged , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Fam Relat ; 66(2): 273-286, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29151662

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore dyadic associations between economic pressure and diabetes self-efficacy via emotional distress in patients with type 2 diabetes and their partners. Background: Understanding how economic pressure is associated with successful diabetes management is an important area for research, as couples with type 2 diabetes can incur heavy economic pressures that could likely influence diabetes outcomes. Method: Data from 117 married couples were used to test actor-partner associations using moderated mediation analyses in a structural equation modeling framework. Problem-solving communication was tested as a possible moderator of the economic pressure-emotional distress pathway. Results: Results revealed that greater patient economic pressure was associated with lower patient and spouse confidence in the patient's diabetes management ability through higher levels of patient emotional distress. The deleterious association between economic pressure and emotional distress was less pronounced when spouses reported more effective problem-solving communication. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that the economic pressure couples with type 2 diabetes face may reduce the patient and spouse's confidence in the patient's diabetes management ability. Implications: This study demonstrates the importance of couple's relationship processes in buffering the impact of economic pressure on diabetes management, providing a clear target for intervention and education efforts.

14.
Appl Clin Inform ; 8(3): 710-718, 2017 Jul 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28696480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand how clinicians utilize image uploading tools in a home grown electronic health records (EHR) system. METHODS: A content analysis of patient notes containing non-radiological images from the EHR was conducted. Images from 4,000 random notes from July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010 were reviewed and manually coded. Codes were assigned to four properties of the image: (1) image type, (2) role of image uploader (e.g. MD, NP, PA, RN), (3) practice type (e.g. internal medicine, dermatology, ophthalmology), and (4) image subject. RESULTS: 3,815 images from image-containing notes stored in the EHR were reviewed and manually coded. Of those images, 32.8% were clinical and 66.2% were non-clinical. The most common types of the clinical images were photographs (38.0%), diagrams (19.1%), and scanned documents (14.4%). MDs uploaded 67.9% of clinical images, followed by RNs with 10.2%, and genetic counselors with 6.8%. Dermatology (34.9%), ophthalmology (16.1%), and general surgery (10.8%) uploaded the most clinical images. The content of clinical images referencing body parts varied, with 49.8% of those images focusing on the head and neck region, 15.3% focusing on the thorax, and 13.8% focusing on the lower extremities. CONCLUSION: The diversity of image types, content, and uploaders within a home grown EHR system reflected the versatility and importance of the image uploading tool. Understanding how users utilize image uploading tools in a clinical setting highlights important considerations for designing better EHR tools and the importance of interoperability between EHR systems and other health technology.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging , Electronic Health Records , Computer Graphics , Humans
15.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being ; 9(2): 207-227, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28401663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personality has received some attention in the Type 2 diabetes literature; however, research has not linked personality and diabetes adherence behaviors (diet and exercise), identified pathways through which they are associated, nor taken into consideration important contextual factors that influence behavior (the patient's partner). METHODS: Dyadic data from 117 married, heterosexual couples in which one member is diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes was used to explore associations between each partner's neuroticism and patient dietary and exercise adherence through the pathways of negative affect, depression symptoms, and couple-level diabetes efficacy (both patient and spouse report of confidence in the patient's ability to adhere to diabetes management regimens). RESULTS: Results revealed that higher levels of neuroticism were associated with lower patient dietary and exercise adherence through (1) higher levels of depression symptoms (for patients' neuroticism) and negative affect (for spouses' neuroticism), and (2) lower levels of couple-level diabetes efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study provide evidence that both patient and spouse personality traits are associated with patient dietary and exercise adherence through increased emotional distress-albeit different emotional pathways for patients and spouses-and lower couple confidence in the patients' ability to manage their diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Neuroticism/physiology , Patient Compliance/psychology , Personality/physiology , Self Efficacy , Adult , Aged , Depression/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diet , Exercise/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spouses/psychology
16.
J Behav Med ; 39(6): 1020-1032, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27696127

ABSTRACT

Using dyadic data from 117 married couples in which one partner was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, the purpose of this study was to determine whether a number of specific patient and spouse stressors (chronic life stress, diabetes-specific stress, and physical health stress in the form of the number of comorbidities) were associated with Type 2 diabetes patients' dietary and exercise adherence through two potentially modifiable patient and spouse factors-depression symptoms and diabetes self-efficacy. We found that patient and spouse stressors, particularly patient and spouse diabetes stress and the number of patient comorbidities, were related to patient dietary and exercise adherence through patient depression symptoms and both patient and spouse diabetes self-efficacy. These conclusions were strengthened by incorporating a number of relevant control variables in our models and by testing four alternative models which supported our proposed model. These results are important because they provide further evidence of the significant role spouses' play in managing diabetes and they provide diabetes educators and clinicians with specific targets for intervention programming.


