ABSTRACT
Over a three-month period in early 2017, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner's Office investigated nine apparent opioid toxicity deaths that occurred in three separate urban, suburban, and rural counties in our jurisdiction. All decedents were known substance abusers and had reportedly recently used heroin; most were found with drug paraphernalia. Complete autopsies variably showed classic stigmata of opioid overdose with no significant injury or natural disease to explain death. Initial toxicology screens failed to identify heroin or other narcotic substances. Several cases were presumptively positive for fentanyl by immunoassay, yet failed to confirm positive for fentanyl. Following American Board of Forensic Toxicology reporting standards, these cases were reported as negative for fentanyl by the laboratory. Due to the discrepant scene and toxicology findings suggestive of an opioid toxicity death, further discussion between the medical examiners and toxicologists prompted additional testing at a referral laboratory. This resulted in quantifiable blood carfentanil in all cases (mean 0.26 ng/mL, range 0.12 - 0.64 ng/mL). Cointoxicants included ethanol (n=2), methamphetamine (n=3), benzodiazepines (n=3), and cocaine (n=1). No case had definitive evidence of acute heroin intoxication, but two cases had low concentrations of morphine present (0.03 and 0.06 ng/mL), and two others had 6-monoacetyl morphine in the urine without morphine in the blood, suggesting recent use. All deaths were certified as accidental acute or mixed carfentanil toxicity. These cases present additional information about carfentanil-related deaths and highlight the importance of collaboration between forensic pathologists and toxicologists.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients ingesting ethylene glycol, isopropanol, methanol, and propylene glycol ('toxic alcohols') often present with non-specific signs and symptoms. Definitive diagnosis of toxic alcohols has traditionally been by gas chromatography (GC), a technique not commonly performed on-site in hospital clinical laboratories. The objectives of this retrospective study were: 1) to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the osmolal gap in screening for toxic alcohol ingestion and 2) to determine the common reasons other than toxic alcohol ingestion for elevated osmolal gaps. METHODS: Electronic medical records from an academic tertiary care medical center were searched to identify all patients in the time period from January 1, 1996 to September 1, 2010 who had serum/plasma ethanol, glucose, sodium, blood urea nitrogen, and osmolality measured simultaneously, and also all patients who had GC analysis for toxic alcohols. Detailed chart review was performed on all patients with osmolal gap of 9 or greater. RESULTS: In the study period, 20,669 patients had determination of serum/plasma ethanol and osmolal gap upon presentation to the hospitals. There were 341 patients with an osmolal gap greater than 14 (including correction for estimated contribution of ethanol) on initial presentation to the medical center. Seventy-seven patients tested positive by GC for one or more toxic alcohols; all had elevated anion gap or osmolal gap or both. Other than toxic alcohols, the most common causes for an elevated osmolal gap were recent heavy ethanol consumption with suspected alcoholic ketoacidosis, renal failure, shock, and recent administration of mannitol. Only 9 patients with osmolal gap greater than 50 and no patients with osmolal gap greater than 100 were found to be negative for toxic alcohols. CONCLUSIONS: Our study concurs with other investigations that show that osmolal gap can be a useful diagnostic test in conjunction with clinical history and physical examination.
