ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the prevalence of anxiety and depression as measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in palliative care patients being treated at home with those being treated as inpatients. METHOD: The participants were palliative care patients being treated at home (n = 46) and palliative care inpatients (n = 46). Subjects were assessed for functionality on the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) and anxiety and depression were measured on the HADS. RESULTS: The results showed that ~20% of all patients were depressed and anxious as measured on the HADS, regardless of the cutoff criteria. There was no significant difference in depression and anxiety between the two groups when socioeconomic status and functionality were controlled for. Functionality, as measured on the KPS, was uniquely a predictor of depression, and younger patients were shown to have greater anxiety. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The results suggest that home-based palliative care patients and palliative care inpatients should receive equal psychological support, and that clinicians need to be aware of the psychological vulnerability of younger and less-functional patients. The prevalence of depression and anxiety indicates that all palliative care patients should be screened for psychological distress, to identify those who need further assessment and treatment.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/psychology , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Male , Palliative Care/methods , Prevalence , Sickness Impact ProfileABSTRACT
The provision of home-based palliative care requires a substantial unpaid contribution from family and friends (i.e. informal care). The present cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted between September 2003 and April 2004, describes this contribution and the impact it has on those providing informal care. The participants were 82 informal carers of patients registered with two community palliative care services in Sydney, Australia (40% of eligible carers). Carers were interviewed to assess the care recipient's care needs, the care provided by the informal carer and the health status of the carer (using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey). A number of open-ended questions asked about the impact of providing care and the type of support that carers would find helpful. Most carers reported that care recipients required help with household tasks and many needed assistance with personal activities of daily living, taking medications and organisational tasks. In the majority of cases, the principal carer provided all or most of this help. Although, on average, the physical health of carers was similar to that of the Australian population, their mental health scores were lower. Many carers reported effects on social and family relationships, restrictions on their participation in work and leisure activities, and a range of emotional reactions to their caring situation. The support carers said they would like included information and advice, in-home respite, help with household tasks, and financial support. The present study supports the view that effective support for carers must recognise the pre-existing relationship between carer and recipient, and the differing needs of individual carers.