Subject(s)
Depression/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Models, Psychological , Patient Compliance/psychology , Spouses/psychology , Adult , Depression/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diet , Exercise , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Efficacy , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/psychology
17.
Br J Health Psychol ; 20(2): 360-73, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24806751

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The current study sought to explore the indirect association of spousal overprotection on patient dietary adherence through the mechanism of diabetes distress and whether the link between overprotection and diabetes distress was moderated by spouse active engagement. METHOD: Participants were 117 married couples in which one member had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and were recruited from a patient registry at a Midwestern (USA) medical centre. Data were gathered from spouses and patients through a self-report survey instrument. The research questions were answered with structural equation modelling using the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach and dyadic data analytic procedures. RESULTS: Overprotection was associated with reduced dietary adherence indirectly via increased diabetes distress only at low levels of active engagement. The proposed model also proved superior when compared to two plausible alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of understanding the nuanced associations among the different ways spouses cope with illness to achieve better diabetes outcomes and the mechanisms responsible for linking coping and dietary adherence. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Spousal coping behaviour can influence dietary adherence among patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, positively and negatively. Spouses simultaneously engage in different ways of coping with partner illness, but little is known about the interactive nature of coping styles or possible mechanisms that might link coping with illness outcomes. What does this study add? Spousal overprotection is only associated with reduced patient dietary adherence when spouses are also engaging in low levels of active engagement. Diabetes distress is an important mechanism linking spousal coping with patient dietary adherence.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy , Diet/psychology , Patient Compliance/psychology , Spouses/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Diet/methods , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Midwestern United States , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Self Efficacy , Spouses/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Teach Learn Med ; 26(2): 168-73, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24702554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the educational value of an annual Senior Scholars Forum (SSF) of graduating Emergency Medicine resident participants and attendees. DESCRIPTION: This study was conducted at an urban academic medical center with a PGY1-4 year residency program. After completion of the 2nd annual SSF, a web-based survey instrument was sent to all resident and faculty attendees. The instrument was a 3-part tool adapted from previous studies on postgraduate scholarship. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. EVALUATION: Forty-two of the 44 (95%) attendees completed the survey, including 100% of the PGY4 resident presenters. Prior to the SSF, 52% of respondents did not have a full understanding of senior scholarly activities. After the SSF, 67% reported an improved understanding and 88% had a better understanding of the scope of potential scholarly projects. Sixty-four percent reported the SSF introduced them to departmental resources available for completion of their own scholarly projects, and 69% would have liked to have heard the lessons communicated earlier in residency. Most (79%) agreed the SSF demonstrated the value of communal scholarly activities. Most senior residents (67%) felt most of the department would not know about their scholarship if they had not participated in the SSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative SSF enhanced the scholarship process by allowing graduating senior residents an opportunity to share their scholarly productivity with a larger audience, provided attendees critical insights into the process of scholarship, and encouraged communal learning. Because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and Residency Review Committee require all residents to participate in scholarly activity, other training programs may benefit from a similar educational experience.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/education , Fellowships and Scholarships , Internship and Residency , Academic Medical Centers , Boston , Education, Medical, Graduate/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Health Psychol ; 33(8): 841-844, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24447192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Guided by the developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness (Berg & Upchurch, 2007), the purpose of this study is to explore moderated associations between spousal protective buffering and illness outcomes for partners diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (dietary adherence, frequency of exercise, and HbA1c level). Patient diabetes appraisals (distress, control, self-efficacy, and consequences) were explored as potential moderators. METHODS: Participants were 117 married couples in which one member had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Data were gathered from spouses and patients through a survey instrument and analyzed with path analysis. RESULTS: Protective buffering was associated with fewer days of exercise when patients reported low diabetes distress and diabetes consequences. Additionally, protective buffering was associated with higher HbA1c when patients reported high diabetes control. CONCLUSIONS: Protective buffering did not exhibit a uniform association with the type 2 diabetes outcomes. Rather, the association between spousal protective buffering and patient illness adjustment was dependent on patient appraisal of the illness. These findings contribute a nuanced addition to the literature documenting the role of couple coping in chronic illness management and also provide impetus for further, longitudinal investigation of the ways healthy spouses cope with partner illness.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Spouses/psychology , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diet/psychology , Exercise/psychology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Self Efficacy , Spouses/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 21(e1): e117-21, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24013137

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To understand the impact of GeneInsight Clinic (GIC), a web-based tool designed to manage genetic information and facilitate communication of test results and variant updates from the laboratory to the clinics, we measured the use of GIC and the time it took for new genetic knowledge to be available to clinicians. METHODS: Usage data were collected across four study sites for the GIC launch and post-GIC implementation time periods. The primary outcome measures were the time (average number of days) between variant change approval and notification of clinic staff, and the time between notification and viewing the patient record. RESULTS: Post-GIC, time between a variant change approval and provider notification was shorter than at launch (average days at launch 503.8, compared to 4.1 days post-GIC). After e-mail alerts were sent at launch, providers clicked into the patient record associated with 91% of these alerts. In the post period, clinic providers clicked into the patient record associated with 95% of the alerts, on average 12 days after the e-mail was sent. DISCUSSION: We found that GIC greatly increased the likelihood that a provider would receive updated variant information as well as reduced the time associated with distributing that variant information, thus providing a more efficient process for incorporating new genetic knowledge into clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrate that health information technology systems have the potential effectively to assist providers in utilizing genetic information in patient care.


Subject(s)
Communication , Genetic Testing , Internet , Electronic Mail , Humans , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...